BlockchainGUY

There has never been a secret sauce for extracting only profits from the market. If anything, losing your entire capital is far more likely than becoming profitable, especially in the world of cryptocurrencies and digital assets. Market data consistently shows that 7 out of 10 traders lose.

So, profitability is not about money. It is about behavior.
The more chaotic the mind, the higher the likelihood of poor decision making, and in trading, poor decisions compound quickly.
One losing trade often sets off a sequence of additional losses. Ego gets involved. Dopamine takes over. The focus shifts from execution to recovery.
To reclaim what has already been lost, impatient traders frequently open new positions using excessive leverage and distorted risk-to-reward ratios, and the market is highly efficient at punishing this behavior.
It is brutal and indifferent, with the capacity to absorb every bit of margin you feed it. It does not matter how that margin was acquired. Through savings, salary, or borrowed funds. Provoking the market has only one outcome.
Liquidation.
Market Psychology: Have you ever felt as though every trade you entered moved against you?
Most traders have even I do. Consider the following scenarios.

Scenario One: You notice a token rallying and enter a 20x leveraged long. Almost immediately, the price reverses. Red candles follow one after another. The position drops 15%. Brutal.
Scenario Two: You see the same rally but conclude the market cap is already too high to justify further upside. You enter a 20x short. As soon as the position opens, the price surges 10%. Brutal.

Scenario Three: A token appears oversold. Its market cap is approximately $4M. You believe this presents an opportunity to be early. You enter a long position. Price drops further. Brutal.

Scenario Four: You have learned from previous mistakes. You are more cautious now. Better informed. You notice a meme token trading near $3M market cap and gaining traction. You dismiss it, assuming it will fade like most others.
The next day, it trades near $10M. You remain on the sidelines. By evening, it reaches $19M. Regret begins to surface, but you convince yourself the move is already extended and walk away. The following day, it surpasses $37M.
At this point, doubt sets in. You begin to reconsider. Perhaps this is actually a good project.
You finally BUY.
By the end of the day, your position is up 12%. Confidence builds. You trust the trade. You do not set a stop-loss. The next morning, your holdings are down 70%. Brutal.
The Illusion of Control :
There is a common belief that the more attention and thought you give something, the more likely it is to succeed. In financial markets, this belief rarely holds.
Markets do not respond to intent. They move independently of expectation. While outcomes remain uncertain, what is controllable is risk exposure, position sizing, and execution discipline.
Everything else is secondary.

The Difference Between Winners and Losers:
Winners are not distinguished by superior predictions. They are distinguished by process.
They position themselves early, before trends become obvious.

They prioritize capital preservation over aggressive returns.

They understand the difference between a calculated loss and a failure.

They do not follow the crowd; they anticipate it.

They operate within clearly defined rules and respect invalidation.
What is lost is accepted. What lies ahead is approached without emotional residue.
They understand risk-to-reward dynamics.

They invest time in research before entering positions.

They study tokenomics, project goals, team credibility, partnerships, and incentives.

They do not trade emotionally or impulsively.
On the other hand Losers do the opposite.

What is being profitable?
If you ask me, I'd say. " If you add $100 to your wallet in the morning, and after trading all day, even if you managed to gain $0.1, you are a profitable trader on day one.
Nothing more. Nothing less.

This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Readers are encouraged to evaluate trading instruments independently, conduct thorough research, and assess personal risk tolerance before participating in trading or investing activities. The author is not responsible for any financial losses resulting from individual decisions.Title/Thumbnail inspiration: Dan Koe’s “How to Fix Your Entire Life in One Day.”

If you enjoyed my Article, do support me by following me on @Binance Square Official .

#trading #TradingCommunity #Profitability #Articles #Square

Artificial intelligence is now part of everyday life. It helps write emails, answer questions, summarize research, and even guide financial decisions. But there’s a major problem.
AI can make mistakes, and it often sounds very sure of itself even when it’s wrong.
Sometimes, an AI provides an answer that appears accurate but isn’t entirely correct. In fact, studies have shown that large language models can generate incorrect or misleading information in up to 15% of cases, depending on the complexity of the task.
This happens because AI models predict responses based on patterns, rather than a true understanding. In simple use cases, that might not matter much. But in more serious environments, reliability becomes important.
That’s where @Mira - Trust Layer of AI comes in.
Mira Network is building a system that checks AI outputs before they’re trusted. Instead of depending on one model to give the final answer, Mira uses multiple independent validators to review the response.
Here’s how it works in simple terms.
First, an AI generates an answer. Mira then breaks that answer into smaller statements. These statements are sent to different validators in the network. Each validator checks whether the statements appear accurate or not. After that, the system looks at the overall agreement between them.
If most validators agree the answer is correct, it passes verification. If there is disagreement, the output can be flagged or rejected.

The idea is straightforward, instead of trusting one source, trust the agreement between many.
This approach is inspired by how decentralised systems work. In blockchain networks, transactions aren’t confirmed by one authority. They’re validated by many participants. Mira applies a similar idea to AI responses.
The network also uses incentives to encourage honest participation. Validators must stake $MIRA tokens to be part of the system.
If they act honestly and provide accurate checks, they earn rewards. If they act carelessly or try to manipulate results, they risk losing part of their stake.
This creates accountability. Validators have something at risk, so they’re motivated to be accurate.
It’s important to understand that Mira is not trying to build a better AI model. It’s not competing with large AI companies. Instead, it focuses on adding a verification layer on top of existing AI systems.
Think of it as a review system for AI outputs. The goal isn’t perfection. The goal is to reduce errors and add an extra layer of trust before decisions are made based on AI responses.
As AI becomes more common in different industries, the need for reliability increases. Mira Network is focused on solving that specific problem, how to make AI outputs more dependable without relying on a single centralised source.
In simple terms, Mira is building a system that checks AI before you rely on it.
#Mira #AI #MiraNetwork #ArtificialInteligence #DecentralisedAI