Jarbij

Andy666

正确的交易从来都不是天天赚麻

In this campaign,I am getting reward or noT,,plz coment..❤️❤️

Happy NeW year 2026____Start with a big blow🕯️🕯️

#binancetradingchlange

great

yes sir❤️❤️

super❤️❤️

#2025withBinance
În 2025, Binance continuă să-și consolideze poziția de lider mondial în domeniul schimbului de criptomonede, oferind soluții inovatoare pentru tranzacționari și investitori. Cu adoptarea rapidă a tehnologiei blockchain, Binance și-a extins serviciile dincolo de tranzacționarea simplă, integrând produse de finanțe descentralizate (DeFi), NFT-uri și oportunități de staking. Platforma pune accent pe securitate, transparență și interfețe prietenoase pentru utilizatori, facilitând accesul la criptomonede atât pentru începători, cât și pentru profesioniști. Prezența globală a Binance permite tranzacții fără probleme la nivel internațional, în timp ce inițiativele educaționale ajută utilizatorii să înțeleagă evoluția landscape-ului cripto. Pe măsură ce activele digitale dobândesc acceptare generală, Binance rămâne în frunte, stimulând adoptarea, inovația și emanciparea financiară, transformând astfel anul 2025 într-un an marcant în creșterea ecosistemului criptomonedei.$BNB

加油

4

ANOTHER LOOS😢

BIG LOSS TODY😓

#BNBATH and $BNB Până acum, fiecare Propunere de Îmbunătățire Bitcoin (BIP) care necesita primitive criptografice a trebuit să reinventeze roata. Fiecare a venit împachetat cu propria sa implementare personalizată în Python a curbei eliptice secp256k1 și algoritmilor aferenți, fiecare fiind subtil diferit de celelalte. Aceste inconsistențe au introdus pasive tăcute și au făcut revizuirea BIP-urilor inutil de complicată. Această problemă a fost recent evidențiată în Newsletter-ul Bitcoin Optech #348, și este ceva ce cel puțin un număr mic de dezvoltatori din comunitatea de dezvoltare Bitcoin au simțit de mult: ar trebui să existe un standard unificat, reutilizabil pentru codul de referință criptografic BIP secp256k1.
Săptămâna trecută, Jonas Nick și Tim Ruffing de la Blockstream research și Sebastian Falbesoner au făcut progrese mari în această direcție. Ca parte a propunerii lor existente ChillDKG, echipa a lansat secp256k1lab. O nouă bibliotecă Python, intenționat INSECURĂ pentru prototipare, experimentare și specificații BIP. Nu este pentru utilizare în producție (deoarece nu este constant-timp și, prin urmare, vulnerabil la atacuri prin canal lateral), dar umple o lacună critică: oferă o referință curată și consistentă pentru funcționalitatea secp256k1, inclusiv semnături de tip Schnorr în stil BIP-340, ECDH și aritmetica de nivel scăzut a câmpului/grupului. Scopul este simplu: să facă mai ușor și mai sigur să scrii viitoare BIP-uri evitând implementările redundante, unice. Pentru autorii BIP-urilor, acest lucru înseamnă: mai puțin cod personalizat, mai puține probleme de specificație și un parcurs mai clar de la prototip la propunere.

#Plume $PLUME Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.

#Dolomite $DOLO
Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.

 #BounceBitPrime $BB Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.

#walletconnect $WCT Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.

  #Mitosis $MITO Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.

 #Somnia and $SOMI Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.