OFFICIAL TAMIM

Measured Notes: Is Vanar's Zero Gas Fee a Gimmick? The Test Network Reveals Hidden Development Costs
I do not hold $VANRY tokens and have no collaboration / interest relationship with the Vanar team. The content of this article is an independent research analysis and does not constitute any investment advice. Market risks are to be borne by yourself.
Vanar's main feature of 'Zero Gas Fee + Carbon Neutrality' is not just a marketing gimmick; the practical test confirms that the transaction cost is indeed 0, but during the testing network operations, hidden development experience costs were discovered, which is the core strategy of its ecological precise screening.
The core judgment is that Vanar's zero gas fee is not a universal technological benefit, but a selection hook for the on-chain entry of traditional enterprises. By lowering the entry threshold for brand/IP parties with zero transaction costs, it raises the adaptation costs for geek-type DeFi developers, essentially precisely locking in the ecological positioning of Web2 enterprises rather than creating an all-category public chain.
Hardcore testing + comparative quantitative analysis of competing products (Vanar test network practical operation): deploying ERC-20 contracts + 10 transfers, confirmation speed of 2-3 seconds, cost 0GAS, development toolchain leans towards Web2 development logic;
Risk Priority Quantitative Analysis
High Risk: Insufficient ecological diversity, excessive focus on games/digital collectibles and other categories, weak resistance to track cycle risks, a cooling market will directly lead to a sharp decline in on-chain activity;
Medium Risk: Single developer structure, excessive proportion of Web2 developers, lack of native DeFi developers, limited ecological innovation capabilities;
Low Risk: Low adaptability of the toolchain, lack of development tools for DeFi, short-term does not affect core positioning, long-term may restrict ecological expansion.
Core Observation Indicators
Ecological project category dispersion index (proportion of games/finance/social, etc.)
The quantity ratio of Web2 integration discussions to DeFi development discussions in Discord
Growth rate of on-chain transactions for non-game/IP type DApps Vanar's zero gas fee is an on-chain invitation for traditional enterprises. Its success does not depend on the crypto circle users but on the actual number of traditional brands/IP implementations. The core value is a compliant and low-threshold Web2 on-chain solution.
Do you prefer to join ❶ the Vanar ecosystem with zero cost but clear direction or ❷ the general public chain with low cost but infinite possibilities?
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar

#Plasma $XPL Plasma Network Expands Ecosystem as Demand Grows for Scalable Blockchain Frameworks
Plasma Network is steadily expanding its ecosystem as interest rises in blockchain frameworks that can handle real-world scale. As decentralized applications move beyond experimentation into everyday use, developers and enterprises are seeking solutions that balance speed, security, and cost efficiency. Plasma Network positions itself at this intersection, focusing on modular design and scalable infrastructure.
The network’s growth is driven by an increase in developer activity and partnerships across decentralized finance, gaming, and data-driven applications. By emphasizing flexible architecture, Plasma Network allows builders to customize components without sacrificing interoperability with broader blockchain ecosystems. This approach lowers barriers to entry while supporting complex, high-volume use cases.
Another factor behind the expansion is the growing demand for predictable performance. Users increasingly expect fast transaction finality and minimal fees, especially in consumer-facing applications. Plasma Network’s framework addresses these expectations by optimizing throughput and reducing network congestion, helping projects scale without compromising user experience.
As blockchain adoption continues to accelerate, ecosystems that prioritize scalability and developer-friendly tools are likely to gain traction. Plasma Network’s ongoing expansion reflects a broader shift in the industry: from experimental platforms toward robust frameworks designed for long-term growth. With continued innovation and ecosystem support, Plasma Network aims to play a meaningful role in the next phase of blockchain development.@Plasma

Plasma is a Layer-1 blockchain specifically designed for stablecoin payments and global transfers. Its native token is XPL (often referred to as Plasma Token or $XPL ). The project positions itself as infrastructure for the growing stablecoin economy, emphasizing fast, low-cost (or zero-fee for certain stablecoin transfers like USDT), and EVM-compatible transactions to enable seamless everyday payments.Key Features and Purpose
Core Focus: Built for stablecoins rather than general-purpose DeFi or apps. It offers zero-fee USDT transfers (gasless for simple sends), custom gas tokens (pay fees in stablecoins or other assets), sub-second block times, high throughput (1000+ TPS claimed), and predictable/low fees.
Technical Highlights: Uses PlasmaBFT consensus (derived from Fast HotStuff), full EVM compatibility for easy deployment of Ethereum tools/contracts, native Bitcoin bridge for security/settlement, and merchant-friendly features like APIs for invoices/refunds.
Products: Includes Plasma One (a dashboard/app for sending stablecoins, earning yield, and potentially virtual/physical cards), making it feel like a "digital banking" layer on stablecoins.
Ecosystem Growth: Significant stablecoin TVL (billions reported in peaks, e.g., overtaking Ethereum in some metrics like sUSDe hubs), integrations with projects like Aave, Ethena, Pendle, Chainlink, and NEAR intents. It's ranked among top chains by stablecoin volume/TVL in some reports.
Tokenomics and Market Data (as of early February 2026)
Current Price: Approximately $0.10–$0.105 USD.
Market Cap: Around $220–$225 million (circulating supply ~2.2 billion XPL out of total ~10 billion genesis supply).
24h Trading Volume: $60–$90 million (high relative to market cap, indicating liquidity).
Ranking: Typically #140–#240 on trackers like CoinMarketCap/CoinGecko.
Use Cases for XPL: Staking for network security (validators/delegators), paying non-stablecoin fees, governance potential, and validator rewards. The model includes fee burns over time to tie value to usage.
Performance: Launched in late September 2025 with massive hype (peaked near $1.67, FDV in billions, strong listings on Binance/OKX/etc.). It has since declined significantly (~80–90% from ATH), trading down amid broader market conditions and fading initial excitement.
Pros
Strong niche in stablecoin infrastructure — a massive and growing market (hundreds of billions in stablecoins).
Backed by reputable investors (Bitfinex, Framework Ventures, Cobie/Jordan Fish) and raised ~$24M.
Real utility focus: Gasless stablecoin sends remove friction for payments/remittances.
Developer-friendly (EVM) with early adoption and TVL traction.
Potential for long-term value if it captures payment/settlement flows (e.g., as a "stablecoin rail").
Cons and Risks
Post-launch price crash: Heavy sell-off after hype (from $1.67 peak to sub-$0.11), with complaints of "rug" or disappointment on forums like Reddit.
Low network activity cited in some reports as a reason for decline.
Competition: Tron, Solana, Ethereum L2s, and others already handle stablecoin volume efficiently.
Vesting/unlocks (e.g., future events like July 2026 mentioned in discussions) could add selling pressure.
Scams: Fake sites (e.g., "Plasma Rewards") impersonating the project to phish wallets — always use official plasma.to.
High-risk/high-reward profile: Early hype delivered big gains for some (e.g., community/early allocs), but many late entrants faced losses.
Community and Sentiment
Mixed — early adopters and some analysts see it as undervalued infrastructure play with strong fundamentals (e.g., usage over hype). Others view it as overhyped with poor post-launch performance. Recent X discussions highlight ongoing integrations and staking activity, but price remains under pressure.
Overall Verdict
Plasma (XPL) has a compelling thesis in the stablecoin-dominated future of payments, with solid tech and partnerships. However, it launched into a hype cycle, leading to a sharp correction that's left it far below early valuations. If stablecoin adoption accelerates globally and Plasma captures meaningful share (e.g., as a low-friction settlement layer), it could rebound strongly. Right now, it's a speculative bet — high potential but with execution and market risks. Not financial advice; always DYOR, check official sources, and consider volatility in crypto.
#Plasma @Plasma $XPL

★★★Yo fam, imagine your bank actually talking to blockchain
That’s what I’ve been exploring with @Plasma
Integrating with legacy systems is messy as hell because banks weren’t built for instant settlement or decentralized ledgers
But the upside is insane:
1. Cross border payments that clear in seconds
2.Programmable money that actually moves your accounts
3.Transparency that old finance can’t touch
Sure, regs and outdated tech make it tricky, but seeing banks experiment with blockchain firsthand is wild
Every test shows just how much old finance can level up if done right
Btw, do you think $XPL will actually take over traditional banks in the next few years?
#Plasma