why does maker still use relatively high liquidation ratios in comparison to lending platforms? seems like with where liquidation infra is at this point they could easily move to 110% ratios?
high chance that over the next 12-24 months you can go short on every token that is launched from projects that have raised in 2022-24 and outperform versus if you'd go long
if there was a proper activist investor in this space, companies like @golemproject wouldn't be sitting on 100K ETH while having a ~270 mil FDV, would've been a no brainer target before the pump
if there is an alt-season it will be far more contained than before; flows have changed, institutions are now holding blue chips and those assets will not flow out of them into your alts
ja esi dibinātājs kriptovalūtu jomā, kurš vēlas izveidot vislielāko ietekmi atbilstoši gan izplatīšanas aspektam, gan savam peļņas līmenim; tas agrāk bija L1, tagad tas ir stabilo monētu infrastruktūra
ETH, iespējams, būtu bijis labāk, ja nebūtu pievienojis blobus (nebūtu ticams, ka rollupi, kas izmanto ETH, pārvietotos citur, tomēr vismaz viņi maksātu nodevas. Īpaši ņemot vērā, ka lietotāju aktivitāte vienkārši būtu migrējusi.