Kashif Imran pk
取引を発注
高頻度トレーダー
4.9年
📊 Crypto Educator | Market Analyst | Trader | Sharing insights, setups & crypto knowledge daily 💡
70 フォロー
3.0K+ フォロワー
302 いいね
35 共有
すべて
引用
ライブ
翻訳
$POL /USDT continues to lean bearish after losing its key EMA support 📉 1H
Short zone: 0.1580 – 0.1620
Targets:
TP1: 0.1530
TP2: 0.1470
TP3: 0.1415
Stop loss: 0.1665
Price structure is clean and clear: lower highs, lower lows. The rejection around 0.1866 wasn’t random — it marked a strong supply zone, and since then price has stayed firmly below the 25 EMA. The 99 EMA is no longer offering support either; it’s acting as resistance, which usually means momentum is still to the downside.
As long as price holds below the 25 EMA, the bearish bias stays intact. Any bounce into resistance looks more like a selling opportunity than a reversal — at least until the structure clearly changes.
Trade $POL 👇
#POL #Bearish #Downtrend #USNonFarmPayrollReport #WriteToEarnUpgrade
Short zone: 0.1580 – 0.1620
Targets:
TP1: 0.1530
TP2: 0.1470
TP3: 0.1415
Stop loss: 0.1665
Price structure is clean and clear: lower highs, lower lows. The rejection around 0.1866 wasn’t random — it marked a strong supply zone, and since then price has stayed firmly below the 25 EMA. The 99 EMA is no longer offering support either; it’s acting as resistance, which usually means momentum is still to the downside.
As long as price holds below the 25 EMA, the bearish bias stays intact. Any bounce into resistance looks more like a selling opportunity than a reversal — at least until the structure clearly changes.
Trade $POL 👇
#POL #Bearish #Downtrend #USNonFarmPayrollReport #WriteToEarnUpgrade
翻訳
Dusk Modularity Meets Regulated Finance
What really separates Dusk from most L1 narratives is who it’s built for. This isn’t “build anything.” It’s tokenized securities, compliant DeFi, and real-world assets—with privacy that protects market integrity. In institutions, privacy isn’t optional. It’s a requirement. Public trade leakage might be normal in DeFi, but it’s unacceptable in real finance.
Dusk’s modular roadmap makes this workable. Privacy can exist alongside familiar execution tooling. Compliance rules can be enforced without forcing developers into awkward frameworks. Partnerships like NPEX and Chainlink integrations signal the same thing: Dusk wants to plug into existing institutional standards, not reinvent them. From an investor perspective, modularity isn’t about price action. It’s about reducing adoption friction. If Dusk succeeds, it won’t be loud. It’ll just work—and that’s usually how real infrastructure wins.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #WriteToEarnUpgrade
Dusk’s modular roadmap makes this workable. Privacy can exist alongside familiar execution tooling. Compliance rules can be enforced without forcing developers into awkward frameworks. Partnerships like NPEX and Chainlink integrations signal the same thing: Dusk wants to plug into existing institutional standards, not reinvent them. From an investor perspective, modularity isn’t about price action. It’s about reducing adoption friction. If Dusk succeeds, it won’t be loud. It’ll just work—and that’s usually how real infrastructure wins.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #WriteToEarnUpgrade
翻訳
Walrus Isn’t About Storage It’s About Independence
Decentralized storage isn’t exciting. That’s actually the bullish part. If Walrus succeeds, it won’t be because of hype cycles or social media momentum. It’ll be because developers quietly choose it, repeatedly, because it works and doesn’t surprise them.
The larger trend is impossible to ignore. Data is becoming the most contested asset class in the world, especially with AI turning everything into training material. Users generate data, platforms extract value, and control remains centralized. That tension is only increasing.
Walrus positions itself as neutral infrastructure—portable, programmable, and resistant to arbitrary lockouts. But ideology alone won’t carry it. Most users default to convenience. Walrus must match centralized systems on reliability and developer experience to win.
The cleanest way to frame it is simple: Walrus isn’t selling storage space. It’s selling independence. And independence only becomes valuable once you’ve experienced life without it.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #WriteToEarnUpgrade
The larger trend is impossible to ignore. Data is becoming the most contested asset class in the world, especially with AI turning everything into training material. Users generate data, platforms extract value, and control remains centralized. That tension is only increasing.
Walrus positions itself as neutral infrastructure—portable, programmable, and resistant to arbitrary lockouts. But ideology alone won’t carry it. Most users default to convenience. Walrus must match centralized systems on reliability and developer experience to win.
The cleanest way to frame it is simple: Walrus isn’t selling storage space. It’s selling independence. And independence only becomes valuable once you’ve experienced life without it.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #WriteToEarnUpgrade
翻訳
Dusk pairs modularity with a clear target: regulated finance, tokenized securities, and compliant DeFi—not “everything for everyone.”
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #WriteToEarnUpgrade #CPIWatch
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #WriteToEarnUpgrade #CPIWatch
翻訳
Dusk: Modularity isn’t marketing. It’s risk control. Boundaries are what compliance teams and risk managers actually understand.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #Write2Earn #USJobsData
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #Write2Earn #USJobsData
翻訳
Dusk Modularity as Risk Management
In traditional finance, systems are built with boundaries. Execution venues evolve separately from settlement rails. Compliance rules don’t get rewritten every time a UI changes. Dusk mirrors that logic on-chain. By separating roles, it reduces the chance that a small upgrade causes a large failure. For traders, that’s a reliability premium. Fewer surprises. Fewer outages. Less hidden risk.
This became practical in December 2025, when Dusk rolled out a major upgrade to its core chain (DuskDS). Finality improved, costs dropped, and new APIs were introduced ahead of the DuskEVM mainnet launch. That kind of structured upgrade path is exactly what institutions look for. Change isn’t scary when it’s modular, communicated, and contained. Over time, reliability attracts deeper liquidity, and deeper liquidity changes market behavior. That’s how infrastructure quietly compounds value.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #DUSKARMY.
This became practical in December 2025, when Dusk rolled out a major upgrade to its core chain (DuskDS). Finality improved, costs dropped, and new APIs were introduced ahead of the DuskEVM mainnet launch. That kind of structured upgrade path is exactly what institutions look for. Change isn’t scary when it’s modular, communicated, and contained. Over time, reliability attracts deeper liquidity, and deeper liquidity changes market behavior. That’s how infrastructure quietly compounds value.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #DUSKARMY.
翻訳
WAL isn’t just a narrative token. It’s the payment layer for storage, designed to keep costs stable in fiat terms. That’s how infrastructure survives beyond speculation.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #WalrusProtocol #WriteToEarnUpgrade
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #WalrusProtocol #WriteToEarnUpgrade
翻訳
As of Jan 12, 2026, WAL trades around $0.1470 with a ~$231M market cap. Enough liquidity to trade, enough volatility for narratives to distort value short term.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #WriteToEarnUpgrade
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #WriteToEarnUpgrade
翻訳
Why WAL’s Economics Matter More Than the Narrative
Infrastructure tokens usually fail for one simple reason: unpredictable costs. If using the network means taking full exposure to token volatility, serious users won’t commit. Walrus addresses this directly by designing storage pricing to remain stable in fiat terms over time.
That detail matters more than most headlines. It’s the difference between “interesting tech” and something builders can rely on long term. WAL functions as the payment layer for storage, but users aren’t forced to gamble on price swings just to keep their data online.
As of Jan 12, 2026, WAL trades around $0.14 with a market cap near $225M. That puts it in an awkward but interesting zone—liquid enough to trade, volatile enough for narratives to temporarily dominate fundamentals.
For traders, that creates opportunity. For investors, the real signal won’t be price spikes. It’ll be steady growth in stored data and consistent demand for storage services. That’s when a token stops being theoretical and starts being real.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #WalrusProtocol
That detail matters more than most headlines. It’s the difference between “interesting tech” and something builders can rely on long term. WAL functions as the payment layer for storage, but users aren’t forced to gamble on price swings just to keep their data online.
As of Jan 12, 2026, WAL trades around $0.14 with a market cap near $225M. That puts it in an awkward but interesting zone—liquid enough to trade, volatile enough for narratives to temporarily dominate fundamentals.
For traders, that creates opportunity. For investors, the real signal won’t be price spikes. It’ll be steady growth in stored data and consistent demand for storage services. That’s when a token stops being theoretical and starts being real.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #WalrusProtocol
翻訳
Dusk avoids a monolithic chain. Settlement, execution, and privacy are separated so one upgrade doesn’t break everything else.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #Write2Earn
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #Write2Earn
翻訳
Retail can live with clunky upgrades and public strategies. Institutions can’t. They need systems that feel like infrastructure, not experiments.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #USNonFarmPayrollReport
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #USNonFarmPayrollReport
翻訳
Institutions don’t ask Where’s the yield? They ask, How do you trade size without leaking your position? That question explains why Dusk cares so much about modular design.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #WriteToEarnUpgrade
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #WriteToEarnUpgrade
翻訳
Why Institutions Care About Modularity
The first time you hear a serious trader talk about on-chain markets, it’s rarely about yield. It’s about exposure. “How do you run size when everyone can see you building a position?” That question alone explains why Dusk’s modular design matters. Institutions don’t want experiments. They want infrastructure—systems that behave predictably, manage risk cleanly, and don’t fall apart every time there’s an upgrade.
Dusk approaches this by avoiding a one-size-fits-all blockchain. Instead of forcing execution, settlement, privacy, and data availability into a single layer, it separates them. The base layer focuses on consensus and settlement (DuskDS), execution lives in DuskEVM, and privacy is handled in its own environment. This isn’t about buzzwords. It’s about isolating risk. When one layer changes, the whole system doesn’t have to. That’s the difference between something institutions can plan around and something they can’t touch.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #DUSKARMY.
Dusk approaches this by avoiding a one-size-fits-all blockchain. Instead of forcing execution, settlement, privacy, and data availability into a single layer, it separates them. The base layer focuses on consensus and settlement (DuskDS), execution lives in DuskEVM, and privacy is handled in its own environment. This isn’t about buzzwords. It’s about isolating risk. When one layer changes, the whole system doesn’t have to. That’s the difference between something institutions can plan around and something they can’t touch.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #DUSKARMY.
翻訳
Your edge isn’t just your strategy. It’s your stored history logs, datasets, configs. Lose access to that, and you’re starting from zero. Walrus makes that kind of failure harder.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #USNonFarmPayrollReport
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #USNonFarmPayrollReport
翻訳
Blockchains prove events well. They’re terrible at storing large data. Walrus fills that gap handling videos PDFs datasets and AI files while keeping verification decentralized.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #WalrusProtocol
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #WalrusProtocol
翻訳
Cloud storage is convenient, not sovereign. One policy change, one lockout, and years of work can vanish. Walrus flips this model by removing the single gatekeeper from storage.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #TrumpNewTariffs
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus #TrumpNewTariffs
原文参照
暗号資産における真の欠落している要素はデータ所有権である
暗号資産は長年にわたり、資金の所有権について語ってきた。しかし、データの所有権についてははるかに少ない注目が向けられている。データの喪失は、資金の喪失と同様に、場合によってはそれ以上に深刻な影響を与える。クラウドアカウントがロックされたり、サービスのポリシーが変更されたり、プラットフォームが消えたりすると、何年もかけて蓄積したデータがアクセスできなくなってしまう。ハッキングでも盗難でもない。ただ、消えただけだ。
ウォルラスはまさにこの欠点を補うために存在する。Suiに構築された分散型ストレージネットワークであり、ブロックチェーンが効率的に保管できない大容量のファイルを扱うことを目的としている。データセット、動画、研究ファイル、AIトレーニングデータ、アプリの履歴などである。単一の企業に信頼を寄せることなく、データは複数の独立したプロバイダーに分割・分散して保管される。
ウォルラスはまさにこの欠点を補うために存在する。Suiに構築された分散型ストレージネットワークであり、ブロックチェーンが効率的に保管できない大容量のファイルを扱うことを目的としている。データセット、動画、研究ファイル、AIトレーニングデータ、アプリの履歴などである。単一の企業に信頼を寄せることなく、データは複数の独立したプロバイダーに分割・分散して保管される。
翻訳
BTC/USDT Trade Setup
Entry: $91,000 – $91,100
Stop Loss: $90,400 (below the 24h low)
TP1: $91,500
TP2: $91,800
BTC continues to respect EMA 7 and EMA 25, with solid support sitting around the $90.5K area. As long as this zone holds, buyers remain in control. A clean break above $91,283 would likely clear the way toward the $91.8K region.
Keep position size small and stay alert. If price starts getting rejected near the highs, don’t hesitate to step aside.
$BTC Buy Long Entry:👇
#BTC #btcuptrend #WriteToEarnUpgrade #USJobsData #CPIWatch
Entry: $91,000 – $91,100
Stop Loss: $90,400 (below the 24h low)
TP1: $91,500
TP2: $91,800
BTC continues to respect EMA 7 and EMA 25, with solid support sitting around the $90.5K area. As long as this zone holds, buyers remain in control. A clean break above $91,283 would likely clear the way toward the $91.8K region.
Keep position size small and stay alert. If price starts getting rejected near the highs, don’t hesitate to step aside.
$BTC Buy Long Entry:👇
#BTC #btcuptrend #WriteToEarnUpgrade #USJobsData #CPIWatch
翻訳
ZEC/USDT – Bullish Breakout Idea
Entry:
I’d wait for a clean 15-minute close above 393.95. If that happens, looking for entries around 395.00 makes sense. No need to force it early.
Stop Loss:
378.00 is a good line in the sand. It sits below the recent swing low and under the 99 EMA, so a move there would likely mean the bullish structure has failed.
Targets:
TP1: 410.00 – near the recent 24-hour high
TP2: 425.00 – the next resistance area
TP3: 445.00 – the measured move if momentum really expands
ZEC is acting strong here. Price is holding well above the 7, 25, and 99 EMAs, and instead of pulling back hard, it’s just drifting near the highs. That kind of slow, tight consolidation, especially with volume creeping up, usually tells you buyers are still around.
Key Level to Watch:
Keep an eye on 400.60. A strong push above it, followed by a hold, would go a long way in confirming the breakout.
Manage risk properly. Once TP1 is hit, trailing the stop can help lock in gains while still giving the trade some room to run.$ZEC 👇
#zec #SwingTrade #Breakout #ZEN/USDT #WriteToEarnUpgrade
Entry:
I’d wait for a clean 15-minute close above 393.95. If that happens, looking for entries around 395.00 makes sense. No need to force it early.
Stop Loss:
378.00 is a good line in the sand. It sits below the recent swing low and under the 99 EMA, so a move there would likely mean the bullish structure has failed.
Targets:
TP1: 410.00 – near the recent 24-hour high
TP2: 425.00 – the next resistance area
TP3: 445.00 – the measured move if momentum really expands
ZEC is acting strong here. Price is holding well above the 7, 25, and 99 EMAs, and instead of pulling back hard, it’s just drifting near the highs. That kind of slow, tight consolidation, especially with volume creeping up, usually tells you buyers are still around.
Key Level to Watch:
Keep an eye on 400.60. A strong push above it, followed by a hold, would go a long way in confirming the breakout.
Manage risk properly. Once TP1 is hit, trailing the stop can help lock in gains while still giving the trade some room to run.$ZEC 👇
#zec #SwingTrade #Breakout #ZEN/USDT #WriteToEarnUpgrade
翻訳
Why the NPEX Partnership Defines Dusk’s Real Market
The NPEX partnership reveals what Dusk is really targeting: regulated securities, not retail narratives.
Working toward a blockchain-powered securities exchange means licensing, governance, disclosures, and accountability are non-negotiable. This isn’t “we’ll figure compliance out later.” It’s compliance as the starting point.
Add Quantoz Payments and the EURQ stablecoin concept, and the pattern becomes clearer. Dusk isn’t only talking to crypto-native teams. It’s connecting with payment and exchange infrastructure that already lives under regulatory oversight.
The deeper insight is this: privacy in finance isn’t suspicious. It’s normal. Investor identities, trade sizes, and settlement details are rarely public in traditional markets. Dusk’s bet is that blockchains should reflect that reality — selective disclosure instead of full exposure or total opacity.
If Dusk succeeds, it won’t feel revolutionary. It will feel boring, structured, and safe.
That’s exactly the point.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #Dusk/usdt✅
Working toward a blockchain-powered securities exchange means licensing, governance, disclosures, and accountability are non-negotiable. This isn’t “we’ll figure compliance out later.” It’s compliance as the starting point.
Add Quantoz Payments and the EURQ stablecoin concept, and the pattern becomes clearer. Dusk isn’t only talking to crypto-native teams. It’s connecting with payment and exchange infrastructure that already lives under regulatory oversight.
The deeper insight is this: privacy in finance isn’t suspicious. It’s normal. Investor identities, trade sizes, and settlement details are rarely public in traditional markets. Dusk’s bet is that blockchains should reflect that reality — selective disclosure instead of full exposure or total opacity.
If Dusk succeeds, it won’t feel revolutionary. It will feel boring, structured, and safe.
That’s exactly the point.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk #Dusk/usdt✅
さらにコンテンツを探すには、ログインしてください