Some accounts are reporting that a “Satoshi-era” wallet has reactivated and accumulated 26,900 $BTC ($2.45B). If true, it’s a meaningful size signal — but the key is verification.
Until a wallet address + explorer links are shared and independently confirmed, this stays a watch-item, not a validated headline.
Solana is once again testing the $141–$145 zone after bouncing from sub-$135 and reclaiming $140.
Past tests near $145 have acted as a supply wall, so confirmation matters here.
Price structure is supported while SOL holds above key moving averages, but network growth is cooling—weekly new wallet creation has slipped to ~7.3M vs 30.2M at the peak (per Santiment).
That divergence means upside needs a real catalyst + volume, not just grind. Break and hold above $145 = bullish continuation toward $165–$180. Rejection = range trading likely continues under resistance.
US liquidity YoY started trending upward in mid‑November, and just days later $BTC printed a local bottom.
This reinforces a core macro principle: liquidity expansion often leads risk‑asset reversals, because new money tends to reach markets before headlines catch up.
BTC is around $90.5K right now, so it’s a good moment to watch whether liquidity tailwinds translate into sustained follow-through (not just a short squeeze).
The $BTC liquidation heatmap is showing an imbalance: there’s liquidity below (some long-liquidation risk clustered near ~88K), but a larger pool of short-liquidation levels sits above current price. Why it matters: heatmaps highlight “magnetic zones” where forced liquidations can accelerate price moves; if BTC pushes up into dense short clusters, shorts can get squeezed and buy pressure can compound.
It’s not a guarantee of direction—just a map of where volatility can spike—so the key is watching how price reacts as it approaches those bright zones.
$BTC is showing similar behavior to April 2025, when BTC broke out of its prior range and closed the month up about 12.49% near $94,011.
Now, whales appear to be cutting long exposure (a behavior some analysts say has historically shown up near local floors before sharp moves).
If history rhymes, this kind of structure can transition from compression into expansion—similar to Q2 2025, when BTC rose about 30.7% and set a new ATH near $112,000.
After a full downtrend and liquidity sweep, price has spent weeks consolidating tightly—often a sign that selling pressure is cooling and the market is absorbing supply.
Markets usually expand after compression, so the next break should be decisive. Key levels to watch: hold $2.08 and reclaim/clear $2.11 while XRP trades around $2.09.
Raoul Pal’s “liquidity” setup for Bitcoin Raoul Pal’s main point is that Bitcoin tends to follow global liquidity more than short-term headlines.
If liquidity conditions keep improving into 2026, that can create a better backdrop for risk assets without needing any hype.
Instead of calling for a “big breakout,” it’s probably cleaner to watch the usual macro tells (dollar, rates, broad liquidity) and let price confirm.
That also keeps the conversation grounded and avoids low-quality “guaranteed move” posts, which Binance Square doesn’t want. What’s your go-to liquidity signal to track—DXY, yields, or global M2?
Ethereum isn’t trying to be a flashy “app” — Vitalik keeps framing it as infrastructure, kind of like Linux for blockchains. He’s even compared scaling to BitTorrent: push work out to the edges instead of relying on one central coordinator. The goal is a neutral base layer people can use without needing to trust a single middleman. If that’s the path, adoption might look slow and boring… but it can be really hard to replace later.
Do you see ETH more as infrastructure, or as an app ecosystem?