Iftikhar Ahmed Noor のプロフィール

·

--

翻訳参照

Was Jane Street the Secret Villain Behind Terra’s $40 Billion Crypto Collapse?In a development that could completely reshape how we view one of crypto’s most infamous disasters, a federal case opened on February 23, 2026, is now accusing Jane Street of playing a far more aggressive role in the collapse of Terra than previously understood. Yes — that Terra. The implosion of TerraUSD (UST) and its sister token LUNA wiped out an estimated $40 billion in market value back in 2022. It triggered panic across the entire crypto ecosystem, accelerated regulatory crackdowns, and set off a domino effect that crushed multiple funds and lenders. But now, new allegations suggest this wasn’t just a flawed algorithm collapsing under pressure. According to the complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan (Case No. 1:26-cv-1504), Jane Street allegedly obtained confidential information about emergency stabilization efforts from Terraform Labs, the company behind Terra. The lawsuit claims the firm used internal connections — including employees Bryce Pratt and Michael Huang, along with co-founder Robert Granieri — to gain insight into Terraform’s defensive strategy as UST began losing its peg. If true, this changes everything. The Alleged Playbook The process alleges that Jane Street gained access to non-public information regarding Terraform’s emergency liquidity measures meant to defend UST’s $1 peg. With advance knowledge of these stabilization attempts, the firm is accused of strategically positioning itself in a way that accelerated the de-pegging instead of stabilizing it. In simple terms: while retail investors were trying to understand what was happening, someone may have already known how the rescue plan worked — and potentially how to trade against it. That’s a serious claim. The Terra collapse has long been blamed on structural weaknesses in its algorithmic design. UST relied on arbitrage mechanics involving LUNA to maintain its peg. When confidence cracked, the mechanism spiraled into a death loop. But this new filing suggests that market structure flaws may not have been the only factor at play. Why This Matters Now For years, the Terra meltdown has been viewed primarily as a failure of decentralized financial engineering — a cautionary tale about algorithmic stablecoins. But if a major quantitative trading firm knowingly exploited inside information during the crisis, the narrative shifts from “system failure” to “potential coordinated acceleration.” That distinction is huge. It would raise critical questions about: Market fairness in crypto during crisis events The role of institutional players in destabilizing fragile systems Whether Terra’s collapse was purely organic — or partially engineered The Bigger Picture It’s important to note that these are allegations within an active federal case. No findings of liability have been made. Jane Street has not been found guilty of any wrongdoing. But the mere existence of this lawsuit reopens wounds in the crypto industry. Terra wasn’t just another failed token — it was a systemic shock that erased life savings, destroyed funds, and reshaped regulatory momentum globally. If new evidence proves that sophisticated players exploited privileged access during that collapse, trust in crypto market structure takes another hit. This case could either reinforce the “risk and volatility” narrative — or expose something much deeper about how information asymmetry operates in digital asset markets. Either way, February 23, 2026, might become another important date in crypto history. $NVDAon $AAPLon $MSFTon

Was Jane Street the Secret Villain Behind Terra’s $40 Billion Crypto Collapse?

In a development that could completely reshape how we view one of crypto’s most infamous disasters, a federal case opened on February 23, 2026, is now accusing Jane Street of playing a far more aggressive role in the collapse of Terra than previously understood.
Yes — that Terra.
The implosion of TerraUSD (UST) and its sister token LUNA wiped out an estimated $40 billion in market value back in 2022. It triggered panic across the entire crypto ecosystem, accelerated regulatory crackdowns, and set off a domino effect that crushed multiple funds and lenders.
But now, new allegations suggest this wasn’t just a flawed algorithm collapsing under pressure.
According to the complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan (Case No. 1:26-cv-1504), Jane Street allegedly obtained confidential information about emergency stabilization efforts from Terraform Labs, the company behind Terra. The lawsuit claims the firm used internal connections — including employees Bryce Pratt and Michael Huang, along with co-founder Robert Granieri — to gain insight into Terraform’s defensive strategy as UST began losing its peg.
If true, this changes everything.
The Alleged Playbook
The process alleges that Jane Street gained access to non-public information regarding Terraform’s emergency liquidity measures meant to defend UST’s $1 peg. With advance knowledge of these stabilization attempts, the firm is accused of strategically positioning itself in a way that accelerated the de-pegging instead of stabilizing it.
In simple terms: while retail investors were trying to understand what was happening, someone may have already known how the rescue plan worked — and potentially how to trade against it.
That’s a serious claim.
The Terra collapse has long been blamed on structural weaknesses in its algorithmic design. UST relied on arbitrage mechanics involving LUNA to maintain its peg. When confidence cracked, the mechanism spiraled into a death loop. But this new filing suggests that market structure flaws may not have been the only factor at play.
Why This Matters Now
For years, the Terra meltdown has been viewed primarily as a failure of decentralized financial engineering — a cautionary tale about algorithmic stablecoins.
But if a major quantitative trading firm knowingly exploited inside information during the crisis, the narrative shifts from “system failure” to “potential coordinated acceleration.”
That distinction is huge.
It would raise critical questions about:
Market fairness in crypto during crisis events
The role of institutional players in destabilizing fragile systems
Whether Terra’s collapse was purely organic — or partially engineered
The Bigger Picture
It’s important to note that these are allegations within an active federal case. No findings of liability have been made. Jane Street has not been found guilty of any wrongdoing.
But the mere existence of this lawsuit reopens wounds in the crypto industry.
Terra wasn’t just another failed token — it was a systemic shock that erased life savings, destroyed funds, and reshaped regulatory momentum globally. If new evidence proves that sophisticated players exploited privileged access during that collapse, trust in crypto market structure takes another hit.
This case could either reinforce the “risk and volatility” narrative — or expose something much deeper about how information asymmetry operates in digital asset markets.
Either way, February 23, 2026, might become another important date in crypto history.
$NVDAon $AAPLon $MSFTon

Iftikhar Ahmed Noor

Was Jane Street the Secret Villain Behind Terra’s $40 Billion Crypto Collapse?

Nvidiaが業界を驚かせる: 30年の歴史の後、2026年にゲームGPUをリリースしない

🚀 3 Steps I’m Using to Start Crypto Safely in 2026

分岐点にあるPiコイン：1600万の移行対$0.108の崩壊リスク

🚨 プーチンがトランプに制裁解除のための$12兆の取引を申し出たと報じられています — 次に何が起こるでしょうか？

春祭りのガラの後、レン・ゼーピンはロボティクス関連株に強気

⚠️ 最も恐ろしい仮定：景気後退はない

トレンドトピック