DARK BULL

Quando ho iniziato a prestare attenzione al Fabric Protocol, non sono stato attratto da grandi promesse. Sono stato attratto dai piccoli cambiamenti che sembravano reali. Il Fabric Protocol, supportato dalla Fabric Foundation, sta costruendo una rete aperta in cui robot e umani possono lavorare insieme in sicurezza. Ma ciò che mi interessa di più non è la grande visione. È il modo in cui le persone dietro la rete—soprattutto i validatori—stanno lentamente cambiando il loro comportamento man mano che gli incentivi cambiano. Quel cambiamento mi dice di più sulla salute dell'ecosistema di qualsiasi annuncio potrebbe fare.

La prima volta che ho fiducia in Mira Network con qualcosa di reale, non è stata drammatica. Non c'erano avvisi lampeggianti o conti alla rovescia cinematografici. Era solo il crepuscolo che si posava su un affollato mercato di quartiere, robot di consegna che attendevano al margine di una strada stretta, e io che deciso di lasciare che il sistema scegliesse il loro percorso. Ricordo di aver sentito quel peso silenzioso nel mio petto, non paura esattamente, ma consapevolezza. Quando la tecnologia passa dalla teoria allo spazio vissuto, la correttezza smette di essere un numero e inizia a diventare una responsabilità. Quella sera, la rete non cercava di essere brillante. Non inseguiva il percorso più veloce possibile. Si è fermata, ha riorientato due volte e ha permesso che i vuoti nel traffico pedonale si formassero naturalmente prima di procedere. Le consegne sono arrivate qualche minuto in ritardo. Nulla è andato in crash. Nessuno ha preso paura. E mi sono reso conto che avere ragione nel mondo reale spesso assomiglia a scegliere la pazienza rispetto alle prestazioni.

Quando penso all'architettura Fogo che richiede un nuovo framework di valutazione, non immagino diagrammi o dibattiti tecnici. Immagino persone. Immagino qualcuno che apre il proprio laptop presto al mattino, il caffè è ancora caldo, aspettandosi che il sistema si comporti come ieri. Niente drammi. Niente sorprese. Solo una coerenza silenziosa. È lì che l'architettura guadagna la sua reputazione.

Nel corso degli anni, ho imparato che l'affidabilità non si annuncia da sola. Si manifesta in piccoli momenti. Un'implementazione che termina senza tensione. Un aggiornamento che non si propaga in posti inaspettati. Un nuovo membro del team che può seguire i passaggi e raggiungere lo stesso risultato degli altri. Queste cose suonano ordinarie, ma non sono accidentali. Sono segni di disciplina integrati nella fondazione.

Non sono venuto a questo progetto cercando qualcosa di impressionante. Sono arrivato dopo essermi stancato di dire: “Lascia che controlli di nuovo”, una volta di troppo.

L'IA è veloce. A volte è brillante. Ma c'è sempre quella piccola pausa dopo aver letto una risposta — quella voce interiore che chiede: È davvero giusto? Vivevo in quella pausa. Mi rendeva cauto, a volte persino esitante nel fidarmi di ciò che vedevo.

Ciò che sembrava diverso qui era il passaggio dall'accettazione cieca alla verifica costante.

A new blockchain that functions similarly to Solana is referred to as a "Solana clone."That is untrue in Fogo's case.

We refer to anything that uses the base as something else when we talk about clones. For example, when someone moves into an apartment, they make minor adjustments and use what's already there. That was not what Fogo did. It destroyed the old. created something new with previously unobtainable materials. Fogo and Solana could appear identical at first look. They are able to execute the same smart contracts, share a machine, and have similar tools. A closer examination reveals that their objectives are very different. While Fogo wants to create something, Solana wants to make it better.

An illustration of this distinction is the Firedancer scenario. Solana has been awaiting the full deployment of Firedancer, a client that will speed up operations. Fogo didn't hold out. From the beginning, it incorporated Firedancer elements into its protocol. There are some consequences to this choice. It feels weird to run Solana contracts on Fogo. The same code is used. It operates significantly more quickly. It is comparable to the distinction between a bike and a car. You can get where you want to go with either of them. It's a completely different experience.

It is evident that Fogo made certain decisions when we contrast him with Sui and Aptos. Although Move is a language, learning it might be challenging. Fogo may use the developers, tools, and contracts as Solana because it opted to adopt SVM. This facilitates Solana developers' transition to Fogo. To get this performance, Fogo also had to make some compromises. Because Fogo requires sophisticated computers, participation is limited to those who own equipment. This contradicts the concept of blockchain, which was meant to be accessible to everyone, not just wealthy individuals.

Some questions are raised by this. If only a small number of people can sign up, is Fogo still a system? Is it simply a very effective yet closed system? Depending on your definition of decentralization, the answer will vary. Is it to ensure that the system is safe and secure, or is it to ensure that everyone can join? Because Fogo does not attempt to conceal its drawbacks, it is a system worth considering. It is made to be incredibly quick. In order to achieve that speed, it is prepared to sacrifice some openness. This could be blockchain's future. It might be a first step in the right path. In any case, Fogo is forcing the industry to consider its desires.

@Fogo Official $FOGO #fogo #Fogo

For a long time, many believed that the main goal of blockchain security was to always have as many nodes online. This required every validator to be held accountable every hour and every node to be present at all times. A node was deemed problematic if it wasn't online. was disciplined. The question of whether forcing nodes to be online even when they weren't in a good position to be was a good concept was not given any attention. Fogo gave this some thought. It altered the way their blockchain was created.

Fogos's New Concept: Prioritizing Quality Over Quantity Fogo's validator architecture is based on the straightforward principle that a node participating in consensus from the incorrect location at the wrong time or with malfunctioning hardware is not beneficial. In fact, it's becoming worse. It slows everyone down, much like an automobile on the freeway. This is an issue with traditional blockchains since they attempt to have all nodes cooperate, even if some of them are sluggish. This implies that in order to make room for the nodes, the entire network must slow down. By allowing the appropriate nodes to be online at the appropriate moment, the Fogos curated validator model resolves this issue. The network becomes faster and more secure as a result.

Pay Attention to the Sun, Not the Clock The architecture of Fogos Validator Zones is predicated on this notion. Validators are only available online during specific hours and are situated close to market infrastructure. For instance, during Asian trading hours, validators in Asia are online. The validators go offline at the end of trading hours. This has nothing to do with their failure. Because that's how it was planned. This is comparable to the way that finance operates. Market makers are not always required to be present on stock exchanges. Market makers participate at certain times throughout their designated hours and sessions. Fogo uses their validators to do this.

The Advantages of Scheduled Rest The fact that Fogo's design genuinely accounts for validators occasionally going offline is one of its intriguing features. It could seem counterintuitive. In actuality, it is more secure than having every validator online at all times. The network is ready for a validator zone to go offline. The network may still operate, and strategies are in place. This contrasts with blockchains, where an unforeseen node failure may result in issues. Instead of making the network less resilient, Fogo's design increases it. What Went Wrong in the Industry

Because the original validators were all in one location, some people could assume that Fogo's design is centralized. This is untrue. Since Fogos design offers greater flexibility and resilience than blockchains, it is actually more decentralized. The Design Theory That Revolutionizes Everything Fogo's design represents a significant technical advancement. It provides a fresh perspective on blockchain security. Instead of penalizing nodes for being offline, Fogo's design allows nodes to occasionally be offline. This approach to blockchain security is practical and robust.

@Fogo Official $FOGO #fogo

This is something that no cryptocurrency enthusiast likes to acknowledge: your preferred Layer-1 is not slow because its creators did a good job. Because it makes the world seem smaller than it actually is, it is slow. The reason your beloved Layer-1 is slow isn't because of the programming; rather, it's because it makes the world appear smaller than it is.

There is no plan for the speed of light. It simply continues without stopping. Light travels at an extremely high speed. It can navigate without the aid of a road map. Since light is a component of the universe and goes swiftly, it has that speed. The speed of light is perfectly acceptable.

Before I discovered Fogo, I spent weeks working on L1 designs, and the difference was immediately apparent. The majority of other initiatives concentrate on improving the software. They attempt to redesign the mempool and improve the way the compilers operate at the moment. Fogo takes a different approach. It begins with a question that most teams don't consider: how quickly can data truly flow between the devices that maintain the security of this network? About this question, Fogo is. Fogo truly gets you to consider how quickly information can move between various devices.

Everything changes when you ask that question. The speed of light traveling via a fiber optic cable is 200,000 kilometers per second. Imagine now that a computer in Tokyo is communicating with a computer in New York. The message travels back and forth in at least 67 milliseconds. This takes place prior to the computer even executing the code that ensures consensus. This delay is not considered by the majority of other systems. They describe their systems as though the computers are weightless and simply float in space. According to Fogo, the computers are devices that are affixed to the soil in particular locations.

Why Finality Is Enemy of Averages Things start to get extremely intriguing at this point. The validator who works the fastest does not make the ultimate decision. In reality, the one controls it. Every chain in use worldwide has an issue that is not immediately apparent. The disparity between its typical performance and its poor performance during periods of high demand. This issue does not improve when the networks are really busy. Bitcoin. This problem is present in other globally dispersed chains. In fact, the issue grows far worse.

Because it significantly reduces the number of validators actually operating, Fogos Multi-Local Consensus is a big deal. This means that because Fogos Multi-Local Consensus has validators all over the world, it places them in specific locations where they can communicate with each other quickly. We are discussing the transmission of messages in a matter of milliseconds. This leads to a number that doesn't sound well in a presentation. In reality, it takes 40 ms to generate a new block. The finest feature is that even when many users are using Fogos Multi-Local Consensus simultaneously, the speed does not decrease. Fogos Multi-Local Consensus has a significant impact.

It's a difficult trade-off that no one wants to discuss. People don't want to consider it. We will all have to deal with the tradeoff at some point. We must make decisions. What we receive in exchange is the tradeoff. The trade-off that no one likes to talk about is crucial because it has an impact on our lives. When making decisions, we must take the tradeoff into account. Accepting the trade-off is not always simple. We must learn to accept the trade-off because it is a fact of life.

The fact that the validators are all in one location will be criticized by those who dislike this approach, and they have a point. The fact that the validators are centralized in one location is problematic. The naysayers are overlooking a crucial point: a global group of validators who are slow decision makers is not superior to a smaller group of validators who are fast decision makers. Simply stating that something is decentralized does not benefit its users. When a system is dependable and functions properly, it truly helps individuals. The fact that the validators are in one location is problematic. The system's dependability and speed are also crucial. The ability of the validators to produce findings rapidly and the dependability of the system are more important than the decentralization of the validators.

Fogo makes no secret of the compromises it makes. It has a system in which all network components must operate at a certain speed. A part is replaced if it is too slow. This is merely ensuring that the key components of the network function properly; it is not opposed to the concept of decentralization. Like a team, Fogo ensures that everything goes without a hitch. You don't want the speed of other people's internet connections to be determined by yours. Therefore, why would you agree to such for something as significant as business dealings with Fogo? The goal of Fogo is to ensure that financial settlement proceeds swiftly and consistently. Compatibility of SVMs Without Congestion Inheritance

Fogo has access to the Solana development ecosystem when it runs on the Solana Virtual Machine.
Contracts, tooling, and liquidity channels are all included in this. Fogo is a network that operates independently. Therefore, Fogo does not experience these issues during Solana's congestion incidents. For instance, the Solana network may get extremely busy when several users are attempting to mint something on it. Every forty milliseconds, Fogo continues to create new blocks. This is due to the fact that the Fogo network is distinct from Solana. There is a state space for Fogo. This indicates that Solana's issues do not influence Fogo. Although they have their own infrastructure, they speak the same language. This is a crucial differentiation. It is more valuable than most people realize. Solana and Fogo are similar to two systems. Even if Solana is struggling, Fogo can continue to run. What Modified My Framework

I had believed that my framework was the best approach. After that, something occurred that fundamentally altered my framework. I used to base my structure on doing as I was told and abiding by the rules. My framework has changed since then. My foundation focuses on trying new things and keeping an open mind. My learning and development are greatly aided by this new framework. That my framework changed makes me very happy. My framework is still in place. I can't wait to see where it leads. Several factors contributed to the modification of my framework: * Getting to know people with diverse outlooks on life* Reading works that made me reevaluate my perspective * Going through situations that made me change and develop

I am rather pleased that my framework has changed from what it was. I've made my structure more adaptable and changeable. My framework seems to be assisting me in developing as a person. It will be interesting to observe how my framework develops and changes over time. After doing this research, I have a different perspective on L1s. I don't inquire about the L1s' execution engine speed. Rather, I would like to know how disjointed the L1 validators are and what happens to the L1's finality when the network is really busy. The problem is that the majority of L1 projects are unable to respond to the second query.

Fogo is truly amazing. No one truly understands physics, so it's not because Fogo did. Fogo stopped acting as though there was nothing wrong with physics. Many businesses claim things that are simply unattainable. Therefore, it's fantastic that Fogo is being straightforward about physics. It's encouraging that Fogo is being honest. It appears to be the sign I haven't seen in a while. Fogo is telling the truth. That's what counts. Things last longer when they are constructed with rules in mind. Infrastructure that respects limitations always experiences this. Infrastructure that recognizes limitations is superior to that which disregards them. Infrastructure that adheres to limitations consistently outlasts that which disregards them.

@Fogo Official $FOGO #fogo