cryptocruisader
5 Following
37 Followers
40 Liked
0 Shared
$NTRN is on discount, buy.
Target 0.7 - 0.78
Target 0.7 - 0.78
Buying NTRN long now. 3x
NTRN on discount boys ;)$ $NTRN
Goal for now is 0.83
Goal for now is 0.83
#Memecoins If you want to try memecoins go for SMOG or MUMU, dont risk all your money but if this rockets, when it rains it pours, holy moly easyy. 20x
Most people are dumb as shit here, dont trust these hallucination predictions. Solana 9999$ forget that.
Trade with your guts and do your research!
Trade with your guts and do your research!
$NTRN
Goal 1.3 - 1.4
Goal 1.3 - 1.4
f-orget-ck the nonsense
f-orget-ck the patterns
Trade my boys! We will win
f-orget-ck the patterns
Trade my boys! We will win
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
StrategyBTCPurchase
77.1M views
285,585 Discussing
Bitcoin
Nothing has really change since my latest update about BTC as the price remains in sideway chop for now.
However there is a news and reaction that is caught me off guard for today. It's not Iran things or anything. It's about Powell.
Basically Powell came out after the criminal probe and accused the executive is pushing him to the ground because he doesn't want to lower the rate.
However during this crazy news, we are seeing BTC is having a bounce and S&P is also in the same level as previous week's close.
What does it mean?
I think that market is so bullish that even the news like this can't drive the price lower.
BTC is having a bounce and I think this is short covering in the lower time frame. However if the spot bidder step in this $92k resistance, we should see $98k to be tested sooner than everyone expects.
#StrategyBTCPurchase
#USNonFarmPayrollReport
#USTradeDeficitShrink
#ZTCBinanceTGE
#USJobsData
noMAeffect
6 Likes
2.9k views
USDemocraticPartyBlueVault
258,708 views
5,538 Discussing
USNonFarmPayrollReport
41.2M views
162,534 Discussing
