陆之昂赚大饼

Just now a friend said that in the company, those who work hard to solve problems are like cattle and horses, while those who flatter can rise to positions. This topic is very, very interesting, and if expanded upon, could fill half a book. I'll just say a few words, please bear with me if I'm wrong. First, in various organizations, units, and companies, we must first regard the 'leaders' distributed among them as 'people'. The vast majority are actually ordinary people. They have the strengths, weaknesses, and shortcomings of ordinary people. Do not regard 'leaders' as saints or gods. Expecting them to be moral and to keep away from the immoral, expecting them to understand people and assign responsibilities well, expecting them to be like Bo Le (the legendary horse judge). It is important to know that since ancient times, while good horses are easy to find, good judges are hard to come by, which is based on factual foundations. Second, you need to understand how 'people' think. If you put yourself in their shoes, you will understand. Now there are two people waiting for promotion. One person often communicates with you, asking for instructions in the morning and reporting back in the evening. They are particularly attentive to your matters, caring and inquiring about your well-being, providing both material and spiritual support during holidays. It seems they respect you, like you, admire you, and acknowledge you, appearing to be 'your person', appearing very loyal to you. However, their ability to get things done is lacking. The other person is more capable, even stronger than you. But usually, they ignore you. They often challenge you in meetings, expressing dissatisfaction with many of your actions. It seems that if they ever gain power, your days will not be easy. I ask you, if you were the leader, which one would you choose? Would you really choose the latter for the sake of the unit's interests? Third, if you can't do what the first person does and just thinking about it makes you feel disgusted, does that mean you have no hope in your life? Of course not. It can only be said that that unit is not suitable for you. Where there are people, there are relationships, but some places indeed value ability more. If you truly have ability, you can rise. Some places focus more on relationships, and without connections, it's hard to move an inch. This is why capable young people are eager to go to big cities like Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen, rather than return to small county towns. They have hope of using their ability to stand out in first-tier cities, while returning to a small county town controlled by a closed circle might mean they can't even find a job. If you have real ability, go to a place where you can eat based on your abilities. Although it can't be said that you will definitely thrive, at least your abilities will make you feel much more comfortable in places that value abilities more. Of course, an organization cannot be composed entirely of incompetent people who only know how to flatter. Otherwise, this organization will certainly decline in the long run. Therefore, in a normal unit, there must be at least some people or leaders who truly have the ability to solve problems. The more capable people there are, the better the unit or company can develop. Fewer capable people lead to mediocrity. Still, the point is that if you want to make money and climb up, you have to help people solve problems. Either help leaders solve their problems, help the company tackle tricky issues, or help clients resolve their problems. Wherever your strengths lie, think about how to help others solve problems. Your ability to help others solve problems is stronger than others; what you can achieve is better than others, and you will naturally not be ignored for long and can realize your own value. Of course, the most important thing is that you indeed have outstanding abilities. If everyone's abilities are similar, any leader will favor those who get along well with them. Otherwise, who will come close to them and help them solve problems?

Recent thoughts on "spending money." Leaving aside other places, here alone, there are definitely many friends who dislike spending money, preferring to save and let their money appreciate. Generally speaking, this isn't wrong. But for those of you with money, have you ever thought about this question: What is money actually for? Money is essentially a general equivalent used to exchange for goods, services, and experiences. It's just a piece of paper or a number; it has no inherent use. It only has value when it's used for exchange. Therefore, how you spend your money on the most worthwhile things is crucial. Have you ever considered that when you leave this world, the money you leave behind will be wasted? Give it to your children? You can give it to your children early; I'm talking about what's rightfully yours. You could have used it to exchange for goods, services, and experiences. Besides, there are some things you won't want to experience when you're young, even when you're old and wealthy. What I want to say is, balance is key. Don't live off your savings, and don't become a miser. If you didn't know how to balance it before, now use a withdrawal calculator to figure it out. This topic is actually very, very meaningful for everyone. Many people haven't really thought about this seriously; they just act on instinct, spending money recklessly or saving it desperately. Recently, another thought has arisen. I often donate to various organizations, like donating after withdrawing from my online fund, which I've posted about on Weibo before. Now I have a new idea. Instead of helping people far away, why not start by helping those close to me? For example, a distant relative of mine is struggling financially. Recently, I arranged some work for their college-aged child, paying them well above the market average. (Note: this kind of help absolutely cannot be given directly; the child must perform some tasks.) Now, not only do they not need any financial assistance from their family, but with my guidance, they've also established a recovery fund. In the near future, they'll not only be able to pay off their debts but also have money to save and invest. In this way, the fate of a family within my reach could potentially change. I don't have much money, yet I can help those around me like this; you wealthy people should also look around and help those you can.Compatible relatives and friends are fine (but don't be overly proactive or enthusiastic, and don't give money away for nothing). Also, you wealthy people should spend more. If you end up with more money than you can spend, it's a complete waste. The money you work so hard to earn, like a slave, will be gone the day you leave this world if you don't spend it—isn't that ridiculous? Wouldn't all that work have been for nothing? Try using an ATM calculator; spend as much as you can. Wealthy people should spend more and help others, while those aspiring to wealth should save more and invest more. Common prosperity is the best outcome. Otherwise, no one will benefit in the end.

In simple terms, I believe the essence of making money from stocks is
Why, from a global perspective, stocks as a whole are the most profitable category.
I agree with this conclusion. However, there is a prerequisite.
that is, stocks as a whole are the most profitable. However, most stocks do not make money. There are two issues that prove this.
First, the components of the Dow Jones index from 100 years ago are no longer included. In fact, most of those 30 companies that were the best at the time have disappeared.
Second, the number of listed stocks in the US market is actually fewer than in previous years. With so many IPOs, the number of companies has decreased, what does this mean?