@cz_binance Start elderly people playing memes, create a test token.
$TST is on spot, you say CZ's mind has changed, embracing memes now.
I'll wait and see.
2.0:
You say $GIGGLE is CZ's life's work.
I think giggle, through community spread, will gain influence, list on the main platform as a symbolic milestone, and trigger fee donations for rebates. Use influence to help charity for free.
I'll take profits, you go crypto for good, while giggle has already gone good.
3.0:
You say Binance life is fading, this time we can't launch a Chinese meme again.
CZ's book will definitely be named $币安人生 .
I believe Binance is just one part of CZ's life; he's not only a founder, but also a father and a charity leader.
Life is like this—what you see as bright ahead, I see as muddy underfoot.
@cz_binance Start elderly people playing memes, create a test token.
$TST is on spot, you say CZ's mind has changed, embracing memes now.
I'll wait and see.
2.0:
You say $GIGGLE is CZ's life's work.
I think giggle, through community spread, will gain influence, list on the main platform as a symbolic milestone, and trigger fee donations for rebates. Use influence to help charity for free.
I'll take profits, you go crypto for good, while giggle has already gone good.
3.0:
You say Binance life is fading, this time we can't launch a Chinese meme again.
CZ's book will definitely be named $币安人生 .
I believe Binance is just one part of CZ's life; he's not only a founder, but also a father and a charity leader.
Life is like this—what you see as bright ahead, I see as muddy underfoot.
Me and the girls —— What a miserable life I used to have.
Last year, many memorable moments happened in the group:
A group member who made 230k profit left the group, thanking me.
I helped my girlfriend trade profitably all night, only to be asked the next day if I could help her boyfriend get profitable too.
……
At first, all my strategies were fully transparent. As long as group members weren't asking for fortune-telling or systemic issues, I would answer any question.
There were countless backstabs.
This year, I'm going to switch to closed-door trading, offering some profitable opportunities to members with smaller funds, and assigning an assistant to help those with less sharp minds translate and interpret information.
So I'm planning to hire a female assistant to help me organize some information.
Things like Step-by-step guides from @StandX_Official, the Egg-Splitting Master.
My good days are here — turns out I have so many female fans.
Group members asked why I always have so many female followers — a simple question.
Male fans reach out, but I'm always too busy.
I spend my days checking out legs, deeply discussing experiences, and subtly segmenting the community.
Since starting my own business, nearly all my colleagues have been women. I've met quite a few 35-year-old female students, only to find out later they were driving school students.
I'm still the same young man I was, happy to be with the girls.
I want to study @Web3Feng's tweets.
I'm still a bit rusty and afraid I might miss the mark.
As shown in the image, I've interviewed four girls, and three more haven't been scheduled yet.
Last Thursday evening, I discussed this year's trading strategy on the square, particularly highlighting gold:
I started calling for gold after selling BTC in August, and this year's main focus has been on the profit-taking logic for gold and the hedging system (IF+ELSE) in response to related risks.
People keep saying that this year will see rate cuts and liquidity injections, just like those who previously claimed the government would open the floodgates with massive liquidity—back then, I shorted Bitcoin from $9.3 to $8.58. (No hindsight; go check it yourself.)
The logic behind this year's profit-taking and cross-domain hedging discussed in the live stream may revolve around three aspects:
1. The liquidity trap.
Is RMP's liquidity injection a trap? We can refer to the 2019 liquidity injection, cash crunch, and emergency money printing.
2. Is the era of weak USD, high inflation, and rising US Treasury yields repeating Reagan 2.0?
3. Will the mid-term election be bullish? Trump 1.0 didn't even pay much attention to it.
Therefore, gold is not yet time to take profits. This position was opened when choosing between Bitcoin and gold at $8.35.
The majority of physical gold still has a cost basis between $2500 and $3700, and none has been sold yet.
$XAU
alert的会所
--
Gold OR Bitcoin?
The most frequently asked question recently is whether gold can be bought now?
The most articles I have seen recently are about the comparison of returns between gold, BTC, and U.S. stocks.
Just like I sold my large pancake in August, I called gold for 4 months, and many group friends are still asking where to buy gold?
The purpose of saying this is not to PUA your execution issues; the essence is:
Not understanding trading expectations and logic, so not attempting, skipping the process and hitting the result directly.
Now gold has already broken through the historical high, reaching above 4400, and the logic that should exist is only in the process of verification, without change.
Currently, the only situation where gold can have a low point is a liquidity crisis.
The principle is that gold is not inherently currency, currency is inherently gold.
The methodology is to reference the three-part series of gold trading in the tweets.
Today's article does not post gold's returns; if someone really thinks that trading gold is more suitable than large pancakes now, or if they missed my strong call on gold this time, they can slide back in time to see all my articles on gold, to review how they missed it, rather than simply attributing it to initial laziness, which is very helpful for subsequent trading.
If you think this is nonsense literature, it doesn't matter; trading is your own business.
$XAU also has contracts that can be verified.
If you remember what I said, look at the pancake to do E and other achievements (at that time I closed Tesla on MSX), you can also understand my macro tweets: seemingly prosperous is also proof of prosperity.
Many of my trades are systematic, involving asset allocation, expectation management, risk preference, etc.
Therefore, I have never felt it is a bear market; a bear market is one without hope (except for what the diode says you can short), while gold asset allocation and cross-domain hedging fill me with hope.
That being said, in the trading system, drawing lines is just a technique.
Take $BREV as an example: discussing risk control and adjustment after price deviates from trading expectations.
Most group members have no expectations of their own; they treat me as their expectation. As long as the price is better than mine, they feel it's safe.
When prices fluctuate, they rush to secure profits—this is the norm, no matter how many times I've said it.
Today, group members discussed the 'techniques' and 'principles' in trading. I've explained in detail all the 'techniques'—price spread logic, valuation logic, order book logic, etc.
The difference is that group members who take me as their expectation forget these techniques within days, let alone cultivating the 'principles' that come after mastering them.
Back to the example:
1. Short position after the up move.
I closed the pre-market position a few days ago and checked it myself. Here, I still chose to go short after the up move.
Good news has been released, and the absence of further positive news is itself negative.
It's a simple fundamental logic. Let's return to objective evidence.
After the up move, there is a basis spread, and the spread is widening, with an increasing term structure.
The spot order book is balanced with sufficient depth. This is not a price gap artificially created by pulling up futures via spot without placing buy orders, so I chose to enter.
Also, the fee rate is gradually moving away from -2%. Whether it's capped or not is a matter from several versions ago, just serving as a reference.
At 0.4848, I took a position.
2. The entry point for adding to the position.
0.5346 is the entry point for adding. The logic of actively blowing up the short position hasn't changed.
Based on the project's scoring, only 'prove' can be considered a comparable valuation in the same sector.
After my previous calculation, the valuation of the new token after BN+UP (see earlier text), an average price above 0.5 is relatively safe, and I aim to keep the average around 0.517.
Here, my position size was slightly larger, as I already had a small position above.
3. Risk control through position management.
I took two fees above 1.5% without mistake, and the fees alone ate up over 1700U.
Around 19:50 in the evening, for a few seconds, the fee rate suddenly dropped to -2%.
I suspect it was manipulated by placing spot buy/sell orders to control the fee rate, reduce the open interest of derivatives short positions, and thus manage market value.
I closed part of the position at 0.505, using the locked-in profit to offset the fee loss.
Re-entered at the same position size and a better price, returning to my original expectation.
Set a stop-loss and went to sleep.
Currently, profit is 8,000 USD—not a big win, but fees alone were nearly 1,000 USD in one night.
Wait and see what happens below 0.4.
No hindsight bias. Feel free to join my xx group.
Just kidding—I don't do rebates, don't manage trades, and the group is closed.
Take $BREV as an example: discussing risk control and adjustment after price deviates from trading expectations.
Most group members have no expectations of their own; they treat me as their expectation. As long as the price is better than mine, they feel it's safe.
When prices fluctuate, they rush to secure profits—this is the norm, no matter how many times I've said it.
Today, group members discussed the 'techniques' and 'principles' in trading. I've explained in detail all the 'techniques'—price spread logic, valuation logic, order book logic, etc.
The difference is that group members who take me as their expectation forget these techniques within days, let alone cultivating the 'principles' that come after mastering them.
Back to the example:
1. Short position after the up move.
I closed the pre-market position a few days ago and checked it myself. Here, I still chose to go short after the up move.
Good news has been released, and the absence of further positive news is itself negative.
It's a simple fundamental logic. Let's return to objective evidence.
After the up move, there is a basis spread, and the spread is widening, with an increasing term structure.
The spot order book is balanced with sufficient depth. This is not a price gap artificially created by pulling up futures via spot without placing buy orders, so I chose to enter.
Also, the fee rate is gradually moving away from -2%. Whether it's capped or not is a matter from several versions ago, just serving as a reference.
At 0.4848, I took a position.
2. The entry point for adding to the position.
0.5346 is the entry point for adding. The logic of actively blowing up the short position hasn't changed.
Based on the project's scoring, only 'prove' can be considered a comparable valuation in the same sector.
After my previous calculation, the valuation of the new token after BN+UP (see earlier text), an average price above 0.5 is relatively safe, and I aim to keep the average around 0.517.
Here, my position size was slightly larger, as I already had a small position above.
3. Risk control through position management.
I took two fees above 1.5% without mistake, and the fees alone ate up over 1700U.
Around 19:50 in the evening, for a few seconds, the fee rate suddenly dropped to -2%.
I suspect it was manipulated by placing spot buy/sell orders to control the fee rate, reduce the open interest of derivatives short positions, and thus manage market value.
I closed part of the position at 0.505, using the locked-in profit to offset the fee loss.
Re-entered at the same position size and a better price, returning to my original expectation.
Set a stop-loss and went to sleep.
Currently, profit is 8,000 USD—not a big win, but fees alone were nearly 1,000 USD in one night.
Wait and see what happens below 0.4.
No hindsight bias. Feel free to join my xx group.
Just kidding—I don't do rebates, don't manage trades, and the group is closed.
Currently, the $rave price of 0.31 has broken out of the grid range, with excessive fluctuations, resulting in a loss. The grid short position has been closed.
Yesterday, I decided not to hold through the -1% fee, and due to a thin order book with potential accumulation of orders leading to a short squeeze, I closed the contract position.
Every day, I buy from my wallet between 0.16 and 0.26 at the opening.
Then I short at 0.71, and the grid short above 0.66, but it broke out at 0.33, and the profit was not as high as I had expected.
Review:
First, it was early December, a poor market period, with the minimum precision on the contract order book often in single digits, and various contracts were extremely volatile. I was worried about generating exaggerated expectations.
Second, $rave is very active on @Aster_DEX, possibly climbing the ladder. At the same time, it has also been boosted with tokens, so I was concerned about creating an expectation of both an OK spot and a conditional spot listing.
Therefore, I didn't allocate a large initial position. The returns were average, but the timing was acceptable.
The grid system gives me the feeling that it generally doesn't require much attention. I won't close the grid due to a sudden increase in fees, and having clear expectations makes me feel more confident.
I also plan to experiment with the grid strategy on the next new token for the grand slam.
alert的会所
--
Waking up feels so numb!
I bought 20,000 for 160m $RAVE , then sold it for over 10,000 at 256m, now it's 560m.
Going to bed early and waking up early is good for health, but my erectile dysfunction has become more serious.
Selling high is always profitable, selling high is always profitable.
I feel like I support quite a few aggregation groups, aggregating the trades I made.
But the aggregation group really messes with your mindset, one person from the aggregation group came over to ask me about trading.
You’re using the aggregation group and have pirated stuff, and then come to ask the main person about trading, and the main person has already sold high.
$LIT expected a massive profit sell-off, but the single-machine market held it, shorting from 3 to 2.6, hesitated for a bit, pocketed nearly $4000, as mentioned before.
$BREV hit my stop loss, after the holder news I manually closed my position, closing price 0.4267.
Initial expectation: @brevis_zk's money is expected to be related to activities with @buidlpad, whether it's a pre-sale or deposit, basically from bp--it's a direct line to spot.
Therefore, if there is no relevant activity page, TGE is necessary, at least I don't expect day 1 spot, or difficult spot.
While discussing this trading expectation, many group friends hope to see my price open, or to supplement after it goes up, this habit is very bad.
Here, time is more important than space, specifically discussed before.
The selling pressure from holders is not large, and the initial circulation control is acceptable, decisively stop-loss without looking, with a maximum profit of 2700.
$RAVE profit of 4900, I don’t want to endure the immediate 1% fee, already closed the position.
Recently, trades are basically closed, this cross-year trade hasn’t made much profit, retreated a bit, but fortunately did not incur large losses.
Here's to a new year.
alert的会所
--
The fluctuations are quite large. Originally, the maximum profit from two orders was 8000 dollars.
Now it's down to this terrible state.
$RAVE has been stuck, after all, Rave is the first on @Aster_DEX for the USD1 pair, and everyone's expectations for it are still very high.
From the trading volume of this new coin on Rave, which is also the highest, it seems better to hold on for now.
$LIT There aren't many profit opportunities with such a large opening. Brother Sun also bought in; let’s just set a high stop-loss or close the position to secure some profits.
@brevis_zk This pre-market BP deviates from expectations, holding the initial position; at this time, timing is more important than space. $BREV
Making money is really hard; after a few days, I can only earn some pocket money.
The fluctuations are quite large. Originally, the maximum profit from two orders was 8000 dollars.
Now it's down to this terrible state.
$RAVE has been stuck, after all, Rave is the first on @Aster_DEX for the USD1 pair, and everyone's expectations for it are still very high.
From the trading volume of this new coin on Rave, which is also the highest, it seems better to hold on for now.
$LIT There aren't many profit opportunities with such a large opening. Brother Sun also bought in; let’s just set a high stop-loss or close the position to secure some profits.
@brevis_zk This pre-market BP deviates from expectations, holding the initial position; at this time, timing is more important than space. $BREV
Making money is really hard; after a few days, I can only earn some pocket money.
alert的会所
--
On the 30th, I published next year's trading ideas on Twitter, and I didn't expect everyone to be so enthusiastic, with over 80,000 views.
I have looked at many people's predictions, and for me, trading and investing are both systematic.
It’s not just a few simple reasons like next year’s monetary easing or the mid-term elections driving the market.
My asset allocation is also diversified, including Bitcoin, gold, US stocks (not much on individual stocks), and what hedging mechanisms are in place under certain conditions.
If you want to attract traffic, you have to be dumb enough; I’m not pursuing that traffic, what matters more is the trading system.
There aren't many traders on Twitter who do not rebate commissions or play the hindsight game.
Regardless of whether my trading is good or not, I'm not trying to take advantage of you; the content is still decent.
Even if you aggregate groups and steal my trades, I don’t mind.
I also pick out the common questions from group friends to answer.
Recently, almost all traders have stopped trading, and 60% of the content output in the aggregation group is mine.
Today, my thought process on $LIT was aggregated, and when I opened it, it was a big deal.
The result of the helping mentality is a face-to-face big opening and idiots treating you as if it's expected.
From today onwards, I will abandon the helping mentality and start a new chapter in promoting oil.
I will continue to not rebate commissions, not charge fees, and close the group.
On the 30th, I published next year's trading ideas on Twitter, and I didn't expect everyone to be so enthusiastic, with over 80,000 views.
I have looked at many people's predictions, and for me, trading and investing are both systematic.
It’s not just a few simple reasons like next year’s monetary easing or the mid-term elections driving the market.
My asset allocation is also diversified, including Bitcoin, gold, US stocks (not much on individual stocks), and what hedging mechanisms are in place under certain conditions.
If you want to attract traffic, you have to be dumb enough; I’m not pursuing that traffic, what matters more is the trading system.
There aren't many traders on Twitter who do not rebate commissions or play the hindsight game.
Regardless of whether my trading is good or not, I'm not trying to take advantage of you; the content is still decent.
Even if you aggregate groups and steal my trades, I don’t mind.
I also pick out the common questions from group friends to answer.
Recently, almost all traders have stopped trading, and 60% of the content output in the aggregation group is mine.
Today, my thought process on $LIT was aggregated, and when I opened it, it was a big deal.
The result of the helping mentality is a face-to-face big opening and idiots treating you as if it's expected.
From today onwards, I will abandon the helping mentality and start a new chapter in promoting oil.
I will continue to not rebate commissions, not charge fees, and close the group.