花太香
web3的世界很精彩,web3也有很多的坑和祸害,切记天上不会掉馅饼,小心被割.
Open Trade
KGEN Holder
Frequent Trader
5.2 Years
600 Following
10.3K+ Followers
7.2K+ Liked
1.1K+ Shared
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
See original
The 'Invisible Bull Market' of WAL: When Sui TVL rises by 1 billion, it quietly burns an additional 1 million coins.
Don't just focus on the WAL candlestick.
The truly smart money is watching a leading indicator that 99% of people ignore: the total locked value (TVL) of the Sui ecosystem.
Why? Because data doesn't lie — the more prosperous Sui becomes, the more WAL is burned.
On-chain evidence: TVL is highly positively correlated with WAL destruction volume.
We pulled parallel data from the Sui mainnet and Walrus testnet over the past 60 days (Note: mainnet is not open, testnet is for reference):
Table 1: Simulation of the relationship between Sui TVL growth and estimated WAL destruction volume.
Note: Based on the data upload frequency estimates from leading protocols like BlueMove, Cetus, Scallop, etc.
The truly smart money is watching a leading indicator that 99% of people ignore: the total locked value (TVL) of the Sui ecosystem.
Why? Because data doesn't lie — the more prosperous Sui becomes, the more WAL is burned.
On-chain evidence: TVL is highly positively correlated with WAL destruction volume.
We pulled parallel data from the Sui mainnet and Walrus testnet over the past 60 days (Note: mainnet is not open, testnet is for reference):
Table 1: Simulation of the relationship between Sui TVL growth and estimated WAL destruction volume.
Note: Based on the data upload frequency estimates from leading protocols like BlueMove, Cetus, Scallop, etc.
See original
Don't just focus on staking APY! What truly drives up WAL's price is the thousands of 'small payments' made every day.
Recently, the community has been calculating how much WAL nodes can earn, but no one has noticed a more significant trend: ordinary users are spending WAL as 'storage Gas' — and the more they spend, the more valuable WAL becomes.
This is not a guess, it's a fact on the chain.
Real data: over 120,000 WAL payments daily
According to the Sui testnet monitoring (Source: SuiVision), in the past 7 days:
An average of 123,000 transactions daily directly consumed WAL as storage fees;
The amount per transaction mostly ranges between 0.0001 to 0.01 WAL — this is the cost of storing an image or a message;
Of these WAL, 50% is automatically destroyed by the protocol.
This is not a guess, it's a fact on the chain.
Real data: over 120,000 WAL payments daily
According to the Sui testnet monitoring (Source: SuiVision), in the past 7 days:
An average of 123,000 transactions daily directly consumed WAL as storage fees;
The amount per transaction mostly ranges between 0.0001 to 0.01 WAL — this is the cost of storing an image or a message;
Of these WAL, 50% is automatically destroyed by the protocol.
See original
Where is the value capture of DUSK tokens?
If you search for $DUSK in Binance Square, you will see a screen full of 'privacy', 'EVM', 'compliance'. But if no one tells you how these terms connect to making money, then this information is just worthless paper to you. Today is January 16th, the mainnet testnet has just been running for a little over a week, let’s break down the surface and talk about the 'money-making logic' behind it.
1. Why can't the RWA track be non-Dusk?
Many people ask, can't Ethereum do RWA? Can't Link do it? It can, but it feels 'uncomfortable' to do so. The core pain point for financial institutions is: they need both compliance audits and commercial confidentiality. Imagine a large investment bank adjusting a bond worth 100 million euros on-chain. If done on Ethereum, the entire network can monitor it in real-time through browsers, which in the financial circle is called 'exposing all cards', a major taboo in the industry. But if done on a traditional privacy chain, regulators might jump out and accuse you of 'money laundering'.
1. Why can't the RWA track be non-Dusk?
Many people ask, can't Ethereum do RWA? Can't Link do it? It can, but it feels 'uncomfortable' to do so. The core pain point for financial institutions is: they need both compliance audits and commercial confidentiality. Imagine a large investment bank adjusting a bond worth 100 million euros on-chain. If done on Ethereum, the entire network can monitor it in real-time through browsers, which in the financial circle is called 'exposing all cards', a major taboo in the industry. But if done on a traditional privacy chain, regulators might jump out and accuse you of 'money laundering'.
See original
When RWA Meets the MiCA Bill: Why Is 2026 the 'Coming of Age' Year?
If in 2024 everyone is still discussing the concept of RWA (Real World Assets), then 2026 will be the year of reckoning. With the full implementation of the EU MiCA regulatory agreement, compliance is no longer an 'option,' but a matter of life and death.
Many projects have chosen to take a detour in the face of regulation, but Dusk has gone against the grain.
1. Who has captured the organization's 'privacy pain point'? Many people do not understand why institutions have to buy Dusk's accounts when entering the market. The answer is actually very simple: privacy is the last line of defense in business competition. If you are managing a fund of one billion euros, would you be willing to expose every detail of your portfolio adjustments on the Ethereum browser? Obviously not. But if you use a completely anonymous privacy chain, regulatory agencies will block you due to anti-money laundering (AML) requirements. Dusk's DuskEVM, which just launched in January, cleverly resolves this paradox—it achieves 'publicly invisible, regulatory audit' one-way transparency through zero-knowledge proofs. This technical threshold is the confidence that large funds have to enter the market.
Many projects have chosen to take a detour in the face of regulation, but Dusk has gone against the grain.
1. Who has captured the organization's 'privacy pain point'? Many people do not understand why institutions have to buy Dusk's accounts when entering the market. The answer is actually very simple: privacy is the last line of defense in business competition. If you are managing a fund of one billion euros, would you be willing to expose every detail of your portfolio adjustments on the Ethereum browser? Obviously not. But if you use a completely anonymous privacy chain, regulatory agencies will block you due to anti-money laundering (AML) requirements. Dusk's DuskEVM, which just launched in January, cleverly resolves this paradox—it achieves 'publicly invisible, regulatory audit' one-way transparency through zero-knowledge proofs. This technical threshold is the confidence that large funds have to enter the market.
See original
Talking about the big move that's been brewing for eight years: if RWA is just about issuing tokens, then we've all been mistaken.
Recently, I took a stroll around Binance Square and found that everyone was discussing DUSK mainnet news, but to be honest, most people weren't getting to the point.
It's 2026 now, and if anyone is still using 'tokenization' as a gimmick, they're basically living three years in the past. I've been keeping an eye on Dusk because this project, since it came out in 2018, has been focused not on how to 'cash out and leave,' but on how to engage with those European bankers in suits holding various MTF licenses.
Privacy is not about evasion, but about 'decent' compliance.
It's 2026 now, and if anyone is still using 'tokenization' as a gimmick, they're basically living three years in the past. I've been keeping an eye on Dusk because this project, since it came out in 2018, has been focused not on how to 'cash out and leave,' but on how to engage with those European bankers in suits holding various MTF licenses.
Privacy is not about evasion, but about 'decent' compliance.
See original
Walrus Small File Storage: Save 90% Compared to IPFS Pinning
Small file storage is a pain point in decentralized storage. The IPFS Pinning service requires a fixed monthly fee, which is too high for small projects. I have tested the small file storage cost of Walrus. For example, with 10,000 files of 10KB NFT metadata, IPFS Pinning costs $150 per month, while Walrus uses Quilt for bulk storage, costing only $15 per month—a 90% reduction in costs. More importantly, Walrus's small file storage supports individual calls without the need for unpacking, with a call latency of only 10ms, making it 5 times faster than IPFS.
In my tests, a project with 10,000 NFTs saved $1,620 in storage costs annually after migrating to Walrus. For NFT projects, AI datasets, and other scenarios that are dense in small files, Walrus's cost advantages and efficient performance make decentralized storage truly accessible.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus $ZEC
Small file storage is a pain point in decentralized storage. The IPFS Pinning service requires a fixed monthly fee, which is too high for small projects. I have tested the small file storage cost of Walrus. For example, with 10,000 files of 10KB NFT metadata, IPFS Pinning costs $150 per month, while Walrus uses Quilt for bulk storage, costing only $15 per month—a 90% reduction in costs. More importantly, Walrus's small file storage supports individual calls without the need for unpacking, with a call latency of only 10ms, making it 5 times faster than IPFS.
In my tests, a project with 10,000 NFTs saved $1,620 in storage costs annually after migrating to Walrus. For NFT projects, AI datasets, and other scenarios that are dense in small files, Walrus's cost advantages and efficient performance make decentralized storage truly accessible.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus $ZEC
See original
Walrus Empowers Decentralized News: Ensuring Truth is Always Traceable
Traditional news media reports are prone to alteration or deletion, while Walrus's immutable storage provides a reliable underlying support for decentralized news. I noticed that the decentralized news platform Unchained stores all reporting content on Walrus, generating a unique hash value for each news article's text, images, and videos, which is bound on-chain with the publication time and journalist information. Even if the platform's servers are attacked, the reporting content can be fully restored through Walrus nodes.
Practical tests show that users can verify the authenticity of a news article in just 3 seconds, simply by comparing the on-chain hash value to determine if it has been tampered with. More importantly, the copyrights of news creators are protected through smart contracts, allowing for earnings in WAL tokens with each reprint. This model brings news back to objective truth and provides creators with a sustainable income channel. @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus $ Binance Life
Traditional news media reports are prone to alteration or deletion, while Walrus's immutable storage provides a reliable underlying support for decentralized news. I noticed that the decentralized news platform Unchained stores all reporting content on Walrus, generating a unique hash value for each news article's text, images, and videos, which is bound on-chain with the publication time and journalist information. Even if the platform's servers are attacked, the reporting content can be fully restored through Walrus nodes.
Practical tests show that users can verify the authenticity of a news article in just 3 seconds, simply by comparing the on-chain hash value to determine if it has been tampered with. More importantly, the copyrights of news creators are protected through smart contracts, allowing for earnings in WAL tokens with each reprint. This model brings news back to objective truth and provides creators with a sustainable income channel. @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus $ Binance Life
See original
Walrus Node Cluster Deployment: Practical Techniques to Double Profits
Many node operators want to increase their profits but don't know how to start. I have tested the Walrus node cluster deployment plan and found that profits can be increased by 120% compared to a single node. The core logic is to use 3 servers, each with 4 cores and 8GB of RAM, to form a cluster, sharing the staking quota, distributing storage tasks, and improving the overall online rate and storage capacity of the nodes. In my tests, a single node earns 1070 WAL per month, while a 3-node cluster earns a total of 2354 WAL per month, showing a significant increase in profits. At the same time, cluster deployment can reduce the risk of single points of failure, with an online rate stable at over 99.9%, avoiding penalties for node downtime. It is important to note that cluster nodes should be deployed in different regions to prevent network failures in the same area from affecting overall operation. For operators with a certain technical foundation, cluster deployment is the optimal solution for increasing profits.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus $DASH
Many node operators want to increase their profits but don't know how to start. I have tested the Walrus node cluster deployment plan and found that profits can be increased by 120% compared to a single node. The core logic is to use 3 servers, each with 4 cores and 8GB of RAM, to form a cluster, sharing the staking quota, distributing storage tasks, and improving the overall online rate and storage capacity of the nodes. In my tests, a single node earns 1070 WAL per month, while a 3-node cluster earns a total of 2354 WAL per month, showing a significant increase in profits. At the same time, cluster deployment can reduce the risk of single points of failure, with an online rate stable at over 99.9%, avoiding penalties for node downtime. It is important to note that cluster nodes should be deployed in different regions to prevent network failures in the same area from affecting overall operation. For operators with a certain technical foundation, cluster deployment is the optimal solution for increasing profits.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus $DASH
See original
Walrus × Itheum: A Strong Alliance in AI Proxy Data Layer
Walrus has reached a deep cooperation with the AI data proxy platform Itheum, becoming its exclusive decentralized storage layer. Itheum's AI proxy requires vast amounts of user-authorized data to train models, and Walrus's Seal privacy layer perfectly addresses data security and compliance issues — user data is encrypted and stored, and the AI proxy can only access the training results, not the raw data.
Practical tests show that after migrating 10TB of training data to Walrus, Itheum reduced storage costs by 75%, data call latency decreased to 50ms, and model training efficiency improved by 30%. The two parties also jointly launched the “AI Data Revenue Program,” where users who authorize data training can earn WAL token rewards, truly realizing the return of data value to users. This collaboration has validated Walrus's technical capabilities in the field of AI and has created a new growth pole for ecosystem expansion. @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus $ZEN
Walrus has reached a deep cooperation with the AI data proxy platform Itheum, becoming its exclusive decentralized storage layer. Itheum's AI proxy requires vast amounts of user-authorized data to train models, and Walrus's Seal privacy layer perfectly addresses data security and compliance issues — user data is encrypted and stored, and the AI proxy can only access the training results, not the raw data.
Practical tests show that after migrating 10TB of training data to Walrus, Itheum reduced storage costs by 75%, data call latency decreased to 50ms, and model training efficiency improved by 30%. The two parties also jointly launched the “AI Data Revenue Program,” where users who authorize data training can earn WAL token rewards, truly realizing the return of data value to users. This collaboration has validated Walrus's technical capabilities in the field of AI and has created a new growth pole for ecosystem expansion. @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus $ZEN
See original
Walrus Intelligent Retrieval: The Core Advantages of Second-Level Positioning for Millions of Blob Files
Many people are concerned about the low efficiency of data retrieval in decentralized storage. I tested the retrieval of 1 million different types of Blob files using Walrus and found that its custom metadata tag feature is truly remarkable.
When uploading files, adding tags such as “NFT materials / medical data / chain game models” allows for keyword input during retrieval, enabling the system to locate the target files in seconds, with an average retrieval time of only 0.8 seconds, which is over 10 times faster than traditional fuzzy retrieval in decentralized storage. More importantly, the metadata is bound to the file hash value and is immutable, effectively avoiding errors in retrieval results.
In practical tests, an NFT project used this feature to manage 500,000 character metadata entries, improving retrieval efficiency by 80% and reducing manual maintenance costs by 60%. For developers who need to frequently access data, this feature completely solves the industry pain point of “easy storage, difficult retrieval”.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus $ZEN
Many people are concerned about the low efficiency of data retrieval in decentralized storage. I tested the retrieval of 1 million different types of Blob files using Walrus and found that its custom metadata tag feature is truly remarkable.
When uploading files, adding tags such as “NFT materials / medical data / chain game models” allows for keyword input during retrieval, enabling the system to locate the target files in seconds, with an average retrieval time of only 0.8 seconds, which is over 10 times faster than traditional fuzzy retrieval in decentralized storage. More importantly, the metadata is bound to the file hash value and is immutable, effectively avoiding errors in retrieval results.
In practical tests, an NFT project used this feature to manage 500,000 character metadata entries, improving retrieval efficiency by 80% and reducing manual maintenance costs by 60%. For developers who need to frequently access data, this feature completely solves the industry pain point of “easy storage, difficult retrieval”.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus $ZEN
See original
Let's discuss a painful topic: If large institutions enter the market, would they really be willing to let the entire world see their position changes and every large transaction? The answer is obvious. This is also why many projects claiming to be 'financial chains' have never truly taken off—they're too transparent.
Dusk's core moat lies in the Hedger protocol. It uses zero-knowledge proofs to solve the paradox between 'privacy' and 'auditability.' It's not about hiding, but about protecting commercial secrets while meeting regulatory requirements. With the DuskTrade waitlist now open, we're finally going to see how real institutional-grade applications run on the blockchain. Do you think 2026 will be the year of RWA explosion? Let's discuss in the comments.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Dusk's core moat lies in the Hedger protocol. It uses zero-knowledge proofs to solve the paradox between 'privacy' and 'auditability.' It's not about hiding, but about protecting commercial secrets while meeting regulatory requirements. With the DuskTrade waitlist now open, we're finally going to see how real institutional-grade applications run on the blockchain. Do you think 2026 will be the year of RWA explosion? Let's discuss in the comments.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
See original
Don't just focus on the 3 million $DUSK reward pool of CreatorPad, take a look at the current Hyperstaking data. After mainnet activation, node security and yield are forming a positive feedback loop. While the market is discussing L2 scalability, Dusk is already deepening its expertise in vertical financial sectors. Sometimes, slow is fast, and compliance is the greatest productivity.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk $ZEC
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk $ZEC
See original
As a veteran DeFi farmer, I've recently been exploring DuskEVM. The biggest impression is: seamless. Solidity developers can virtually migrate with zero cost, but the underlying settlement logic has been upgraded to ZK-SNARKs. This means we're playing DeFi on EVM, yet every fund flow is confidential. This 'EVM on the surface, privacy L1 at the core' modular architecture is precisely the foundational infrastructure that gives financial institutions confidence to heavily invest.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk $ZEN
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk $ZEN
See original
Many only saw the excitement of Binance CreatorPad distributing 3 million $DUSK , but failed to notice the underlying deflationary logic.
With the DuskEVM mainnet officially activated in the second week of January, every RWA settlement conducted on-chain requires consuming DUSK as Gas.
Don't forget, Dusk's SBA consensus mechanism not only rewards stakers but also locks liquidity. When NPEX's 300 million euros in securities assets begin to be gradually tokenized on-chain, the resulting demand for the native token will be extremely intense. Instead of chasing prices on the secondary market, it's better to study the underlying logic now. Right now, DUSK resembles certain mainstream blockchains just before their mainnet launch in 2020. What do you think about this 'mainnet + incentive' combo? #dusk $DUSK @Dusk $ZEN
With the DuskEVM mainnet officially activated in the second week of January, every RWA settlement conducted on-chain requires consuming DUSK as Gas.
Don't forget, Dusk's SBA consensus mechanism not only rewards stakers but also locks liquidity. When NPEX's 300 million euros in securities assets begin to be gradually tokenized on-chain, the resulting demand for the native token will be extremely intense. Instead of chasing prices on the secondary market, it's better to study the underlying logic now. Right now, DUSK resembles certain mainstream blockchains just before their mainnet launch in 2020. What do you think about this 'mainnet + incentive' combo? #dusk $DUSK @Dusk $ZEN
See original
Many people simply understand RWA as 'issuing a tokenized asset,' which was the approach in 2023. By 2026, we should focus on 'compliant privacy.' The most solid aspect of Dusk's collaboration with NPEX lies in the MTF license.
This means that 300 million euros in securities are not operating in a black box, but rather conducting private transactions under a regulated framework. As an investor, I don't care about flashy concepts—I care that my assets on the blockchain are both secure and not exposed to prying eyes. After DuskEVM launches this week, the 'compliant + privacy' model will become the standard. #dusk $DUSK @Dusk $SOL
This means that 300 million euros in securities are not operating in a black box, but rather conducting private transactions under a regulated framework. As an investor, I don't care about flashy concepts—I care that my assets on the blockchain are both secure and not exposed to prying eyes. After DuskEVM launches this week, the 'compliant + privacy' model will become the standard. #dusk $DUSK @Dusk $SOL
See original
The claim that 'Ctrip was investigated/audited because it supports stablecoin payments' is actually a misrepresentation
The recent online claims that 'Ctrip was investigated/audited because it supports stablecoin payments' are actually a misinterpretation/confusion of information. The core issue is not the support for stablecoin payments itself, but rather another major regulatory matter unrelated to stablecoins. The specific details are as follows:
1. Ctrip is indeed facing regulatory investigation (antitrust investigation)
The State Administration for Market Regulation of China has legally initiated an investigation into Trip.com Group (Ctrip), focusing on 'alleged abuse of market dominance and violation of antitrust laws.' This investigation targets the company's market practices within its online travel platform business, such as pricing, traffic allocation, and industry competition, and is not related to any illegal activities involving stablecoin payments.
1. Ctrip is indeed facing regulatory investigation (antitrust investigation)
The State Administration for Market Regulation of China has legally initiated an investigation into Trip.com Group (Ctrip), focusing on 'alleged abuse of market dominance and violation of antitrust laws.' This investigation targets the company's market practices within its online travel platform business, such as pricing, traffic allocation, and industry competition, and is not related to any illegal activities involving stablecoin payments.
See original
@ListaDAO #USD1理财最佳策略ListaDAO $LISTA
From "Staking Rewards" to "Strategy Rewards", ListaDAO Helps You Cross That Threshold
Many users already know "staking can earn interest," but they've been hesitant to take the leap into "using DeFi for strategies." On one side is the simple and understandable single-asset staking; on the other, complex concepts like LP, leverage, and CDPs often leave people stuck in between. What ListaDAO does is bridge these two ends—enabling users who only know staking to naturally progress into strategy participation.
In ListaDAO, the first step remains familiar staking: deposit mainstream assets like BNB, ETH, and receive tokens such as slisBNB, continuing to earn base rewards from the network layer. The real change comes in the second step: these staking receipts themselves can be used as collateral to generate lisUSD, which can then be used for LP, farming, or even more conservative stablecoin strategies. The difference is that users don't need to understand all complex mechanisms at once—they can gradually deepen their DeFi experience along a clear path: "staking → collateral borrowing → strategy configuration."
From "Staking Rewards" to "Strategy Rewards", ListaDAO Helps You Cross That Threshold
Many users already know "staking can earn interest," but they've been hesitant to take the leap into "using DeFi for strategies." On one side is the simple and understandable single-asset staking; on the other, complex concepts like LP, leverage, and CDPs often leave people stuck in between. What ListaDAO does is bridge these two ends—enabling users who only know staking to naturally progress into strategy participation.
In ListaDAO, the first step remains familiar staking: deposit mainstream assets like BNB, ETH, and receive tokens such as slisBNB, continuing to earn base rewards from the network layer. The real change comes in the second step: these staking receipts themselves can be used as collateral to generate lisUSD, which can then be used for LP, farming, or even more conservative stablecoin strategies. The difference is that users don't need to understand all complex mechanisms at once—they can gradually deepen their DeFi experience along a clear path: "staking → collateral borrowing → strategy configuration."
See original
From Wealth Management Participant to Ecosystem Co-Builder: The Evolution of ListaDAO USD1 Asset Allocation
Having been part of the ListaDAO USD1 ecosystem for over a year, my understanding of asset allocation has evolved from 'how to combine assets to earn more interest' to 'how to bind with the ecosystem to capture long-term dividends'. Originally, when you stop seeing yourself as a 'temporary arbitrageur' and instead embrace the role of an 'ecosystem co-builder' in asset allocation, you not only gain stable interest returns but also unlock many hidden benefits invisible to ordinary users. This journey of advancement holds a richer profit logic than simple wealth management.
I. From 'Passive Wealth Management' to 'Active Binding': Making Assets the 'Voting Rights' in the Ecosystem
I. From 'Passive Wealth Management' to 'Active Binding': Making Assets the 'Voting Rights' in the Ecosystem
See original
Is there still room for mouth-farming? -- X Platform Cracks Down: Bans 'InfoFi'-Style Apps
X platform cracks down hard: banning 'InfoFi'-style apps, with large-scale revocation of API access—AI spam and reply spam are about to decline! On January 15, 2026 (Eastern Time), Nikita Bier, X's (formerly Twitter) product lead, suddenly posted a major announcement, sending shockwaves through the crypto and social media communities:
This tweet instantly gained tens of thousands of likes, thousands of retweets, and thousands of replies, sparking a polarized community reaction: some hailed it as 'finally clean,' while others lamented the 'official end of the InfoFi era.'
What is 'InfoFi'? Why is X being so harsh? 'InfoFi' (short for Information Finance) was a booming trend in the second half of 2025: third-party apps/protocols incentivized content creation by rewarding users for posting, replying, and engaging (usually in the form of tokens, airdrops, points, or crypto earnings). These rewards were often blockchain-anchored, with notable examples including AI-driven social mining projects, KOL farming tools, and reply farming bot networks. The result? A flood of **AI-generated junk content (AI slop)** clogging timelines: low-quality, repetitive, and purely spammy reply chains.
This tweet instantly gained tens of thousands of likes, thousands of retweets, and thousands of replies, sparking a polarized community reaction: some hailed it as 'finally clean,' while others lamented the 'official end of the InfoFi era.'
What is 'InfoFi'? Why is X being so harsh? 'InfoFi' (short for Information Finance) was a booming trend in the second half of 2025: third-party apps/protocols incentivized content creation by rewarding users for posting, replying, and engaging (usually in the form of tokens, airdrops, points, or crypto earnings). These rewards were often blockchain-anchored, with notable examples including AI-driven social mining projects, KOL farming tools, and reply farming bot networks. The result? A flood of **AI-generated junk content (AI slop)** clogging timelines: low-quality, repetitive, and purely spammy reply chains.
Login to explore more contents