At the open position $REZ : Placed two limits for averaging 0.0055 and 0.00522. Also moved the stop to the level 0.004977. After the limit orders triggered, I will also adjust the take profits. Thank you for your trust😘
Generating zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) requires significant computational resources. If users have to wait tens of seconds for each confidential transaction or use expensive specialized hardware, #Dusk loses the battle for convenience against conventional L2 solutions. In the world of finance, where speed and low latency decide everything, heavy "privacy mathematics" can become an unbearable burden that blocks the widespread adoption of the protocol. #dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Main competitor #Dusk — not other blockchains, but private networks such as J.P. Morgan Onyx. Large capital finds it easier to use their own controlled chains rather than buying volatile token $DUSK to pay for gas. #dusk risks being left as a 'empty highway': technologically perfect, but an empty blockchain, since institutions choose safe and cheap internal banking solutions. #dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Tokenomics $DUSK in 2026 is held on Hyper Staking with a high APR. However, this is only delaying the problem: high inflation for staker payouts will eventually lead to mass selling. As soon as rewards drop, or large funds after unlocking start locking in profits, network liquidity could instantly evaporate, leaving the project without fuel for infrastructure development. #dusk $DUSK #Dusk @Dusk
#Dusk is trying to reconcile anonymity with MiCA, but it looks like an attempt to sit on two chairs. For regulators, transaction privacy is a "red flag" AML risk. If #Dusk implements backdoors for authorities to access data, it will lose the trust of the crypto community. If not, it risks receiving a "High Risk" status and ending up under a full ban on fiat withdrawals, becoming an isolated island for "grey" money. #dusk $DUSK @Dusk
#Dusk Place a bet on the Piecrust language and your own VM. But there lies the main risk: by creating a closed ZK-privacy ecosystem, the project becomes a "black box." If a bug arises in the code or an unnoticed token emission occurs, auditing will be nearly impossible due to the very nature of Zero-Knowledge. This creates a paradox: we must trust a system that cannot be fully verified from the outside, which is a critical risk for billion-dollar RWA funds. #dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Dusk Network 2026: Will the 'privacy economy' withstand the collision with financial giants? After the official mainnet launch on January 7, 2026, Dusk Network has finally moved from the realm of theoretical promises into the harsh environment of the free market. Despite six years of development and a unique architecture, the project has found itself at the epicenter of an economic storm. The question is no longer whether the ZK technology works, but whether the DUSK token can become a stable financial instrument, rather than just another speculative asset.
Dusk Network and the trap of legality: Why privacy might become a 'wolf in sheep's clothing'
Dusk Network and the trap of legality: Why privacy might become a 'wolf in sheep's clothing' in the world of big finance? Dusk Network positions itself as the first blockchain to meet regulatory requirements while maintaining full user privacy. However, the very idea of 'confidential compliance' sounds like a dangerous oxymoron to many experts. By trying to satisfy both crypto-anarchists and government regulators, Dusk risks isolation, becoming too suspicious for the former and too closed for the latter.
Labyrinths of Zero-Knowledge: Why Dusk's Technical Complexity Might Be Its Downfall?
Dusk Network has been supporting the status of one of the most anticipated projects in the field of confidential finance for several years. The promise of combining transaction privacy with strict compliance with regulatory requirements sounds like the 'Holy Grail' for institutional investors. However, if one takes a closer look under the hood of this mechanism, a serious question arises: isn't Dusk too complex a structure that risks falling apart under its own weight before even reaching the mass market?
#Walrus bet on the Red Stuff algorithm, promising reliability with minimal number of copies. But this is a risky game in terms of saving. Unlike competitors who fully duplicate data, #Walrus relies on the perfect operation of the network. If a significant part of the nodes simultaneously goes offline—due to regulatory ban or network failure #Sui —the 'mathematical magic' will fall apart. We trust our data to an algorithm that has never been tested by a real large-scale collapse, risking getting a set of unreadable digital fragments instead of files.
#Walrus aims to be a 'clean' project for corporations and AI companies, but this makes it vulnerable to censorship. Since nodes are identified in the Sui network, regulators can easily pressure major operators into removing 'unwanted' data segments. Instead of the promised Web3 freedom, we risk getting another censored cloud, where the right to existence of your information will be determined not by code, but by political will.
The tokenomics $WAL looks attractive only on paper. In March 2026, the first major token unlock will occur for early investors who bought them for pennies. A massive selling pressure could crash the price $WAL , making the reward for node operators negligible. Without financial incentive, nodes will start disconnecting, and the advertised "cheap storage" will turn into a risk of irreversible data loss.