SanSam Crypto
Frequent Trader
2.6 Years
Full Time Trader | 📊 Cryptocurrency analyst | Long & Short setup💪🏻
87 Following
2.5K+ Followers
1.7K+ Liked
17 Shared
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
See original
What's Cool About Walrus, 7 Key Differences That Define Its Identity
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus
What's cool about Walrus? I see Walrus as a project that puts user experience and value flow first, then comes the token story and communication. If I had to summarize the seven key differences that define its identity, I'd start with how Walrus turns complexity into ease of use, and transforms participation motivation into a purposeful feedback loop.
Point one is Walrus prioritizing practicality. Users don't need to understand every technical layer to get started; they just need a simple action and clear results. When something feels useful right away, it's easier to build habits. Do you agree that new habits are the greatest asset of an ecosystem?
What's cool about Walrus? I see Walrus as a project that puts user experience and value flow first, then comes the token story and communication. If I had to summarize the seven key differences that define its identity, I'd start with how Walrus turns complexity into ease of use, and transforms participation motivation into a purposeful feedback loop.
Point one is Walrus prioritizing practicality. Users don't need to understand every technical layer to get started; they just need a simple action and clear results. When something feels useful right away, it's easier to build habits. Do you agree that new habits are the greatest asset of an ecosystem?
See original
Walrus Token, Unlock Schedule, and How Selling Pressure Impacts the Market
$WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc #walrus
Walrus Token and the unlock schedule are always the first thing I look at before discussing potential, as they answer a very practical question: when will new supply enter the market, and who has the right to sell? Many projects have good products but weak prices, simply because the unlock schedule creates continuous supply waves, preventing buyers from absorbing the supply.
The unlock schedule is usually divided into groups such as team, early investors, ecosystem fund, community rewards, liquidity, and partners. Each group has different motivations, so their selling behavior varies. Early investors tend to take profits on a cycle, the team usually sells less if they believe in the long-term vision, while community rewards can create consistent small selling pressure. I often wonder which group has the largest share in each unlock event, and whether that group has a history of strong selling or holding long-term.
Walrus Token and the unlock schedule are always the first thing I look at before discussing potential, as they answer a very practical question: when will new supply enter the market, and who has the right to sell? Many projects have good products but weak prices, simply because the unlock schedule creates continuous supply waves, preventing buyers from absorbing the supply.
The unlock schedule is usually divided into groups such as team, early investors, ecosystem fund, community rewards, liquidity, and partners. Each group has different motivations, so their selling behavior varies. Early investors tend to take profits on a cycle, the team usually sells less if they believe in the long-term vision, while community rewards can create consistent small selling pressure. I often wonder which group has the largest share in each unlock event, and whether that group has a history of strong selling or holding long-term.
See original
Walrus Tokenomics, Fees, Incentives, and How Money Flows Through the Ecosystem
$WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc #walrus
Walrus Tokenomics is not just about supply and price charts, but about how the ecosystem generates real demand, collects fees, distributes rewards, and retains money flow long enough for sustainable growth. When I look at a tokenomics, I always ask one question: who pays, and why must they pay?
The fee portion is where the money flow begins. Users pay fees when they perform actions that create value, such as using core services, accessing resources, or activating advanced features. If fees are too low, the system lacks revenue to sustain security and development. If fees are too high, users leave before forming habits. The question is: does Walrus choose fees to maximize revenue, or to maximize user numbers, and where is the balance point?
Walrus Tokenomics is not just about supply and price charts, but about how the ecosystem generates real demand, collects fees, distributes rewards, and retains money flow long enough for sustainable growth. When I look at a tokenomics, I always ask one question: who pays, and why must they pay?
The fee portion is where the money flow begins. Users pay fees when they perform actions that create value, such as using core services, accessing resources, or activating advanced features. If fees are too low, the system lacks revenue to sustain security and development. If fees are too high, users leave before forming habits. The question is: does Walrus choose fees to maximize revenue, or to maximize user numbers, and where is the balance point?
See original
Private Blockchain for Enterprises, Why Dusk Is Different from the Rest?
$DUSK @Dusk #dusk
When I compare Dusk to other private blockchains, I don't start with the question of who is more private, I start with the question of who can turn privacy into a usable financial product.
Many private blockchains follow the path of absolute privacy for every transaction, focusing on hiding the sender, receiver, amount, and making tracing extremely difficult. This approach is strong for personal needs and creates a sense of freedom. But when entering organizational finance, what's needed is not just that no one sees it, but that only the right people see it, and when necessary, proof can be provided without exposing the entire dataset.
When I compare Dusk to other private blockchains, I don't start with the question of who is more private, I start with the question of who can turn privacy into a usable financial product.
Many private blockchains follow the path of absolute privacy for every transaction, focusing on hiding the sender, receiver, amount, and making tracing extremely difficult. This approach is strong for personal needs and creates a sense of freedom. But when entering organizational finance, what's needed is not just that no one sees it, but that only the right people see it, and when necessary, proof can be provided without exposing the entire dataset.
See original
Dusk and the Future of AI with Sensitive Data: Healthcare, Banking, Digital Identity
$DUSK @Dusk #dusk
Dusk and the future of AI with sensitive data are opening a major story about how society can leverage artificial intelligence without sacrificing privacy. As AI enters healthcare, banking, and digital identity, data is no longer just numbers—it's medical histories, financial transactions, identity records, and traces that can shape a person's life.
In healthcare, AI needs data to detect cancer early, predict recurrence risks, and personalize treatment plans. But medical records are data types whose leakage could cause long-term harm, from discrimination to insurance abuse. I always find this paradoxical: we want models smart enough to save lives, yet fear that the very data saving lives might be misused. Would you allow a model to learn from your data if you knew no one could see the original data?
Dusk and the future of AI with sensitive data are opening a major story about how society can leverage artificial intelligence without sacrificing privacy. As AI enters healthcare, banking, and digital identity, data is no longer just numbers—it's medical histories, financial transactions, identity records, and traces that can shape a person's life.
In healthcare, AI needs data to detect cancer early, predict recurrence risks, and personalize treatment plans. But medical records are data types whose leakage could cause long-term harm, from discrimination to insurance abuse. I always find this paradoxical: we want models smart enough to save lives, yet fear that the very data saving lives might be misused. Would you allow a model to learn from your data if you knew no one could see the original data?
See original
Confidential Data Marketplace: Dusk creates data exchange infrastructure for AI
$DUSK @Dusk #dusk
Confidential Data Marketplace is emerging as a practical solution to the problem of insufficient high-quality data for AI, while security requirements become increasingly stringent. Dusk can play the role of a data exchange infrastructure, where data usage is controlled, and value is fairly distributed to data providers.
The core issue in the AI data market lies in trust. Buyers want data to be clean, accurate, and with clear origins. Sellers, on the other hand, fear exposure of original data, fear copying, and fear legal risks. Without a verification mechanism that maintains confidentiality, the market will only operate on a small scale. Have you ever seen a high-quality dataset that no one dared to share due to risks?
Confidential Data Marketplace is emerging as a practical solution to the problem of insufficient high-quality data for AI, while security requirements become increasingly stringent. Dusk can play the role of a data exchange infrastructure, where data usage is controlled, and value is fairly distributed to data providers.
The core issue in the AI data market lies in trust. Buyers want data to be clean, accurate, and with clear origins. Sellers, on the other hand, fear exposure of original data, fear copying, and fear legal risks. Without a verification mechanism that maintains confidentiality, the market will only operate on a small scale. Have you ever seen a high-quality dataset that no one dared to share due to risks?
See original
Walrus's solution to the problem of user trust lies not in grand promises, but in how the platform was designed from the very beginning. Walrus builds trust through transparency, safety, and a consistent user experience. Every design decision is aimed at giving users greater control, rather than creating additional barriers. When users understand and feel how the system protects them, trust forms naturally. Are you trusting a platform because of its marketing claims, or because of the experience it actually delivers?
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus
See original
Why Walrus considers user protection a top priority reflects the core value of this platform. In a digital environment full of risks, Walrus understands that trust can only exist when users feel safe. Therefore, security, control, and transparency are built into the design from the start, not added later. Walrus doesn't just protect data and assets, but also safeguards user experience and peace of mind. A truly sustainable platform should first serve whose interests — the system or the users?
$WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc #walrus
$WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc #walrus
See original
Designed for users, not complexity – The Walrus experience reflects a different approach in the tech world. Walrus doesn't chase adding confusing features, but focuses on removing barriers to make it easy for users to access and use. Security and safety are hidden behind a smooth, intuitive, and consistent experience. Users don't need to become experts to feel confident. When technology serves people, rather than the other way around, real value is created. Is the platform you're using simplifying things, or making everything more complicated?
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
See original
How Walrus builds trust through user-centered design, starting with simplifying the most complex aspects. Instead of requiring users to deeply understand the technology, Walrus designs clear, transparent, and controllable experiences. Each feature is designed to create a sense of security, helping users understand how their data and assets are protected. When users feel respected and empowered, trust forms naturally. Is the platform you're using truly designed for you, or just for the backend system?
#walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL
#walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL
See original
User safety from the very design – Walrus's approach reflects the philosophy of building products with people at the center. Instead of adding security as a patch after the fact, Walrus integrates safety right into the core architecture of the platform. Users are protected in their data, assets, and control from the very beginning of interaction. The experience remains simple, but security standards are never compromised. When security becomes a natural part of design, users can安心 focus on real value. Is your platform built this way?
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
See original
Why is Dusk redefining user protection on the blockchain? Because most current systems still prioritize technology or regulations over people. Dusk takes the opposite approach: building privacy, security, and compliance into the foundation from the start, rather than patching them later. Users no longer have to sacrifice personal data to join the network, nor be left behind by legal requirements. When blockchain truly matures, protecting users will no longer be an option, but a mandatory standard. Has the blockchain you're using done this yet?
#dusk @Dusk $DUSK
#dusk @Dusk $DUSK
See original
Designed for users: Simple, private, and user-controlled on Dusk is the core philosophy behind how Dusk builds its blockchain. Instead of making the system more complex, Dusk focuses on optimizing the experience to make it easy to access and use while still ensuring high security. Privacy is not forced upon users—it's in their hands. They decide what to share and when. When technology becomes clean and transparent, real control returns to where it belongs. Are you using a blockchain that serves you, or are you forced to adapt to it?
$DUSK @Dusk #dusk
$DUSK @Dusk #dusk
See original
Dusk: When protecting users encounters legal realities, it's a challenge most blockchains avoid. While many platforms force users to sacrifice privacy to meet regulations, Dusk chooses a harder path. The network is designed to protect personal data while still enabling proof of legality when necessary. Instead of confronting the law, Dusk integrates compliance right into its system architecture. Can blockchain both protect users and sustainably exist in the real world? Or is this precisely the new standard the industry must strive for?
$DUSK #dusk @Dusk
$DUSK #dusk @Dusk
See original
Dusk: Where users feel safe is not just a slogan, but the core philosophy behind how this network is built. In a blockchain environment full of risks and chaos, Dusk prioritizes security, privacy, and transparency. Users can control their own data without having to sacrifice compliance or trust. When technology is strong enough, a sense of safety becomes natural. Are you using a blockchain that makes you anxious, or a platform that offers long-term peace of mind?
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
See original
How does Dusk protect user privacy while still complying with regulations—a question many blockchains have not fully answered. Dusk Network addresses this issue by combining advanced security technologies with flexible compliance mechanisms. Users can keep their transaction data confidential, while organizations retain the ability to prove legality when necessary. Instead of sacrificing privacy for compliance, Dusk builds a system where both can coexist. Do you really need to trade privacy for safety? Or is it time for blockchain to respect users more?
$DUSK #dusk @Dusk
$DUSK #dusk @Dusk
See original
🔥BlackRock continues to inject funds onto the exchange
Today they injected 3,743 $BTC ($339.45M) and 7,204 $ETH ($22.42M) onto the exchange
In the last 3 sessions they offloaded 800M Bitcoin + ETH
Today they injected 3,743 $BTC ($339.45M) and 7,204 $ETH ($22.42M) onto the exchange
In the last 3 sessions they offloaded 800M Bitcoin + ETH
See original
📊 Summary of CoinShares' weekly crypto fund flows report:
🔽 Total flows: -454 million USD → The market recorded a strong outflow as expectations for a March Fed rate cut dimmed following new macroeconomic data. In just four days, total outflows reached -1.3 billion USD, nearly erasing the +1.5 billion USD inflow seen in early January → indicating a very rapid shift in investor sentiment.
🔴 Bitcoin: -405 million USD → the asset with the strongest weekly withdrawal
🔴 Short Bitcoin: -9.2 million USD
🔴 Ethereum: -116 million USD → continues to face withdrawal pressure
🔴 Multi-asset: -21 million USD
🔴 Binance products: -3.7 million USD
🔴 Aave products: -1.7 million USD
💵 Altcoins attracted capital:
🟢 XRP: +45.8 million USD
🟢 Solana: +32.8 million USD
🟢 SUI: +7.6 million USD
✨ Conclusion: Institutional capital is pulling out of the U.S. market due to concerns that monetary policy will not ease soon. $BTC and $ETH continue to see net selling, while $SOL , $XRP và $SUI remain逆势, indicating capital shifting toward select altcoins rather than exiting the market entirely.
Overall sentiment remains defensive – cautious – risk-averse, with no return to a risk-on mindset yet.
🔽 Total flows: -454 million USD → The market recorded a strong outflow as expectations for a March Fed rate cut dimmed following new macroeconomic data. In just four days, total outflows reached -1.3 billion USD, nearly erasing the +1.5 billion USD inflow seen in early January → indicating a very rapid shift in investor sentiment.
🔴 Bitcoin: -405 million USD → the asset with the strongest weekly withdrawal
🔴 Short Bitcoin: -9.2 million USD
🔴 Ethereum: -116 million USD → continues to face withdrawal pressure
🔴 Multi-asset: -21 million USD
🔴 Binance products: -3.7 million USD
🔴 Aave products: -1.7 million USD
💵 Altcoins attracted capital:
🟢 XRP: +45.8 million USD
🟢 Solana: +32.8 million USD
🟢 SUI: +7.6 million USD
✨ Conclusion: Institutional capital is pulling out of the U.S. market due to concerns that monetary policy will not ease soon. $BTC and $ETH continue to see net selling, while $SOL , $XRP và $SUI remain逆势, indicating capital shifting toward select altcoins rather than exiting the market entirely.
Overall sentiment remains defensive – cautious – risk-averse, with no return to a risk-on mindset yet.
See original
🔥 Michael Saylor continues to buy $1.25B $BTC
The average price this time is $91,519
-> increasing total $BTC held to 687,410
$ETH
The average price this time is $91,519
-> increasing total $BTC held to 687,410
$ETH
See original
🔥 Bitcoin liquidation chart is showing a clear discrepancy
$BTC is still fluctuating within the range of 86kxxx-95k and has not yet broken through.
👉 If Bitcoin drops to the 86K5 range, approximately $6.9B will be liquidated
👉 If Bitcoin breaks above 95k5, approximately $3.8B will be liquidated
The liquidation amount is nearly double if the market kills long positions. According to fellow traders, will we follow what we're seeing or go against it? 👀
$ETH
$BTC is still fluctuating within the range of 86kxxx-95k and has not yet broken through.
👉 If Bitcoin drops to the 86K5 range, approximately $6.9B will be liquidated
👉 If Bitcoin breaks above 95k5, approximately $3.8B will be liquidated
The liquidation amount is nearly double if the market kills long positions. According to fellow traders, will we follow what we're seeing or go against it? 👀
$ETH
Login to explore more contents