2⃣ 早在九月,Finn 就已经开始谈论 @LoganPaul 的 Pokémon 了。他清楚地写道,这个 #Pikachu 让他感兴趣,并询问它在哪里可以买到。之后,他关注了 Logan。在那个帖子中,Finn 使用了 #GTA 动画:“Ah, shit, here we go again…” ——暗示他之前已经买过 #WIF 帽子,现在又要出发去买东西了。
3⃣ 昨天 Finn 写道,他现在正在研究如何购买这个皮卡丘。这意味着 Finn 不是在决定是否购买它——他已经知道自己有资源。唯一的问题是如何做。
4⃣ 然后事情变得更加有趣了。@finnbags 写道,到2026年他们将会有许多收购。此外,昨天他写道:“bags art gallery would go hard tbh。” 这是一个非常有力的声明。Finn和团队很可能已经开始构建类似“Bags app数字博物馆”之类的东西,在那里@BagsApp 的价值由一个极其昂贵的画廊支撑。如果是这样,这可能是一种全新的方法来启动平台并为项目创造价值。不管怎样,他们显然有一个计划——@Sambags12 也写到了这一点。
Been fighting a cold, 38.9C a couple of hours ago. First time getting sick after prison. This issue kept its airspace in my head for the last few days, even through the fever. Our industry should be able to completely eradicate this type of poison attacks, and protect our users.
All wallets should simply check if a receiving address is a “poison address”, and block the user. This is a blockchain query. Further, security alliances in the industry should maintain a real-time blacklist of these addresses, so that wallets can check before sending a transaction. Binance Wallet already does this. A user would get a warning like below if they try to send to a poison address.
Lastly, wallets should not even display these spam transactions anywhere. If the value of the tx is small, just filter it out. Protect users.