还有Sei -互动必回版-

哥们儿，@Vanarchain 这消费链上真的一点都没崩啊，结果这反而成了最大的考验，笑死。
Virtua那边循环跑了三周，零bug零惊喜零高光时刻，进场、claim、交易顺序永远一模一样，最终性稳得像肌肉记忆，库存推进就跟定时闹钟似的，没戏没泪没用户怀疑。社区聊天也安静得离谱，太安静了。
刚上线那会儿多嗨啊，用户盯着每一步，截图狂发，啥小事都庆祝，hype盖住所有小毛病。到了第三周，新鲜感没了，大家不care啥“完美运行”了，只剩“就这？”不是生气，就是单纯无聊。
这才是真·采用压力：不是出bug，是出“无聊”。 #Vanar 设计得太狠了，持久session、重叠状态、无中断进度，mint完就完事儿，费用稳，品牌层安静到没存在感，没重试没模糊失败没卡顿。
然后用户开始挑刺：第100次交互跟第99次比，时间差0.1秒、slot顺序微调、过渡节奏稍变，他们就感觉不对劲了。day1的小延迟大家原谅，day21就成“系统在搞我？”。没hype分散注意力，大家眼睛雪亮，盯着一致性，一点漂移都不放过。
$VANRY 就是为这长期“天天用它”的阶段生的，确定性状态、持久库存、可预测执行，扛得住聚光灯熄灭后的日子。但人不会永远感动，engagement不崩，就是平了：来、claim、走，没欢呼没W，就例行公事。
这死一般的单调才是Vanar真考场：第300次交互还能跟第3次一样靠谱吗？干净无聊的执行，在没人鼓掌的时候还能继续干净无聊吗？
无聊不吼，它就静静看着：用户走得快不快、聊得少不少、还夸不夸稳定。规模一大，“啥事都没出”不是胜利，是及格线。要是这儿稍稍滑坡，不是技术翻车，是给用户“果然该无聊”的许可——证明他们早该期待更多。
Vanar这是在赌：能不能让“无聊但可靠”变成新常态，而不是被无聊干掉。🚀🚀🚀
-------------------------------------------------------
Dude, @Vanarchain, the consumer chain hasn't crashed at all, which has become the biggest test. Hilarious.
Vantua has been running in a loop for three weeks, zero bugs, zero surprises, zero highlights. Entry, claims, and transaction sequences are always exactly the same; the finality is as stable as muscle memory. Inventory progression is like a ticking timer—no drama, no tears, no user doubts. The community chat is also ridiculously quiet, too quiet.
When it first launched, it was so exciting! Users were watching every step, sending screenshots like crazy, celebrating every little thing, hype covering up all minor issues. By the third week, the novelty wore off. People didn't care about "perfect operation" anymore; all that was left was "Is that all?" It wasn't anger, just pure boredom.
This is true adoption pressure: not bugs, but "boredom." #Vanar's design is too ruthless: persistent sessions, overlapping states, uninterrupted progress, mint and it's over, fees are stable, the brand layer is so quiet it's practically invisible, no retries, no ambiguous failures, no lag.
Then users start nitpicking: a 0.1-second time difference between the 100th and 99th interactions, a slight adjustment in slot order, a minor change in transition rhythm—and they feel something's wrong. The small delays on day 1 are forgiven, but on day 21, it becomes "Is the system messing with me?" Without hype to distract, everyone's eyes are sharp, watching for consistency, not letting a single drift go unnoticed.
It was designed for this long-term "daily use" phase: deterministic state, persistent inventory, predictable execution—able to withstand the days after the spotlight fades. But people aren't always moved; if engagement doesn't collapse, it's flat: come, claim, go—no cheers, no Ws, just routine.
This deathly monotony is Vanar's true test: can the 300th interaction be as reliable as the 3rd? Can clean, boring execution remain clean and boring when no one applauds?
Boring doesn't roar; it just quietly observes: how fast users leave, how little they talk, whether they still praise stability. At a large scale, "nothing went wrong" isn't a victory, it's just a passing grade. If things slip even slightly here, it's not a technical blunder, it's giving users permission to be "expectedly bored"—proving they should have expected more.
Vanar is betting: can they make "boring but reliable" the new normal, instead of being killed by boredom?

我半夜没事干，就随便在 @Fogo Official 上试了个小转账，不是追热炒也不是想暴富，就想看看这玩意儿到底顺不顺手，普通人用Web3到底能不能不烦死。结果把我卡住的不是速度慢也不是啥空头承诺，而是Fogo Sessions这东西太懂人了，直接把链子底层搞成用户友好模式，牛逼到爆。

新手为啥跑路？不是不信crypto，是真被烦死了：gas费老跳、得自己攒特定币、签名点到手酸、小破事变大麻烦。Fogo Sessions直接气死这些：gasless啊！内置paymaster帮你扛费，不用自己猜gas limit、不用持啥特定token，签个intent消息就完事儿，用任何Solana钱包都行，不逼你换新工具。链子终于知道：人不想适应你，你得适应人啊！
更绝的是保护机制内置：domain验证防钓鱼、per-token限额防手滑、session有时效到期自动断，防你一时冲动或被骗签大包。Web3亏钱大多就一签的事儿，它直接帮你设栏杆，现实里谁不偶尔脑抽啊？这小细节救命。
还特意把用户日常和燃料层分开，用SPL token不搞native $FOGO ，免得新手一看费机制就懵。优雅又不虐狗。
技术底子也硬：SVM兼容、Solana程序零改扔上去、块时间40ms以下，高负载也稳。签名少、步骤少，延迟一丁点都明显，Fogo真能在压力下保持丝滑。
总之不是靠吹牛，是真能用：gasless、intent签、paymaster自动、domain验、限额、到期断、统一界面，这些不是营销，是你摸得到的产品。市场天天炒作，#Fogo 就老老实实做个不坑用户的Web3，累了困了迷糊了还能顺手完成小事，这才是真尊重人。😅
-------------------------------------------------------
I was bored late at night, so I casually tried a small transfer on Fogo. I wasn't chasing trends or hoping to get rich quick; I just wanted to see how user-friendly it was, and whether Web3 could be truly convenient for the average person. What really got me stuck wasn't the slow speed or empty promises, but rather how incredibly user-friendly Fogo Sessions is. It's designed with a user-friendly blockchain architecture at its core—it's amazing!
Why do newbies quit? It's not that they don't believe in crypto, it's that they're genuinely fed up: constantly fluctuating gas fees, having to accumulate specific tokens, endless signature signing, and small things turning into big hassles. Fogo Sessions solves this problem: gas-free! The built-in paymaster handles the fees for you; you don't need to guess gas limits or hold specific tokens. Just sign an intent message, and you're done. It works with any Solana wallet; it doesn't force you to switch to a new tool. The blockchain has finally learned: if people don't want to adapt to you, you have to adapt to them!
What's even more impressive is the built-in protection mechanism: domain verification to prevent phishing, per-token limits to prevent accidental signing, and automatic session termination upon expiration, preventing impulsive signings or being tricked into signing large sums. Web3 losses often come down to a single signing, and this feature sets up barriers for you. Who doesn't occasionally make a mistake? This small detail is a lifesaver.
It also deliberately separates daily user interactions from the gas layer, using SPL tokens instead of the native FOGO, so beginners won't be confused by the fee structure. Elegant yet not overly restrictive.
The technical foundation is solid: SVM compatible, Solana program deployed with zero modifications, block time under 40ms, stable even under high load. Fewer signing steps, minimal latency—even the slightest delay is noticeable; Fogo truly maintains smooth performance under pressure.
In short, it's not just hype; it's genuinely usable: gasless, intent signing, automatic Paymaster, domain verification, limits, expiration termination, unified interface—these aren't marketing hype; they're tangible products. The market is constantly hyping things up, but Fogo should just honestly create a Web3 service that doesn't cheat users. When you're tired, sleepy, or confused, you can still easily get small tasks done. That's true respect for people.

现在我看Layer 1都不爱吹TPS、白皮书、炒作了，就一个问题：这玩意儿我敢不敢直接塞给完全没碰过钱包的普通人，还不怕他骂街跑路？

@Vanarchain 每次都过关，牛！
大部分链子是码农给自己玩的：一堆术语、钱包gas先学半年才能摸到乐子，adoption？后妈养的。Vanar反着来，先管游戏、娱乐、品牌、真用户爽不爽，链子自己躲后台当工具人。
这不是小修UX，是整套思路：VGN游戏生态压根不卖“Web3游戏”，就卖正常游戏！简单进、零摩擦、不逼你当小币商，玩家就玩儿就行。别人让你一边打游戏一边炒币，Vanar直接说“别闹，玩你的去”——这在圈里算革命了好吗。
还有Virtua这元宇宙，不是PPT货，是真拿来测链子的：直播市场、动态NFT、品牌联动，普通人一用就知道链子行不行。卡顿、mint失败、费用暴涨？直接劝退。Virtua稳稳跑着，说明Vanar不是纸上谈兵，是真扛得住日常人用。
Neutron AI层也低调狠：不是整花里胡哨的AI agent，而是把文件压缩成轻量、可验证的“Seeds”，意思还在、链上能查。游戏、品牌、数字身份、合规全能用，真价值不是空喊。
$VANRY 更不是moon币，它就是生态小发动机：gas、staking、验证、治理、跨ETH/Polygon啥的。供给透明、合约可查、链上活动实打实，不靠炒作活。
当然有取舍：DPoS+基金会节点，稳字当头，去中心化没拉满。但对品牌、创作者、普通人来说，稳>纯，靠谱比教条重要多了。
Vanar最戳的是它真在为“大规模上车”设计，不是嘴上说说。历史上最好的科技都隐身：刷剧谁懂TCP/IP，发朋友圈谁研究分布式？#Vanar 要是成了，也不是因为大家爱它共识，而是大家玩游戏、收东西、跟品牌玩得开心，根本没注意到后面有条链在跑。
圈里天天大故事大叙事，Vanar这股“让普通人用着舒服就行”的味儿，真的清流。😂😂
这不是又一条Layer 1，是给咱们这些非nerd的区块链。
--------------------------------------------------
Now, I see Layer 1 developers no longer hyping up TPS, white papers, or marketing. They just have one question: Would I dare hand this thing out to an average person with no experience with wallets, without worrying they'd complain and run away with the money?
Vanar always passes the test, impressive!
Most blockchains are just for programmers to play with: a bunch of jargon, wallet gas fees—you have to learn for six months before you can even get the hang of it. Adoption? Like an unwanted stepchild. Vanar does the opposite. It prioritizes games, entertainment, branding, and ensuring genuine user satisfaction, while the blockchain itself remains in the background as a tool.
This isn't just a minor UX tweak; it's the whole strategy: the VGN gaming ecosystem doesn't sell "Web3 games" at all, only normal games! Simple entry, zero friction, no pressure to become a small-time cryptocurrency trader—players can just play. While others try to make you trade cryptocurrencies while playing games, Vanar simply says, "Don't be silly, go do your own thing"—that's revolutionary in the industry.
Then there's Virtua, this metaverse isn't just a PowerPoint presentation; it's a genuine test of blockchain technology: live marketplaces, dynamic NFTs, brand collaborations—ordinary users can immediately tell if a blockchain is viable. Lag, mint failures, skyrocketing fees? Those are enough to deter anyone. Virtua runs steadily, proving Vanar isn't just theoretical; it's truly capable of handling everyday use.
Neurtron's AI layer is also understated yet powerful: it doesn't rely on fancy AI agents, but rather compresses files into lightweight, verifiable "Seeds"—the functionality remains, and they're traceable on-chain. It's usable for games, brands, digital identities, and compliance—its real value isn't just empty talk.
$VANRY isn't just a moon coin; it's the ecosystem's engine: gas, staking, verification, governance, cross-ETH/Polygon, etc. Supply is transparent, contracts are verifiable, and on-chain activities are real—it doesn't rely on hype.
Of course, there are trade-offs: DPoS + foundation nodes prioritize stability, but decentralization isn't fully realized. But for brands, creators, and ordinary people, stability is more important than purity; reliability is far more crucial than dogma.
What's most compelling about Vanar is that it's genuinely designed for mass adoption, not just talk. The best technologies in history have been largely hidden: who understands TCP/IP when watching TV shows, who studies distributed systems when posting on social media? If Vanar succeeds, it won't be because people love its consensus mechanism, but because everyone is having fun playing games, collecting items, and interacting with brands, completely unaware that a blockchain is running behind the scenes.
In a world full of grand stories and narratives, Vanar's focus on "making it comfortable for ordinary users" is truly refreshing.
This isn't just another Layer 1 blockchain; it's a blockchain for us non-nerds.

Jéje, Layer 1 se jeden po druhém objevují a říkají „přetváříme budoucnost crypto“ a „revoluce pro všechny“ a tak, obrovské a abstraktní, a co z toho? Když se dostaneme k on-chain transakcím, tak to selže: zpoždění, selhání transakcí, peněženka neustále kliká na schválení, jakmile dojde k volatilitě, tak to prostě spadne, tyto problémy si všichni „tolerují jako blockchainovou specialitu“. #Fogo Nechci se předvádět, řeknu to přímo, já se nezapojuju do velkých narativů, ale soustředím se na řešení těchto bolestných bodů vašich transakcí.

Nedělá žádné blbosti s novinkami, SVM je kompatibilní se Solanou, vývojáři mohou hned začít bez učení nových věcí, pragmatický přístup. Důraz na provádění: krátká doba bloků, stabilní propustnost, předvídatelné náklady, není to jen o chlubení během demo fáze, skutečná síť ukazuje, že je určena pro každodenní transakce, ne pro špičkovou show.

哎，哥们儿你去问问那些Web3项目凉凉的创始人，十个有九个会说“不是代码崩了啊！”智能合约跑得飞起，testnet稳如老狗，demo看起来超丝滑，结果呢？全是被那些没人提的“杂七杂八”给活活拖死的。审计一家就要仨月，预算直接砍一半还没用户呢；钱包对接又磨六周；再加合规审查、数据分析、营销、跟交易所聊半天没下文、社区工具一堆……一个小五人团队突然要同时管二十个供应商，钱包天天缩水，产品还没正式上线人就先累死了。大部分不是菜，是真没钱没时间没精力拼这个乱七八糟的“上线拼图”。

@Vanarchain 的Kickstart直接把这坨屎给打包解决了，超级低调但牛逼！不是那种申请grant等俩月看心情批不批的玩意儿，也不是黑客松拿个奖杯当摆设。它直接给你一整套流水线：审计、合规、钱包对接、分析工具、go-to-market全捆一起，合作伙伴优先通道+打折，团队一下就插进所有需要的东西，不用自己到处找人、砍价、赶不同时间表，省了超级多命。
crypto圈没人爱聊这个，因为太“无聊”了，大家都爱吹TPS、共识机制多炫，哪有人发推说“我把从代码到上线的周期砍了60%”啊？顶多别人嗯嗯两声。但这才是真杀手锏：五十个应用活下来 vs 五坨repo躺尸，区别就是天壤。创始人能多喘口气找到用户 vs 上线前就破产，Kickstart就是在干这个救命的事。
#Vanar 不追一个网红killer app，也不爱炒大牌合作，它赌的是“密度”——帮一大堆小团队活下去，总有三成能冒头，生态就厚实了。赌十个只盼一个独角兽？那叫赌博，不是建生态。慢工出细活，稳得一批，跟Web3那套“快建快死快迭代”完全反着来。
技术上也配得上：Neutron API直接在协议层给AI agent持久记忆，不用每次都失忆脑残；零gas基础层，用户不用付手续费，上手门槛直接没了；Kickstart再把运营层摩擦全抹平。技术+运营两头夹击，小团队才真有活路。
对 $VANRY 也好：应用多→Neutron API调用多→每次调用烧$VANRY（永久销毁，不是锁仓），供给越缩越紧。一百个小项目每天稳定用，比一个大app偶尔爆一下烧得狠多了，自循环：帮团队活→他们用链→烧币→币更值→更多团队来，完美。
别的L1扔grant撒钱盼中彩票，结果热闹两天就凉。Vanar不一样，它是真在帮创始人别死得太早，让他们专注建产品。低调、烦人、但超级实用。Web3不缺花里胡哨的协议，缺的就是这种解决真痛点的基建。Kickstart就是，市场现在睡着，早晚醒了会发现：活下来的链子，都是没让builder先破产的那个。🚀🚀🚀
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey buddy, go ask the founders of those failed Web3 projects. Nine out of ten will say, "It wasn't the code that crashed!" Smart contracts were running like crazy, the testnet was rock solid, the demo looked incredibly smooth, but what happened? They were all dragged down by those unmentioned "miscellaneous" issues. Auditing one project takes three months, the budget is halved, and there are still no users; wallet integration takes another six weeks; add compliance reviews, data analysis, marketing, endless talks with exchanges with no progress, a bunch of community tools... A small team of five suddenly has to manage twenty suppliers, the wallet is shrinking every day, and the team is exhausted before the product even officially launches. Most of them aren't incompetent; they genuinely don't have the money, time, or energy to piece together this messy "launch puzzle."
@Vanarchain's Kickstarter packaged this crap out of everything, super low-key but awesome! It's not one of those grant applications that you apply for and wait two months for approval, or a hackathon where you get a trophy just for show. It provides a complete workflow: auditing, compliance, wallet integration, analytics tools, and go-to-market all bundled together, with priority access and discounts for partners. Your team can immediately integrate everything they need, without having to search for people, haggle over prices, or rush different schedules – saving you a tremendous amount of time and effort.
Nobody in the crypto community likes to talk about this because it's too "boring." Everyone loves to brag about TPS and how cool consensus mechanisms are; who tweets, "I cut the time from code to launch by 60%?" At most, people might give a few hums. But this is the real killer app: fifty apps surviving vs. five dead repositories – the difference is enormous. It gives founders more breathing room to find users vs. going bankrupt before launch. Kickstarter does this life-saving thing.
#Vanar doesn't chase after viral killer apps or hype big-name collaborations; it bets on "density" – helping a bunch of small teams survive, with at least 30% emerging, creating a robust ecosystem. Are they betting on ten to hope for just one unicorn? That's gambling, not building an ecosystem. Slow and steady wins the race, a far cry from the "build fast, die fast, iterate fast" approach of Web3.
Technically, it's justified: the Neutron API provides persistent memory to the AI ​​agent at the protocol layer, preventing frequent memory loss and malfunctions; the zero-gas foundation eliminates user fees, lowering the barrier to entry; and Kickstarter smooths out operational friction. This combination of technical and operational pressures truly gives small teams a chance to survive.
It's also beneficial: more applications → more Neutron API calls → each call burns $VANRY (permanently destroyed, not locked), tightening the supply. A hundred small projects using it stably every day burn far more than a large app occasionally experiencing a crash, creating a self-sustaining cycle: helping teams survive → they use the chain → burning coins → the coin becomes more valuable → more teams join – perfect.
Other L1 blockchains throw out grants and cash hoping for a lottery win, only to fizzle out after a couple of days. Vanar is different; it genuinely helps founders avoid premature failure, allowing them to focus on product development. Low-key, annoying, but incredibly practical. Web3 isn't lacking in fancy protocols, but it lacks infrastructure that solves real pain points. Kickstarter is that. The market is asleep now, but it will wake up sooner or later to find that the surviving chains are the ones that didn't bankrupt the builder first. 🚀🚀🚀

哎，区块链这圈子老是这样啊，先一群码农搞个超去中心化、抗审查的链子，然后才想起来“欸，得拉交易员来玩啊”，结果交易员一上来就吐槽：延迟高得离谱、确认慢得像乌龟、$10 的小swap和$1000万的清算居然待遇一样？！然后交易员跑路，链子就赶紧转头搞NFT、游戏啥的续命。$FOGO 直接不玩这套，反向操作，牛逼！

团队不是纯码农，是从Citadel、JPMorgan、Morgan Stanley、Jump Crypto跳出来的老油条，那些地方一毫秒延迟都能亏几百万，他们懂交易的痛点。所以他们没先建个通用链再求金融圈来用，而是直接冲着机构级交易基础设施去的，专治各种不服。
技术上最狠的是只用Firedancer这个Jump搞的超猛验证客户端，别家链为了去中心化支持一堆客户端，结果性能被最慢的那个拖后腿。@Fogo Official 直接all in最快的，mainnet块时间40毫秒！Solana才400ms左右，十倍快，交易员做高频的时候这差距不是开玩笑的。
还有那个multi-local consensus，超绝了但很多人看不懂：验证节点按地理分区扎堆放（东京、纽约、伦敦啥的），同数据中心延迟基本0，共识速度飞起。交易忙的时候就这么本地狂飙，闲下来自动切全球模式防单点挂掉，还每epoch轮换区域不让哪个地方永久霸占。平衡速度和去中心化，别的L1根本玩不转。
测试网峰值13.6万TPS，主网1月15号直接上线，带了Ambient Finance搞永续、Pyth实时oracle、Wormhole跨40+链，十个应用ready to go，不用等空头支票。
对开发者超友好，全SVM兼容，Solana的app一行代码不改就能跑，Anchor、SPL啥的照旧，但延迟低到爆，做order book、清算引擎这些时间敏感的东西，架构直接升级，之前链上不可能的现在能搞了。
现在$FOGO才两美分左右，从1月高点6美分跌了67%，听着惨，但就是早期空投砸盘+波动正常。基础设施真跑起来了，应用活的，承诺的速度真给到。关键是流动性永远追最快的执行环境，历史证明了：更快的地方钱就跑过去。 #Fogo 这玩意儿就是给机构级on-chain交易建的赛道，团队懂行、性能碾压、生态起步了，现在估值低得像白捡，以后市场醒了估计得飞。
反正我觉得这不是炒作，是真在解决痛点。😅😅
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sigh, this is always the way things are in the blockchain world. First, a bunch of programmers create a super decentralized, censorship-resistant chain, then they think, "Hey, we need to get traders to use it!" But the traders immediately complain: the latency is ridiculously high, confirmations are as slow as a tortoise, and a $10 swap is treated the same as a $10 million clearing?! Then the traders run away, and the chain scrambles to survive by adding NFTs and games. This team doesn't play that game at all; they do the opposite—brilliant!
The team isn't just pure programmers; they're seasoned veterans from Citadel, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, and Jump Crypto. In those places, even a millisecond of latency can cost millions; they understand the pain points of trading. So instead of building a general-purpose chain and then begging the financial sector to use it, they're aiming directly for institutional-grade trading infrastructure, a sure way to silence any dissent.
Technically, the most impressive feature is the incredibly powerful validation client built using only the Fireracer Jump. Other chains, in their pursuit of decentralization, support a multitude of clients, only to have their performance hampered by the slowest one. FOGO goes all-in on the fastest, with a mainnet block time of 40 milliseconds! Solana is only around 400ms, ten times faster. For high-frequency traders, this difference is no joke.
Then there's the multi-local consensus mechanism, which is phenomenal but often misunderstood: validation nodes are clustered geographically (Tokyo, New York, London, etc.), resulting in near-zero latency within the same data center and blazing-fast consensus speeds. During busy trading periods, it operates at full speed locally, automatically switching to global mode to prevent single-point failures, and rotating regions every epoch to prevent any one location from permanently dominating. This balance between speed and decentralization is something other L1 chains simply can't achieve.
The testnet peaked at 136,000 TPS, and the mainnet launched directly on January 15th. It includes Ambient Finance for perpetual liquidity, Pyth for real-time oracle, Wormhole for cross-chain compatibility with 40+ chains, and ten applications ready to go—no need to wait for empty promises.
It's incredibly developer-friendly, fully SVM compatible. Solana apps can run without any code changes, and Anchor, SPL, etc., remain unchanged, but with incredibly low latency. For time-sensitive components like order books and liquidation engines, the architecture has been directly upgraded, making things impossible on-chain before possible.
Currently, $$FOGO s only around two cents, a 67% drop from its January high of six cents. It sounds terrible, but that's just early airdrop dumping and normal volatility. The infrastructure is truly up and running, applications are alive, and the promised speed is delivered. Crucially, liquidity always follows the fastest execution environment; history has proven that money flows to where it's fastest. essentially a platform built for institutional-grade on-chain transactions. The team is knowledgeable, the performance is superior, and the ecosystem is already taking off. Its current valuation is incredibly low, almost like a steal. Once the market recovers, it'll likely skyrocket.
Anyway, I don't think this is hype; it genuinely addresses a pain point.

V kryptoměnové sféře jsou přes den pouze skvělé PPT, adopce, hromadné onboardování, stavitelé a podobně, zní to velmi vzrušující, ale když přijde noční směna a musíme hlídat řetěz, teprve pak zjistíme, jak krutá je realita: jedna chyba v desetinné čárce, nesprávná cesta, čísla se nedrží pohromadě, cítíme sevření na hrudi - není to kvůli hodnotě kryptoměny, ale kvůli skutečným penězům, platu a závazkům, které na tom visí. Jakmile blockchain opustí zasedací místnost, musíme čelit tvrdé realitě provozu: není „mělo by být“, je pouze „je nebo není“.

Veřejné účetnictví vypadá skvěle, ale ve skutečnosti je to velmi hlučné, snadno nesprávně pochopené a může být použito jako zbraň. Skutečná odpovědnost není o tom, že všechny detaily hodíme na internet, aby se na ně všichni dívali, ale o tom, že můžeme prokázat, co je správné - ukázat to auditorům, regulátorům a partnerům, co je potřeba vidět, a nesdílet interní platy, nabídky dodavatelů a strategické plány. Soukromí není luxus, je to právní a morální minimum. Vystavovat všechny firemní záležitosti na internetu není otevřenost, ale sebevražda. Tajemství není skrývání, ale „kontrolované zveřejnění“ - ochrana uživatelů a podnikání, a také možnost kdykoliv ukázat to, co je potřeba vidět.