ALONE _ TRADER 18

Dezentralizované úložiště je v současnosti odvětvím o hodnotě 9 miliard dolarů v kryptoměně. Dvě třetiny této částky, tedy 6 miliard dolarů, jsou ve skutečnosti ovládány pouze třemi projekty – ICP, Filecoin a Arweave. Jedná se o extrémně důležité a rychle rostoucí odvětví, a když o tom přemýšlíte, pokud vaše data a vaše weby nejsou hostovány dezentralizovaným způsobem, jak moc dezentralizované jsou vaše aplikace?

Velmi pravděpodobně vůbec nez decentralizované a určitě nez decentralizované dostatečně. Dezentralizované úložiště je součástí jádra kryptoměny a teď je tu nová síla s unikátní technologií, která chce udělat svůj výrazný přínos. Pracujeme na další generaci dezentralizovaného úložiště s Walrus.

And that’s where most of them failed.
Non-fungible tokens promised something revolutionary: true digital ownership.
An asset that could live on-chain, be provably yours, and exist independently of any single platform or company.
But in practice, most NFTs quietly broke that promise.
When you mint a typical NFT today, the blockchain does not store the image, video, or media itself. It stores a pointer — usually a URL or IPFS hash — that tells your wallet where the content lives. The actual file is often hosted on a private or semi-centralized server.
This creates an uncomfortable reality.
If that server goes offline…
If the hosting company shuts down…
If a domain expires or a service changes terms…
The NFT doesn’t disappear — but the media does.
What remains is a token pointing to nothing. A broken image. A receipt without the asset.
Ownership becomes symbolic instead of real.
The Core Problem: NFTs Inherited Web2’s Weaknesses
Blockchains are excellent at recording who owns what.
They are terrible at storing large files.
So the NFT ecosystem took a shortcut:
Store ownership on-chain
Store media off-chain
Hope the storage layer survives forever
Hope is not a durability strategy.
Centralized or weakly decentralized storage introduces the same risks Web3 was supposed to eliminate:
Single points of failure
Censorship
Silent data loss
Long-term decay
Over time, many NFTs will not be lost through hacks or rug pulls — they will simply fade into broken links.
Enter Walrus 🦭: Making NFT Media Durable by Design
Walrus approaches the problem from a different angle.
Instead of asking “Where should we host NFT media?”
Walrus asks “How do we make digital data impossible to disappear?”
When NFT media is stored on Walrus, it is not uploaded to a single server or owned by one provider.
It is:
Split into pieces
Cryptographically secured
Distributed across a global network of independent nodes
No single node holds the full file.
No single operator can delete it.
No single failure can erase it.
As long as the network exists, the data exists.
This transforms NFTs from references into durable digital objects.
Why This Changes What “Ownership” Actually Means
True ownership requires more than a token ID and a wallet address.
It requires:
Persistence
Availability
Independence from trusted intermediaries
By anchoring NFT media directly into a decentralized storage network, Walrus keeps the token and the asset inseparable.
You don’t just own a pointer.
You own something that continues to exist — regardless of companies, servers, or platforms.
That’s the difference between:
“I own a link”
and “I own a digital artifact”
The Long Game: Cultural and Legal Implications
This matters beyond collectibles.
NFTs are increasingly used for:
Digital art archives
Intellectual property records
Gaming assets
Certificates and credentials
Forensic and historical data
If these assets rely on fragile storage, their value decays over time.
Walrus introduces a foundation where:
Cultural artifacts don’t vanish
Legal references remain verifiable
Digital history can be reconstructed years later
This is infrastructure thinking — not hype.
NFTs Weren’t Broken — Their Storage Was
The idea of NFTs was never the problem.
The problem was that permanence was assumed instead of engineered.
By making data durability a first-class property, Walrus restores the original promise of NFTs:
Digital ownership that survives platforms, companies, and time.
Not just a token.
Not just a link.
A real, persistent digital asset.
$WAL 🦭 #walrus @WalrusProtocol

In 2025, the decentralized storage network Walrus transitioned from a system focused purely on "keeping data alive" to one that proactively enforces "who can see it." This shift wasn't a policy change—it was a series of technical and economic milestones that transformed Walrus into a foundational layer of the Sui Stack.
Here is the detailed chronology of how Walrus began enforcing access control and reliability without asking for permission.
1. The Foundation: Mainnet Launch (March 27, 2025)
Walrus officially went live on its production mainnet in late March 2025. This established the "baseline" of trust through a decentralized network of 100+ independent storage nodes.
* Availability by Architecture: Unlike centralized clouds that rely on a single company’s uptime, Walrus launched with RedStuff, a 2D erasure-coding system. It claims that even if up to two-thirds of storage nodes go offline, user data remains fully reconstructible.
* The WAL Token: WAL was introduced not just for payment, but as a "security budget." With a max supply of 5 billion tokens, it powers delegated staking, meaning the community—not a central board—decides which nodes are trustworthy enough to hold data.
2. The Institutional Shift: Grayscale Trust (August 2025)
By mid-2025, Walrus had become legible to institutional capital. On August 12, 2025, Grayscale officially launched the Grayscale Walrus Trust.
* Why it matters: This moved Walrus out of the "experimental" bucket and into rooms where "trust me" isn't an option. By allowing accredited investors to gain exposure to WAL via a traditional vehicle, the protocol solidified its status as a "foundational data infrastructure."
3. The "Access" Upgrade: Seal (September 3, 2025)
This is the specific moment Walrus began enforcing "Who can see this." Before Seal, decentralized storage was largely public. Seal introduced onchain access control and threshold encryption.
* Programmable Privacy: Instead of a company gatekeeper, developers now use Seal to define rules on the Sui blockchain. For example, a file can be "sealed" so that only users holding a specific NFT or meeting a certain compliance check can decrypt it.
* Threshold Committee: Decryption keys are split among a committee of key servers. No single server can see the data; it requires a "threshold" of servers to cooperate based on the onchain policy. This removes the "single point of betrayal" common in Web2.
4. Hardening the Network: 2025 Year in Review (December 2025)
As the year closed, Walrus published a review highlighting that the network was now handling real operational workflows—including EV data (DLP Labs), AI datasets (TensorBlock), and medical data.
* Deflationary Pressure: The network began enforcing a "burn" mechanic where WAL is burned with every transaction, tying the token's value directly to the network's utility.
* Efficiency Gains: The "Quilt" upgrade (September 2025) improved the efficiency of small files (under 1MB), saving ecosystem partners over 3 million WAL in storage costs.
Summary of the 2025 "Walrus Arc"
| Date | Milestone | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|
| March 2025 | Mainnet Launch | "Can I keep it available?" (Yes, via 100+ nodes). |
| August 2025 | Grayscale Trust | "Is it safe for institutions?" (Yes, via traditional rails). |
| Sept 2025 | Seal Launch | "Who can see this?" (Policy enforced onchain). |
| Dec 2025 | Quilt Upgrade | "Is it affordable?" (3M+ WAL saved in efficiency). |
The Philosophy: Privacy as a Safety Requirement
The arrival of Seal in late 2025 marked the maturity of the platform. Walrus essentially admitted that for a storage layer to be "real," it cannot be "public by default." By moving access control onto the blockchain, Walrus ensured that privacy is not a preference—it is an enforced protocol rule.
#walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL

The Current State of Walrus (January 2026)
To ground your insights in the current reality of the network as of today, January 11, 2026, here are the operational and market vitals:
Market Snapshot: WAL is currently trading at approximately $0.141, with a market capitalization of roughly $223M. The circulating supply sits at 1.58B WAL, out of a total maximum supply of 5B.
Proven Resilience: The network has moved beyond its March 27, 2025, mainnet launch and is now proving itself through sheer volume. The numbers you cited from Tusky—managing over 45 million files and processing millions of uploads monthly—show that the "boring" administrative utility you highlighted is actually happening at scale.
Infrastructure Maturity: Following the $140M funding round led by Standard Crypto, the focus has shifted from bootstrapping supply to ensuring the "public cost and public record" of storage remains stable.
Why the "Disappearance as Default" Assumption Matters
The most insightful part of your piece is the focus on "boredom" and "administrative failure" rather than cinematic hacks. In the real world, data usually dies because a credit card expires or a company pivots. Walrus fights this by:
RedStuff Encoding: Breaking data into shards so that even if a significant portion of storage nodes "drift away," the file remains recoverable.
Verifiable Proofs: The periodic on-chain availability certificates ensure that operators aren't just claiming to have data—they are proving it to the network to keep their stake.
Predictable Economics: Using WAL to decouple storage costs from the high volatility of the broader crypto market, ensuring that "keeping the lights on" for a file is a predictable expense.
Walrus isn't just about storing bytes; it’s about eliminating the hand-waving in decentralized applications. When the chain says an asset exists, Walrus ensures the asset actually exists.
#walrus $WAL @WalrusProtocol