BoBaTV

It may be just a misinterpretation or an occasional coincidence, but have you noticed that cryptocurrencies experience significant increases during periods of war? Could this "strange" coincidence be related to an "alleged payment" for weapons?
How to finance a war/conflict without leaving traces of involvement?
The "New START" (New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) was signed in 2010 in Prague by the presidents of the United States (Barack Obama) and Russia (Dmitry Medvedev). The "New START" limited the number of "Nuclear Warheads" between the US and Russia to 1,550 for each side.
In fact, the Treaty is no longer in effect since the "Covid-19 Pandemic", which interrupted inspections in both sides.
The Treaty conveyed a sense of "Pacification" and tranquility to the world, although the development of new missiles (capable of carrying numerous warheads) has advanced significantly.
Today, we live in the paradigm: "If you increase your Security, you also increase my Insecurity."
Another important factor emerged during this decade: China is developing and increasingly expanding its arsenal of "Nuclear Warheads".
Trump favors a new "New START" agreement as long as other countries are also participants, but China opposes this.
When questioned by Trump about China's military power, Putin replies: "That's your problem!" refraining from censuring the "Ally" (China).
But what about Israel, Pakistan, India, France, Great Britain, and North Korea? (which also possess Nuclear Weapons)
It's difficult to consider a consensus solution!
It might just be a misinterpretation or a chance coincidence, but why do cryptocurrencies show significant increases during periods of war?
Could this "strange" coincidence be related to an alleged payment for the development of weapons?
How to finance a war/conflict without leaving traces of involvement? What kind of financial transaction could hide traces?
Perhaps cryptocurrencies could play an important role in this episode, where the instability of the crypto market may play a supporting role and recklessness (and the slightest slip-up) amidst tension capable of leading to World War III, are the true protagonists.
Do the AIs that analyze our crypto market (TradeyAI) consider these hypotheses?

The conversion of dollars into gold was suspended to contain the loss in EUA reserves.
Thus, (since the post-World War II period) governments have had the autonomy to issue money without the physical constraint of gold, which leads to inflation and public debt.
This was the end of the "Bretton Woods" system (1944) and gave rise to the fiat currency system.
Since then, the value of fiat currencies has been based on trust in governments and central banks, and no longer on a physical commodity (gold).
Russia and China have intensified their investments in gold, in an attempt to reduce dependence on foreign currencies and internationalize their currency (Yuan). Some BRICS countries are encouraging a pilot project for a gold-backed settlement unit within the bloc.
Brazil increased its gold reserves, reaching 161.13 tons (2025), but the largest investor in 2025 was Poland.
However, the scenario of high-volume purchases presents risks of market saturation, characterized by excessive valuation and vulnerability to corrections.
Gold-backed stablecoins (as $PAXG and Tether Gold) may become the "Sleeping Giant" and, due to the recent drop in cryptocurrency valuations, are being considered the "New Safe Haven" that can be included in our portfolios (Wallets) as an expansion in our "Diversification" list.
TradeIAs warn of possible volatility caused by the high acquisition of giant buyers, which would make the market susceptible to a "Liquidation".
That is, if the price falls, the forced sale by these large holders could accelerate a drop.