Binance Square

Htp96

Open Trade
BNB Holder
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
7.7 Years
We are the Vietnamese non-profit crypto community that helps Vietnamese people X (Twitter) : @htp96_community
93 Following
23.1K+ Followers
11.9K+ Liked
1.0K+ Shared
All Content
Portfolio
PINNED
--
See original
Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissionsCurrently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done. READ NOW Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve. Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.

Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissions

Currently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done.
READ NOW

Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
--
Bullish
See original
Many Bull Run 2026 scenarios emerge, investors remain cautious In January, the market began to inch upward, not noisy but enough to create a familiar feeling. Everyone sensed something 'off'—something they had seen before. In February, BTC rebounded more noticeably, confidence slowly returned, the timeline became less gloomy, and people started talking about the market more instead of staying silent. In March, altcoins surged, FOMO spread rapidly, and the question 'How high will it go?' appeared frequently. By April, there was a mild bull trap; many believed this was just a necessary correction before continuing upward, so they held their positions tightly, even adding more. In May, there was a sell-off, emotions began to overpower logic. By June, bears showed their faces, the market cooled significantly, liquidity dwindled, leaving only those with enough patience to stay. Personally, I find this scenario quite unlikely. What do you guys think the market will do?? #BTC
Many Bull Run 2026 scenarios emerge, investors remain cautious

In January, the market began to inch upward, not noisy but enough to create a familiar feeling. Everyone sensed something 'off'—something they had seen before.

In February, BTC rebounded more noticeably, confidence slowly returned, the timeline became less gloomy, and people started talking about the market more instead of staying silent.

In March, altcoins surged, FOMO spread rapidly, and the question 'How high will it go?' appeared frequently.

By April, there was a mild bull trap; many believed this was just a necessary correction before continuing upward, so they held their positions tightly, even adding more.

In May, there was a sell-off, emotions began to overpower logic. By June, bears showed their faces, the market cooled significantly, liquidity dwindled, leaving only those with enough patience to stay. Personally, I find this scenario quite unlikely.

What do you guys think the market will do??
#BTC
See original
ALTCOINS ARE LEADING TOTAL MARKET TRADING VOLUMEIn the current landscape of the cryptocurrency market, altcoins are gradually taking center stage in terms of liquidity. Specifically, altcoins currently account for approximately 50% of the total trading volume across the entire market, surpassing Bitcoin at 27% and Ethereum at 23%. This is a notable shift compared to previous cycles, when $BTC and $ETH usually dominated. The rise in altcoin trading volume clearly reflects a return of risk appetite among investors.

ALTCOINS ARE LEADING TOTAL MARKET TRADING VOLUME

In the current landscape of the cryptocurrency market, altcoins are gradually taking center stage in terms of liquidity.
Specifically, altcoins currently account for approximately 50% of the total trading volume across the entire market, surpassing Bitcoin at 27% and Ethereum at 23%. This is a notable shift compared to previous cycles, when $BTC and $ETH usually dominated.
The rise in altcoin trading volume clearly reflects a return of risk appetite among investors.
See original
Bitcoin in Q1: Expectation or Caution?$BTC generally performed quite well in Q1. The last time Q1 was truly poor was in 2018, when prices dropped nearly in half within the first three months of the year. In recent years, the situation has been completely different. Q1 is usually a relatively positive period, or at least stable. Even in 2022, the beginning of a prolonged bear cycle – the market in Q1 was mostly flat rather than crashing heavily.

Bitcoin in Q1: Expectation or Caution?

$BTC generally performed quite well in Q1. The last time Q1 was truly poor was in 2018, when prices dropped nearly in half within the first three months of the year.
In recent years, the situation has been completely different. Q1 is usually a relatively positive period, or at least stable.
Even in 2022, the beginning of a prolonged bear cycle – the market in Q1 was mostly flat rather than crashing heavily.
See original
At what level does DUSK protect user data? When discussing data protection in blockchains, I always notice an intentional ambiguity. Many systems talk about privacy, but in reality, they are only talking about making data 'hard to read,' not controlling data at the architectural level. So when looking at DUSK, the question that interests me is not whether they use zero-knowledge, but rather which layers of the system actually protect user data, and which do not.

At what level does DUSK protect user data?



When discussing data protection in blockchains, I always notice an intentional ambiguity. Many systems talk about privacy, but in reality, they are only talking about making data 'hard to read,' not controlling data at the architectural level.
So when looking at DUSK, the question that interests me is not whether they use zero-knowledge, but rather which layers of the system actually protect user data, and which do not.
See original
Is DUSK Truly Decentralized? An Architectural Analysis I've been quite cautious whenever I see a chain claiming to be 'decentralized,' especially those targeting enterprise or compliance. My past experience shows these two often conflict: the more you want control, the harder it is to achieve real decentralization. So when looking at DUSK, the first question I ask myself isn't 'what technology are they using?', but rather how truly decentralized is this network, and what trade-offs did they make to achieve it?

Is DUSK Truly Decentralized? An Architectural Analysis



I've been quite cautious whenever I see a chain claiming to be 'decentralized,' especially those targeting enterprise or compliance. My past experience shows these two often conflict: the more you want control, the harder it is to achieve real decentralization.
So when looking at DUSK, the first question I ask myself isn't 'what technology are they using?', but rather how truly decentralized is this network, and what trade-offs did they make to achieve it?
See original
BTC – Long-Term Holder spending signals the final phase shift of the cycleBTC – Long-Term Holder spending signals the final phase shift of the cycle Recent data on the spending behavior of long-term holders (LTH) is revealing a familiar pattern, previously seen multiple times before key market turning points. Total LTH spending over the past 30 days is approaching levels seen at previous cycle peaks, when older coins, having been dormant for a long time, begin circulating again. Similar spikes occurred in 2013, 2017, and early 2021, all associated with periods of high volatility and market structure shifts.

BTC – Long-Term Holder spending signals the final phase shift of the cycle

BTC – Long-Term Holder spending signals the final phase shift of the cycle
Recent data on the spending behavior of long-term holders (LTH) is revealing a familiar pattern, previously seen multiple times before key market turning points.
Total LTH spending over the past 30 days is approaching levels seen at previous cycle peaks, when older coins, having been dormant for a long time, begin circulating again. Similar spikes occurred in 2013, 2017, and early 2021, all associated with periods of high volatility and market structure shifts.
See original
What makes DUSK different from Ethereum and Solana in the DeFi space? At first, I saw the DeFi landscape across chains quite simply: Ethereum was slow but secure, Solana was fast and cheap, and other chains usually tried to find a sufficiently different narrative to survive. This view isn't entirely wrong, but the more I dig deeper—especially when looking at DUSK—I realize it misses quite a few important aspects. From my perspective, Ethereum was built on a very strong assumption: the system can only be trustless if everything is public. When I've tested or deeply explored DeFi protocols on Ethereum, composability truly is a very clear advantage. The ability for contracts to seamlessly combine with each other is what truly fueled the ecosystem's explosion.

What makes DUSK different from Ethereum and Solana in the DeFi space?



At first, I saw the DeFi landscape across chains quite simply: Ethereum was slow but secure, Solana was fast and cheap, and other chains usually tried to find a sufficiently different narrative to survive. This view isn't entirely wrong, but the more I dig deeper—especially when looking at DUSK—I realize it misses quite a few important aspects.
From my perspective, Ethereum was built on a very strong assumption: the system can only be trustless if everything is public. When I've tested or deeply explored DeFi protocols on Ethereum, composability truly is a very clear advantage. The ability for contracts to seamlessly combine with each other is what truly fueled the ecosystem's explosion.
--
Bullish
See original
Whales are gradually exiting long positions at $BTC Investors holding large amounts of Bitcoin are closing leveraged long positions – a signal that often precedes strong market rallies. If this scenario continues, many analysts believe BTC could target the 135,000 USD mark. Currently, $BTC remains constrained within a narrow trading range, with declining liquidity, indicating the market is compressing for a major move ahead. The outlook ahead is quite clear: BTC needs to break and hold above 92,000 USD to confirm a new support zone Or adjust down to the 88,000 USD area to fill the open CME gap What do you guys think the market will do in the first quarter this year? #BTC
Whales are gradually exiting long positions at $BTC

Investors holding large amounts of Bitcoin are closing leveraged long positions – a signal that often precedes strong market rallies.

If this scenario continues, many analysts believe BTC could target the 135,000 USD mark.

Currently, $BTC remains constrained within a narrow trading range, with declining liquidity, indicating the market is compressing for a major move ahead.

The outlook ahead is quite clear:

BTC needs to break and hold above 92,000 USD to confirm a new support zone

Or adjust down to the 88,000 USD area to fill the open CME gap

What do you guys think the market will do in the first quarter this year?
#BTC
See original
AI agent storing long-term memory on Walrus When discussing AI agents storing long-term memory on Walrus, I believe this is not just a technically interesting use case, but a significant shift in how we envision AI as a persistent entity with lasting memory, rather than just a contextually reactive tool. Most current AI agents perform well within session or short-term context, but when it comes to "remembering" over long periods and across multiple operational stages, the underlying infrastructure becomes a major bottleneck.

AI agent storing long-term memory on Walrus


When discussing AI agents storing long-term memory on Walrus, I believe this is not just a technically interesting use case, but a significant shift in how we envision AI as a persistent entity with lasting memory, rather than just a contextually reactive tool.
Most current AI agents perform well within session or short-term context, but when it comes to "remembering" over long periods and across multiple operational stages, the underlying infrastructure becomes a major bottleneck.
See original
Ethereum sets historic record for stablecoin transactions The volume of stablecoin transactions on Ethereum has officially set a new all-time high. Within just one quarter, the total value of stablecoin payments reached 8 trillion USD — a figure demonstrating the rapidly growing real-world usage of this blockchain. To better visualize the impressive scale: Visa currently processes around 4 trillion USD per quarter Ethereum has recorded stablecoin payment volume twice that of Visa

Ethereum sets historic record for stablecoin transactions

The volume of stablecoin transactions on Ethereum has officially set a new all-time high.
Within just one quarter, the total value of stablecoin payments reached 8 trillion USD — a figure demonstrating the rapidly growing real-world usage of this blockchain.
To better visualize the impressive scale:
Visa currently processes around 4 trillion USD per quarter
Ethereum has recorded stablecoin payment volume twice that of Visa
See original
AI dataset hub: storing training data on Walrus When I think about an AI dataset hub, I don't see it as a pure data warehouse, but as the 'backbone' of the entire AI value chain. Data is not just collected and stored, but also standardized, identified, traced, and reused throughout the model lifecycle. In the context of AI increasingly relying on large, diverse, and long-lived data, my core question is no longer 'do we have data?' but rather 'where is the data stored, who controls it, and how is the value generated from the data distributed?'

AI dataset hub: storing training data on Walrus


When I think about an AI dataset hub, I don't see it as a pure data warehouse, but as the 'backbone' of the entire AI value chain.
Data is not just collected and stored, but also standardized, identified, traced, and reused throughout the model lifecycle.
In the context of AI increasingly relying on large, diverse, and long-lived data, my core question is no longer 'do we have data?' but rather 'where is the data stored, who controls it, and how is the value generated from the data distributed?'
See original
Dusk and the Potential to Become the Standard Blockchain for European Banks One evening, I tried placing Dusk Network into a question that sounded very "heavy": can a blockchain become the standard infrastructure for European banks? Not just a trial or a PoC, but becoming a technology layer trusted enough for banks to rely on long-term. When we set aside crypto hype and look from the European perspective—where law, privacy, and system stability are paramount—Dusk suddenly becomes a very compelling case.

Dusk and the Potential to Become the Standard Blockchain for European Banks



One evening, I tried placing Dusk Network into a question that sounded very "heavy": can a blockchain become the standard infrastructure for European banks?
Not just a trial or a PoC, but becoming a technology layer trusted enough for banks to rely on long-term.
When we set aside crypto hype and look from the European perspective—where law, privacy, and system stability are paramount—Dusk suddenly becomes a very compelling case.
See original
Bitcoin Repeats 2020 Cycle: Expectations Heading Toward the 200,000 USD MarkBitcoin ($BTC ) is currently showing quite similar signs to the 2020 market cycle — marking the beginning of a strong and prolonged upward trend. In my view, the price structure is gradually forming according to a familiar pattern: a sharp decline phase aimed at cleansing the market ➜ a consolidation phase for accumulation ➜ followed by a parabolic growth phase when buying pressure dominates.

Bitcoin Repeats 2020 Cycle: Expectations Heading Toward the 200,000 USD Mark

Bitcoin ($BTC ) is currently showing quite similar signs to the 2020 market cycle — marking the beginning of a strong and prolonged upward trend.
In my view, the price structure is gradually forming according to a familiar pattern: a sharp decline phase aimed at cleansing the market ➜ a consolidation phase for accumulation ➜ followed by a parabolic growth phase when buying pressure dominates.
See original
Comparing Dusk with Aztec and Secret Network in the Confidential DeFi Space When placing Dusk alongside Aztec and Secret Network in the confidential DeFi space, I think the most reasonable way to compare them is not to ask 'who is more private?', but rather: which ecosystem is solving privacy problems for whom, and in what context? These three projects are often grouped together because they all talk about privacy, but in reality, they stand at very different points along the product–regulation–user axis. If this distinction isn't clearly made, it's easy to fall into superficial comparisons.

Comparing Dusk with Aztec and Secret Network in the Confidential DeFi Space



When placing Dusk alongside Aztec and Secret Network in the confidential DeFi space, I think the most reasonable way to compare them is not to ask 'who is more private?', but rather: which ecosystem is solving privacy problems for whom, and in what context?
These three projects are often grouped together because they all talk about privacy, but in reality, they stand at very different points along the product–regulation–user axis.
If this distinction isn't clearly made, it's easy to fall into superficial comparisons.
See original
DAOs Managing Community Data, Walrus as the Data Layer When discussing DAOs managing community data with Walrus as the data layer, I think we should start with a rather paradoxical truth: DAOs were born to enable collective governance, yet the data of that collective is often fragmented, inconsistent, and dependent on external parties. Discord, forums, Google Docs, Notion, scattered IPFS links… all exist, but nothing truly belongs to the DAO in the sense of infrastructure.

DAOs Managing Community Data, Walrus as the Data Layer



When discussing DAOs managing community data with Walrus as the data layer, I think we should start with a rather paradoxical truth: DAOs were born to enable collective governance, yet the data of that collective is often fragmented, inconsistent, and dependent on external parties.
Discord, forums, Google Docs, Notion, scattered IPFS links… all exist, but nothing truly belongs to the DAO in the sense of infrastructure.
See original
Bitcoin Rises 15% at the Start of the Year: Genuine Recovery Signal or Just a Short-Term Rebound?Bitcoin $BTC has risen by about 15% recently. For me, this is the first notable rebound since the October 10 event, but the big question remains: is this a sign of a genuine recovery, or just a temporary bounce? What caught my attention is that Bitcoin has found a clear support level around the actual price of the Bitcoin ETF, approximately $85,000 — which is also the average cost basis of the ETF investor group.

Bitcoin Rises 15% at the Start of the Year: Genuine Recovery Signal or Just a Short-Term Rebound?

Bitcoin $BTC has risen by about 15% recently. For me, this is the first notable rebound since the October 10 event, but the big question remains: is this a sign of a genuine recovery, or just a temporary bounce?
What caught my attention is that Bitcoin has found a clear support level around the actual price of the Bitcoin ETF, approximately $85,000 — which is also the average cost basis of the ETF investor group.
See original
DUSK's Tokenomics Model and Its Long-Term Impact on Network Security One evening, I tried looking at the Dusk Network not from the angle of privacy or RWA, but from a much more mundane question: what is DUSK's tokenomics encouraging, and how does that impact network security in the long term? Ultimately, every architecture collapses if incentives are misaligned. No matter how good the privacy or compliance is, if the economic model fails to keep validators and participants honest, the network will only exist on paper.

DUSK's Tokenomics Model and Its Long-Term Impact on Network Security



One evening, I tried looking at the Dusk Network not from the angle of privacy or RWA, but from a much more mundane question: what is DUSK's tokenomics encouraging, and how does that impact network security in the long term?
Ultimately, every architecture collapses if incentives are misaligned. No matter how good the privacy or compliance is, if the economic model fails to keep validators and participants honest, the network will only exist on paper.
See original
Data Backup System for Sui dApp Using Walrus One evening, I reviewed the architecture of many Sui dApps and realized a common pattern: on-chain logic is solid, but vital data lies in fragile places. Metadata, state history, user files, AI outputs, application logs—these are all kept in the backend or centralized storage. When everything runs smoothly, no one notices. But when the backend fails, the team leaves, or funding runs out, the question 'Is the dApp's data still there?' becomes extremely terrifying.

Data Backup System for Sui dApp Using Walrus



One evening, I reviewed the architecture of many Sui dApps and realized a common pattern: on-chain logic is solid, but vital data lies in fragile places.
Metadata, state history, user files, AI outputs, application logs—these are all kept in the backend or centralized storage.
When everything runs smoothly, no one notices. But when the backend fails, the team leaves, or funding runs out, the question 'Is the dApp's data still there?' becomes extremely terrifying.
See original
Can Walrus Become a Platform for On-Chain Reputation Systems One evening I reflected on reputation in Web3 and realized something quite ironic: we talk a lot about trustlessness, yet we lack a place to preserve the 'memory' of behavior. Wallets, contracts, agents, DAOs can exist for years, but their behavioral histories are fragmented, easily lost, and often reside in third-party databases. If reputation is formed from repeated behavior over time, then Web3 today is precisely missing that piece.

Can Walrus Become a Platform for On-Chain Reputation Systems



One evening I reflected on reputation in Web3 and realized something quite ironic: we talk a lot about trustlessness, yet we lack a place to preserve the 'memory' of behavior.
Wallets, contracts, agents, DAOs can exist for years, but their behavioral histories are fragmented, easily lost, and often reside in third-party databases.
If reputation is formed from repeated behavior over time, then Web3 today is precisely missing that piece.
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

Aqsa_Queen
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs