TLDR:
Polymarket trader sb911 earned $106K in one month with only 25.51% winning predictions.
Strategy focused on buying multiple Elon Musk tweet ranges at 1 to 10 cents per share.
One winning trade turned $1,100 into $79,000 for over 6,600% return on investment.
Approach relied on asymmetric payoffs where small losses fund rare explosive wins.
A Polymarket trader has generated over $106,000 in profit during the past month despite winning only one in four predictions.
The counterintuitive performance has sparked discussion about probability trading versus traditional speculation.
Trader sb911 completed 294 predictions with just 75 wins, yet walked away with substantial returns. The strategy relied on asymmetric payoffs rather than prediction accuracy.
Betting on Predictable Behavior Patterns
The core of sb911’s approach centered on weekly markets asking how many times Elon Musk would post on X.
Data from Lookonchain shows these markets appeared repeatedly with defined tweet ranges. Each week featured multiple options like 200 to 219 tweets, 220 to 239, and 240 to 259.
Musk’s posting habits remain statistically consistent over short periods. This consistency made the activity measurable rather than random.
The trader didn’t attempt to pinpoint exact outcomes.
Instead, sb911 purchased shares across several adjacent ranges in the same week. Polymarket structures each range as a separate betting market. However, tweet counts follow continuous probability distributions.
By covering multiple brackets simultaneously, the strategy captured most realistic outcomes. The method treated connected ranges as a single probability spectrum.
Entry prices played a critical role in the math.
Many winning positions cost just 1 cent, 3 cents, or 5 cents per share. Correct predictions settled at 100 cents per share. This created extreme upside with limited downside risk.
A $1,100 investment in one position returned roughly $79,000. That single trade represented a return over 6,600 percent.
How this Polymarket trader made $106K in 1 month
Low win rate.
Huge profits.
This isn't luck — it's probability.
1/ Let's break down how trader sb911 did it 
pic.twitter.com/41BaaBrg0n
— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) January 11, 2026
Small Losses Fund Rare Explosive Wins
Most individual bets ended in total loss.
The trader’s history shows dozens of positions dropping to zero value. This wasn’t a flaw in execution but a feature of the design. The approach accepted frequent small failures to capture infrequent massive successes.
Position sizing kept losses manageable while wins compounded dramatically.
According to Lookonchain, sb911 focused on events with clear resolution rules and repeating patterns.
The markets resolved based on verifiable tweet counts rather than subjective outcomes. This eliminated ambiguity and allowed probability modeling. The trader wasn’t guessing which specific range would hit. The question became whether realistic scenarios could be covered at favorable prices.
The 25 percent win rate masked the actual profitability mechanism. Expected value calculations drove decision making rather than win frequency.
Shares purchased for pennies occasionally exploded in value when ranges hit. One successful outcome funded dozens of failed attempts. This math works when upside multiples dwarf the frequency of wins.
Traditional prediction accuracy metrics don’t capture this type of trading.
Win rates measure correctness but ignore position sizing and payout ratios. A portfolio can lose money with 75 percent accuracy if losses outweigh gains.
Conversely, 25 percent accuracy becomes profitable when winners return 50x or 100x their cost. The sb911 case demonstrates trading probability distributions across correlated markets rather than isolated predictions.
The post How One Polymarket User Turned Losing Bets Into $106K Monthly Profit appeared first on Blockonomi.