Everyone talks about real-world asset tokenization.
Almost no one is ready for the moment when the regulator enters the room š¬
RWA is not just about issuing a token. It involves legal requirements, audits, access control, data protection, and responsibility toward market participants. Historically, most blockchain networks were built either for full transparency or for pseudo-privacy that breaks the moment compliance requirements appear.
This creates a fundamental conflict:
financial markets need privacy, while regulators need verifiability.
For years, the market pretended this problem could be āsolved later.ā
In reality, it must be solved at the protocol level, not through off-chain procedures or trust in intermediaries.
This is exactly how @Dusk was designed from the start. Dusk builds an architecture that allows sensitive participant data to remain confidential while still enabling audits, verification, and rule enforcement directly on-chain. This is not an add-on or a temporary workaround ā it is the foundation of the network.
In this model, $DUSK plays a clear utility role. It is used for staking, securing the network, paying fees, and aligning economic incentives. The token is embedded into the ecosystemās operation, not created to support a speculative narrative.
Most RWA projects are ready for presentations.
Dusk is ready for real markets.
Do you think RWA can truly scale without built-in compliance ā or will the market realize this too late again? š
#dusk #RWA #blockchain #CryptoInfrastructure #Web3 $DUSK šā ļø
@Dusk šš