ml

Tiek lēsts, ka tas ir aptuveni 91,4 miljoni USD.
15. decembrī Token Unlocks dati liecināja, ka ARB, APE, QAI un citi marķieri tiks atbloķēti lielos apjomos nākamnedēļ, cita starpā:
Arbitrum (ARB) 16. decembrī plkst. 21:00 pēc Singapūras laika atbloķēs aptuveni 92,65 miljonus žetonu, kas veido 2,26 procentus no pašreizējā apgrozībā esošā apjoma un ir aptuveni 91,4 miljonu dolāru vērtībā;

How it was built and why it matters — I’m starting here because if you don’t feel the problem in your bones you’ll miss why #APRO matters, they’re trying to solve something that’s quietly enormous: blockchains are brilliant at preserving and verifying state once it lives on chain, but most of the real world — prices, weather, identity attestations, sports scores, real estate events — doesn’t live there, and that gap creates constant friction, fragile trust, and expensive engineering workarounds, so APRO was conceived as a practical answer, a living bridge designed to carry accurate, timely, and verifiable facts from the messy off-chain world into deterministic on-chain environments while minimizing cost, latency, and the opportunity for manipulation. How it works from the foundation up — imagine a two-layer network where the bottom layer is a set of distributed, accountable data producers and verifiers operating off-chain and the top layer is an on-chain anchoring and delivery substrate; data starts its journey in Data Push mode when an off-chain provider or sensor proactively sends fresh measurements into the system, or in Data Pull mode when a smart contract or user asks for a one-off value and the system goes and fetches it, and from that first handshake the data passes through automated sanity checks, AI-driven verification routines that compare the incoming feed against multiple independent sources and historical patterns, and a verifiable randomness mechanism that prevents ordered manipulation and ensures that any sampled validators haven’t conspired to bias a result. The choice to support both push and pull is practical and human — there are streams you want continuously ingested so on-chain actors can rely on live values, and there are volatile, expensive, or one-off facts you only want fetched when necessary to save gas and reduce on-chain noise. The two-layer architecture matters because it separates concerns: the off-chain layer focuses on flexible sourcing, preprocessing, and cross-check logic where heavy #ML verification and complex adapters live, while the on-chain layer focuses on finality, accountability, and cryptographic proofs, so they’re not trying to do everything in one place which would be slow and costly, and that design shapes every technical trade-off — latency is reduced because not every small check needs to be written to chain, and security is preserved because the crucial attestations are anchored on chain with signatures, Merkle proofs, and time-bound receipts. What technical choices truly matter and how they shape the system — first, the decision to pair AI-driven anomaly detection with traditional multi-source consensus means APRO looks for both statistical outliers and cross-source divergence, so you’re watching models for drift as well as watching for economic incentives that can corrupt feeds, and that dual approach catches subtle attacks that pure majority-voting would miss; second, the verifiable randomness function has to be both unpredictable and auditable, so APRO’s randomness design reduces targeted sampling attacks while providing a public trail to dispute sample selection after the fact, which changes the security model from “who can influence every sample” to “who tried and how we detected it”; third, the protocol’s support for many asset classes and over forty chains required modular adapters and light clients or relayers, and that architectural modularity means integrating a new exchange, a government registry, or a proprietary sensor network is a local change rather than a redesign of the whole stack, which keeps costs down for end users and lets the network scale horizontally by adding specialist sources rather than centralizing everything. What real problem it solves — in practice this looks like reducing settlement risk for DeFi protocols that need accurate external prices without relying on a single exchange or fragile medianizers, enabling real-world asset tokenization where legal events like transfers or liens must trigger on-chain behavior, powering games that require trusted external randomness and off-chain events, and letting oracles serve as reliable middleware for automated markets and insurance products where delays or erroneous data mean real money lost; the human effect is subtle but powerful — developers don’t need to reinvent trust every time, and people building on chains can actually connect contracts to the real world without exposing themselves to single points of failure. What important metrics people should watch and what those numbers mean — uptime and latency are obvious: uptime near 100% and predictable latency mean your contracts won’t stall, but the deeper metrics are data source diversity (how many independent providers are being aggregated for each feed — more diversity usually means lower systemic risk), verification false positive/negative rates (how often the #Aİ Aflags anomalies correctly versus incorrectly — a high false positive rate can needlessly delay updates, a high false negative rate is dangerous), economic stake || slashing exposure (what proportion of stake or bonded collateral stands behind a node’s attestations — higher bonded stake aligns incentives but can concentrate risk), and dispute resolution frequency and resolution time (how often consumers challenge values and how quickly they’re resolved; frequent disputes indicate either contentious data or poor aggregation logic). Those numbers matter because they translate into real choices for contract designers: if average latency is 2 seconds but dispute resolution takes hours, you don’t use the feed for intra-block settlement; if diversity is low you hedge by cross-checking elsewhere; and if slashing is small and rare you might be comfortable trusting feeds for high-value settlement but you should watch for correlated counterparty failures. Real structural risks and weaknesses — #APRO is not immune to classic oracle hazards: correlated external failures where many trusted sources all rely on the same upstream provider, economic attacks where an adversary funds fake or manipulated sources, governance risks where protocol upgrades change verification rules in ways that favor insiders, #ML model drift where the $AI begins to misclassify new normal behaviors as anomalies or misses subtle manipulation, and integration complexity across dozens of chains which raises the surface area for relay failures. None of these is fatal but none should be minimised: the right response is humility and layered defense — encourage many small independent providers, design strong economic incentives and meaningful slashing, maintain transparent upgrade paths with time-locks and multisig checkpoints, run continuous retraining and red-team ML exercises, and automate fallbacks that degrade gracefully rather than catastrophically. What users and builders should expect day to day — we’re seeing oracle usage pattern variability where some clients want ultra-low-latency price ticks and others want cryptographic proof bundles for legal compliance, so #APRO ’s dual push/pull model maps well to both, and I’ve noticed teams adopt push for live market feeds and pull for certified events, which is a sensible division that helps manage cost and trust. How the future might realistically unfold in both slow-growth and fast-adoption scenarios — in the slow-growth case APRO incrementally becomes a reliable middleware layer adopted by niche $DEFI desks, certain $NFT platforms, and tokenized real estate projects, gradually maturing its data adapters and gaining reputation through consistent uptime and a low dispute rate, and over several years it becomes one option among many where integrations are chosen pragmatically by cost and geographic coverage; in the fast-adoption case a few high-visibility integrations — perhaps a major derivatives venue or a widely used lending protocol — lean on #APRO and demonstrate robust performance during market stress, that trust cascades, more sources plug in to meet demand, and #APRO modular adapters and cross-chain reach make it a de-facto standard for multi-chain applications, but that growth will also force hard engineering trade-offs about decentralization versus performance and will require serious governance muscle to keep incentives aligned. The human center of all this — at the end of the day #APRO is about people wanting systems they can rely on without spending months building bespoke plumbing, it’s about teams that want to move faster and users who want predictable outcomes, and that’s why technical choices like modular adapters, #AI verification, verifiable randomness, and two-layer separation aren’t academic — they’re practical decisions that shape developers’ workflows, legal teams’ comfort, and end users’ trust. If it becomes widely used, we’ll see richer on-chain products and fewer brittle, single-point failures, and if growth is slow we still get a sturdier toolkit for specialized applications; either path demands disciplined engineering and transparent economics. In closing, I’m left with a quiet optimism about designs that respect both the messy reality of off-chain data and the strict determinism of blockchains, and #APRO reads to me like an attempt to make that respect operational, to give builders a way to stitch the world into smart contracts without pretending the world is simpler than it is, so as we move forward the measure of success will not be flashy integrations alone but consistent, ordinary reliability — the small, steady moments where a price update or a randomness draw happens exactly when it should, disputes are handled fairly, and people get on with building things that actually help others — that’s the future worth aiming for.
#APRO
#ML
#NFT​

Kas ir Mintlayer (ML)?Mintlayer ir otrā slāņa risinājums, kas ļauj izveidot decentralizētu finanšu ekosistēmu Bitcoin blokķēdē. Tas ļauj integrēt DeFi, viedos līgumus, atomu mijmaiņas darījumus, NFT un dapps.Kāpēc izvēlēties DeFi vietnē Bitcoin?Mintlayer atbild uz jautājumu, kā DeFi ievest Bitcoin blokķēdē. Tā ir vērsta uz decentralizētas finanšu ekosistēmas izveidi, izmantojot Bitcoin un Lightning tīklu. Mērķis ir BTC blokķēdē izvietot viedos līgumus un galu galā izveidot decentralizētu apmaiņu (DEX). Šī integrācija paver jaunas iespējas reālās pasaules finanšu lietojumprogrammām Bitcoin blokķēdē.

✅Jaunajiem. Ievadiet savus #Criptomonedas en #earn . Daudziem veterāniem tas liksies ļoti smieklīgi, jo viņi to zinās. Bet no bijušā iesācēja un tagadējā tirgotāja, kas atbalsta citus iesācējus, dari to: Earn būtībā ir kā cetes vai procenti Nu vai #ML , tie sniedz procentus par jūsu kriptovalūtām tikai par to, ka tās turat tur. Tas nekas nemaksā un ir atbalsts
Iesaku 💯 Binance Earn!

$BTC
$ETH
$BNB
#Binance #BİNANCE