brca

Senate Judiciary Committee leaders Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) have recently pushed back against a sweeping crypto market structure bill, specifically targeting provisions meant to protect noncustodial software developers.
​As of January 16, 2026, this friction has become a major hurdle for the legislation's progress. Here is the breakdown of why this is happening and what it means for the crypto industry.
​The Core Conflict: Jurisdictional Disputes
​The primary reason for the pushback isn't necessarily a hatred for developers, but a procedural power struggle.
​The "Banking" Bill: The Senate Banking Committee released a 270-page draft that included the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA).
​The Judiciary’s Grievance: Grassley and Durbin argue that the Banking Committee overstepped its bounds. Because the bill involves changes to Title 18 (the federal criminal code), the Judiciary Committee claims jurisdiction.
​Lack of Consultation: In a letter released on Friday, the leaders stated they were not given the opportunity to "meaningfully review" the changes before the bill was sent for a planned markup.
​What the BRCA Aims to Do
​The specific part of the bill being contested—the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act—is highly favored by the crypto industry. It seeks to clarify that:
​Developers are not "Banks": Noncustodial software developers, miners, and validators who do not control user funds should not be classified as "money transmitters."
​Exemptions: It would create clear legal guardrails to ensure that simply writing code or maintaining a network does not subject a person to the same burdensome regulations as a centralized exchange like Coinbase.
​Broader Industry Tension
​The Judiciary Committee's intervention adds to a growing list of problems for the bill:
​Exchange Opposition: Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong recently stated the exchange cannot support the bill as written, citing concerns over "tokenized equities" and provisions that could "kill rewards on stablecoins."
​DeFi Uncertainty: Industry insiders have "baulked" at new disclosure requirements for decentralized finance (DeFi) and a new test to determine if a project is "sufficiently decentralized."
​Bipartisan Pressure: While Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden are championing the developer protections as a standalone bill to ensure they aren't lost, the Judiciary Committee’s stance puts the broader package in jeopardy.
​What’s Next?
​The Senate Banking Committee must now decide whether to amend the bill to satisfy the Judiciary leaders or risk a floor fight that could stall crypto regulation for the remainder of 2026.
​Key takeaway: The pushback is less about the merit of protecting developers and more about who gets to write the criminal laws governing them.
#CryptoLegalization
#BRCA
#CryptoETFMonth
$SLP $QNT $SAND

Sveiki visi! Apspriedīsim karstu temu no Vashingtonas, kas varētu būt spēcīgs mainītājs visai industrijai. Liekas, ka pēc gadiem neizbēgamas nevienlīdzības ASV nopietni strādā pie kriptovalūtas likumiskā regulējuma izveides. Un viens no galvenajiem punktiem ir tehnoloģiju veidotāju aizsardzība.
Kas notiek?
Senators Cindija Lummis un Rons Vīdens ir ieviesuši Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA). Tā būtība ir vienkārša, taču revolucionāra: tādi izstrādātāji, kuriem nav piekļuves lietotāju līdzekļiem, nedrīkst tikt uzskatīti par finanšu starpniekiem (piemēram, bankām vai naudas pārvedējiem).

DeFi Under Threat? U.S. Crypto Leaders Push Back with Major Policy Move
8 top crypto policy groups just fired a shot — and it could decide the future of #DeFi in the U.S.
A powerful coalition, including Coin Center, Solana Policy Institute, #Blockchain Association, and Paradigm, just issued a joint statement to Congress.
Their mission?
👉 Get the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) added to the upcoming Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025.
This isn’t just politics — it’s survival.
What’s the BRCA & Why Does It Matter?
The #BRCA is a bipartisan bill backed by Rep. Tom Emmer and Rep. Ritchie Torres.
It aims to:
✔️ Protect non-custodial developers
✔️ Shield DeFi infrastructure providers
✔️ Make sure builders aren’t treated like banks or money transmitters
In simple terms:
“If you don’t hold user funds, you’re NOT a money transmitter. Period.”
That’s the message — loud and clear.
Why This Could Change Everything
Without this legal clarity:
⛔ Open-source developers could face serious legal risks
⚠️ U.S. innovation could be pushed overseas
📉 Investors could lose access to safe, decentralized tools
And that’s exactly why groups like the DeFi Education Fund, Bitcoin Policy Institute, and the Chamber of Digital Commerce are rallying now.
🇺🇸 What’s Next?
Congress is set to revise the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act next week.
The crypto community is watching closely to see if BRCA makes the cut.
Because this isn’t just a policy tweak —
It’s about protecting the very foundation of DeFi in America.
Final Thoughts
Want DeFi to thrive in the U.S.?
Then this bill needs to pass — full stop.
📣 Follow @CryptoPatel for live updates on crypto law and DeFi regulation
💬 What’s your take — Should devs be treated like banks?
🔁 Repost this if you believe open-source should stay free and fearless

$BTC $BMT $XNO