volumeanalysis

Sveiki, tirgotāji! 👋
Vai jums kadreiz gadījies šāds gadījums?
Skatieties, ka Bitcoin pārkāpj svarīgu pretestību. Jūs ienākat uzjautrināts, iegādājoties pārkāpumu... un pēkšņi cena maina virzienu un strauji kritīs. 📉
Jūs tikko esat apēdis "Mākslīgo pārkāpumu" (Fakeout).
Kā jūs to varētu novērst? Skatoties uz tirgus patiesāko rādītāju: apjomu.
🔍 Kas tas ir un kāpēc tas ir svarīgi?
Apjoms atspoguļo naudas un darījumu daudzumu, kas notiek noteiktā brīdī.
Iedomājieties to kā "degvielu" kustībai:

Have you ever stared at a chart and thought, something big is happening here, just because the volume bar suddenly grew teeth?
I’ve caught myself doing that more times than I’d like to admit.
Volume feels honest. Numbers don’t lie, right? More activity should mean more conviction. More interest. More truth.
But then the market moves… and nothing follows. Or worse, it moves the other way. That’s when the doubt creeps in.
What exactly did that volume represent? Real participation, or just noise amplified by structure?
I’ve seen days where volume spikes aggressively, yet price barely travels. It looks busy, almost dramatic. But busy doesn’t always mean meaningful. Sometimes it’s just the same liquidity being passed around faster. The same hands, rotating positions, creating the appearance of demand or supply. Is that strength, or just friction?
And then there are quiet periods. Volume dries up. Everything feels dead. Yet price suddenly slides or lifts with surprising ease. How does that happen if “no one is trading”? Maybe the absence of volume is saying more than its presence ever did.
Another uncomfortable thought: how much of what we call volume is reactive, not intentional? Chasing moves already in progress. Late participation masquerading as confirmation. If volume arrives after the move, is it really validating anything—or just documenting hesitation?
There’s also the context we rarely talk about. Where is that volume occurring? After a long trend, or inside a range that’s been chewed on for weeks? Are participants building something, or just exiting positions they no longer want to hold? The same number can mean completely different things depending on when and where it shows up.
I’ve started treating volume less like a signal and more like a question mark. Not something that answers my doubts, but something that forces better ones. Why here? Why now? Who benefits from this activity, and who might be getting trapped by it?
The shift for me was subtle: volume stopped being proof, and became a clue—one that needs context, patience, and a bit of skepticism.
So the next time volume spikes and everyone seems convinced, what do you think it’s actually revealing: commitment, confusion, or simply movement without meaning?
#VolumeAnalysis #CryptoTruth #Binance