THX738

Why Most “Trading Advice” Accounts Don’t Trade at All
Many accounts that give trading advice don’t actually trade. In reality, around 90% of them risk nothing but their reputation. They make money not from the market, but from #Write2Earn posts, referrals, ads, and paid groups. When their ideas fail, it’s not their capital on the line — it’s yours. This creates a dangerous imbalance: followers take real financial risk, while “gurus” collect views and engagement. Their goal is consistency in content, not consistency in profits. Always remember: if someone truly had a reliable edge, they wouldn’t need to give #signals daily.
Only ~48.5 % of copy-trading followers were profitable over the period.
While ~97 % of leaders showed positive profit on their own accounts, only **~43.6 % of those leaders actually generated positive returns for followers.
This means even among traders people choose to follow, fewer than half delivered profitable results for the followers.
In a small competition reported on a trading platform (not #Binance itself), only 19 out of 100 “top influencers” remained profitable, and many lost most of their starting capital.
They Don’t Trade — You Do (With Your Money)! #BinanceSquare

#TrumpCancelsEUTariffThreat #WEFDavos2026

Trading on weekends is a perfect illusion. Charts move, candles print, hope survives — but your balance quietly dies. While you wait for “the big move,” #FundingRates are doing their job, eating your account one cycle at a time.
Liquidity on weekends is thin. Very thin. That means wider spreads, random wicks, and price moves that exist only to hunt stops. No real volume, no real trend — just noise and traps. Technical analysis? Decorative.
Price can stay flat for two days, yet your balance shrinks. Not because you were wrong, but because you stayed open. Funding doesn’t care about direction, bias, or patience. It charges you for existing.
Smart traders close positions on Friday. Not because they are scared — but because they understand math. Weekends are not for trading. They are for exchanges to collect fees and for traders to learn humility.
If you want action on weekends, open Netflix — not positions!
#WeekendWisdom #USIranMarketImpact

Gold does not believe in speeches, summits, or “historic peace agreements.” It reacts only to risk. Every major war of the last century proves the same rule: when global order cracks, gold reprices instantly.
During World War II, gold-backed currencies became the last anchor of trust. During the Iraq War (2003), gold rose over 25% in two years as oil shocks and military spending exploded deficits. After 2020, amid global conflict escalation and sanctions warfare, central banks bought over 1,000 tons of gold annually, the highest level in modern history.
Markets understand something politicians won’t say: modern wars are economic first. Sanctions freeze reserves, debt replaces diplomacy, and fiat currencies are weaponized. This is why $XAU /USDT matters. It removes banks, borders, and governments from the equation — pure fear pricing against a synthetic dollar.
“Peace” usually brings short-term pullbacks. Ceasefires reduce headlines, yields rise, and gold pauses. But unresolved debt, fractured supply chains, and multipolar power struggles keep long-term pressure intact.
Gold doesn’t rally because war starts.
Gold rallies because the system breaks.
XAU/USDT is not optimism.
It’s a hedge against lies.
#WEFDavos2026 #GoldSilverAtRecordHighs

Perché un Crypto 2026 è un'illusione
Ogni ciclo principale delle criptovalute ha raggiunto il picco 12-18 mesi dopo un dimezzamento di Bitcoin. Secondo gli standard storici, il 2026 si colloca saldamente nella fase di decadenza tardiva del ciclo, dove la liquidità esce e le narrazioni sostituiscono i fondamentali. Scommettere su un nuovo mercato rialzista a questo punto non è analisi — è negazione.
Questa volta, il contesto macroeconomico è peggiore. Il mondo sta scivolando verso la frammentazione politica e un nuovo ordine globale instabile. La politica statunitense somiglia a uno spettacolo di realtà, con figure come Trump che iniettano caos, ego e imprevedibilità nei mercati che dipendono dalla fiducia e dalla stabilità.

Trading futures on #Binance may look attractive because of high leverage and the promise of quick profits, but for most traders it is a losing game. The main risk is leverage itself. Even small market movements can wipe out an entire position, leading to fast #Liquidations that leave no room for recovery.
Another problem is funding fees. Many beginners underestimate how these periodic payments slowly drain their balance, even when the market moves sideways. Over time, this turns trading into a negative-sum game for retail users.
Emotions also play a major role. Futures trading encourages overtrading, revenge trades, and poor risk management, especially in a highly volatile crypto market. Combined with fees, slippage, and liquidation mechanics, the odds are heavily stacked against inexperienced traders.
For most people, spot trading or long-term investing is far more sustainable than trying to beat the #futures market on Binance.

#MarketRebound