I paid attention to Vanar when execution started feeling quieter, not faster. That difference matters more than most people think.
There was a period where average execution cost moved from around half a dollar toward the low cent range. In live systems, that kind of shift usually signals a structural change, not a temporary fluctuation.
In my experience, costs drop sustainably only when wasted execution paths get removed. Fewer retries, fewer failed settlements, fewer edge case corrections.
What stands out in Vanar’s model is that execution is constrained by settlement conditions upfront. Actions do not enter the pipeline unless finality is predictable. That shrinks the correction layer before it forms.
To me, that explains the fee behavior better than any speed claim. Less operational waste, not more raw throughput.
It also reframes VANRY as execution infrastructure, not an activity incentive. For automated systems, predictable cost beats low cost every time.