Jeonlees

My article was forwarded by the official account!! Thank you for the official recognition!! @Binance News I will continue to create 💪@币安广场

Alpha players participating in the booster task today have something very important to note:
‼️ It is said that points will be deducted, but there is an explanation: the rewards will be distributed by lottery.
Participation will result in point deductions, but those who do not win will have their points refunded 48 hours after the rewards are distributed.
However, this is a long time, and you have to wait for this project to distribute rewards.
Currently, there are fewer airdrops, and everyone has many points. If someone plans to leave today, I suggest they participate, but for those who are not leaving, the points might not differ much from others, so they should consider not participating.
Participating in the task is relatively simple: just follow, retweet, create a username, and read the file to complete it.
The amount of rewards is currently unknown, so let’s look forward to it like scratching a lottery ticket.
#booster

$ROBO 28u sold
Surprisingly, it's being pumped. Are they giving the new investors their money back? Hahaha

The lost memories have returned
It turns out that $RVV is the previous TGE project. I took a glance at the direct interaction records of the wallet.
Previously, 509 could sell for 10u, now 254 are worth 0.4 yuan.

The booster $RVV can be claimed again
Worth 0.235 yuan, received in stages
I don't understand if I did less or if everyone is like this
This booster reward should be the worst in history
Those who have done it can go to the wallet to claim
#booster

Every day brushing alpha must be the series of love and hate with $ARTX , impossible to untangle, messy when cut, a unique flavor in the heart
However, today there are two airdrops, hoping for some change😭
Note: Recently, when brushing alpha, it must be in small amounts!!
#alpha

Mr. Tang's greatness needs no further words!!!
@ZEROBASE The number of places for the task platform activity has increased from the top 20 to the top 100, and Mr. Tang is also preparing physical rewards for everyone. Looking forward to what it will be. 😁
Based on past participation, there are usually tens of thousands of people involved.
So it's a grand celebration for tens of thousands of people.
I often see Mr. Tang giving out milk tea on x, I wonder if everyone will get a cup of milk tea, hahaha.
But I don't know if the final prize pool $ZBT will increase.
Looking forward to it~~~~~~~
#Zerobase

I went around Zerobase's interface and materials today. To be honest, its most "hot" point right now is not about storytelling, but rather that it has positioned itself in a very sensitive track:
ZK proof services + confidential computing (TEE) kind of infrastructure work, doing well is a true necessity, but doing poorly can easily become a "hard concept, soft on-chain" situation.
In terms of price, $ZBT has basically been hovering around $0.07 these past few days, with a 24h trading volume of about a few million to ten million dollars, and a market cap of around ten to twenty million dollars, which belongs to the kind of market that "can be magnified by a slight breeze." More critically, after it was listed on major exchanges early on (Binance's related product lines also provided an entry point back then), liquidity has indeed been smoother than many projects of similar size, but that also means: during a rise it feels more like "there's a way to run," and during a drop it feels more like "there's a way to exit"—don't fantasize that it will protect the market. Recently, I saw discussions in the community mentioning that they are promoting a somewhat quantitative yield/strategy play, even introducing designs like "burning tokens for qualifications"—these things can create narratives of supply contraction in the short term, but I care more about two things: first, whether what is burned is actually air or cost (whether there are real revenues or demands to hedge); second, whether the holdings and transactions on the contract side are inflating together (otherwise, it's just pure emotional rise).
My own survival strategy is very simple: not getting caught up in slogans, just focusing on three lines—can the spot depth catch the pullback, is the on-chain/announcement rhythm sustained, and is the funding shifting from "trading excitement" to "real usage." Writing this, I won't pretend to be a prophet; whether Zerobase can make it out relies not on my stubbornness, but on whether it can turn "proof services" into a business. @ZEROBASE $ZBT
#Zerobase

$FOGO The current wave of popularity is more about the combination of 'event + liquidity', rather than a strong trend that can be concluded at a glance. Data-wise, I use the public market as an anchor: as of 2026-02-26, the value of $$FOGO is approximately in the range of $0.027–$0.029, with a 24h trading volume of about $19M, a market cap of around $1.1 billion, a circulation of about 3.78 billion coins, and a total supply of about 9.95 billion coins (different platforms may have slight deviations, but the magnitude is consistent).
In terms of hotspots, the most direct one is the CreatorPad's 2,000,000 FOGO voucher event (2/13–2/27 UTC), which will force the traffic from the content side and the attention from the trading side onto the same line, so you will see more discussions about 'people starting to seriously look at volume, net inflow, and concentration.' However, in my own experience: such events can create 'heat', but they do not necessarily create 'retention'; it is more like a pressure test for the market - excitement is excitement, but the truth will only be seen after it ends.
In terms of technical narrative, Fogo still focuses on the 'transaction priority' approach: block production at 40ms level, about 1.3s finality confirmation, plus their repeated emphasis on matching/order book style experience (at least the narrative is leaning towards professional trading infrastructure). I do not deny that this direction is appealing, especially to those who 'dislike slow chains.' But I will keep an eye on three more grounded things: first, whether the trading volume can hold up within 48 hours after the end of the event window; second, whether the depth (the thickness of buy and sell orders) is supported by a few accounts; third, whether the on-chain real trading/market-making behavior has shifted from 'task-driven' to 'habit-driven.' If these three conditions are not met, even the smoothest performance may only provide faster entry and exit points for short-term traders. DYOR, do not treat emotions as positions. @Fogo Official $FOGO
#Fogo

Indeed, the green color is comforting to the heart.

I saw the popularity of @Fogo Official today. To be honest, my first reaction was not "it has increased again," but rather "how much of this popularity is from task trading and how much is from market trading." Because the 2,000,000 FOGO token voucher event on CreatorPad (from 2026-02-13 01:00 UTC to 02-27 01:00 UTC) essentially drives attention and liquidity into one bucket. The short-term data will definitely look good, but it also easily leads people into the trap of "thinking it's fundamental when it's actually event-driven." My anchor is very simple: look at the market, not the hype—currently the price of $FOGO is around $0.028, with a 24h volume of about 40 to 60 million USD, and a market cap just over 100 million USD. For this size, even a little bit of sentiment and listing traffic can push it along; meanwhile, the circulating supply is about 3.78 billion, total supply 10 billion, and FDV is significantly higher than the current market cap. Once the unlocking expectations rise, sentiment will become very fragile. I also do not deny the technical narrative; Fogo is currently focusing on "trading first" SVM L1, repeatedly emphasizing a 40ms block time and about 1.3s finality in promotions. Such parameters are certainly enticing for high-frequency matching and on-chain order books, but what I care more about is whether these advantages can be maintained consistently in real congestion, real market making, and real trades, rather than just being stable in posters and posts. Therefore, my attitude towards $$FOGO is very cautious: I will ride the hype, but I will not consider "trading brought by events" as "the ecosystem is really running"; I focus on three things—whether the volume can hold after the event ends, whether the depth on-chain/exchanges becomes thicker instead of more slippery, and whether big orders are accumulating or distributing during each rise and pullback. #Fogo $FOGO

$ARTX The fourfold points have been down for so long, yet the price continues to drop. It's not that the project lacks logic; the project is indeed making progress, and a bunch of ARTokens are set to launch in the future, keeping a steady pace. However, with Binance's fourfold points event nearing its end and the weak market trend, I’m hesitant to invest heavily. I will reduce my position a bit and wait for confirmation before coming back. The market can still be monitored; once the principal is gone, it's truly gone.

In recent days, seeing the popularity of Fogo, I have instead hit the brakes — the popularity may be generated by activities, but the risks are always borne by oneself. Currently, @Fogo Official is directly catalyzed by CreatorPad: 2,000,000 FOGO tokens, with the activity period from 2026-02-13 01:00 (UTC) to 02-27 01:00 (UTC). At the same time, Binance Earn's Spring Earn Fiesta is also being promoted, offering a share equivalent to $1,000,000 in FOGO rewards, and noting 'up to 29.9% APR.' I admit it's lively, but I care more about: after the activity ends, how much real trading remains on-chain, or is it just the silence left after the task party disperses.
To provide an anchor, so we don't end up talking about nothing: as of 2026-02-24, Bybit's data shows that $FOGO is priced at approximately $0.0281, with a 24h volume of about $38.6M, a circulation of approximately 3.78B, and a market cap of about $105M. This scale is not small, indicating that it has entered the range of 'serious betting by some,' which also means that volatility will not be gentle; don't expect to win effortlessly with a single click.
I recognize and am cautious of Fogo's positioning: it treats 'trading experience' as the main dish, and the community often discusses metrics like ~40ms block time and ~1.3s finality. However, the more it is 'born for trading,' the easier it is to lean towards a minority, and ordinary people are most likely to suffer losses in slippage, congestion, and emotions. I focus on three lifelines: whether the trading volume can stabilize after the activity ends; whether market depth and slippage have improved; and whether there are applications in the ecosystem that can be used repeatedly, rather than just posters. If any two fail, I would rather miss out than become a liquidity philanthropist. #Fogo $FOGO

When the market rises, it feels like financial freedom,
When it falls, it reveals itself as wealth distribution.
Once the defense line is broken, it breaks again,
Now even those pretending to be dead are too lazy to sigh.
Alpha's four times points were previously a faith recharge,
But this thing is about to end in a few days, if you don't hurry up, you'll lose——by the time you're done recharging, even your house number will be changed.

#ARTX #Ultiland