Binance Square

techrisk

699 views
4 Discussing
Cole Seneca Tq8v
--
$BTC OPENAI ENTERS โ€œTOO BIG TO FAILโ€ MODE ๐Ÿšจ OpenAIโ€™s massive investment (~$1.4B for 30 GW by end of 2025) ends the bubble/non-bubble debate โ€” AI is now systemically critical. WHAT CHANGES: โ€“ Narrative shifts โ†’ financial viability becomes central โ€“ AI players become highly interdependent โ€“ OpenAI emerges as an acknowledged systemic risk THE HEART OF THE PROBLEM: โ€“ Projected revenues: ~$155B ARR by 2030 โ€“ Structurally deficit model โ†’ negative cash flow, accumulated deficit ~$971B (2025โ€“2030) โ€“ Every $1 earned โ†’ $3 spent โ€“ Permanent reliance on external financing CHANNELS OF CONTAGION: โ€“ Rising cost of capital โ†’ AI valuation compression โ€“ Potential domino effect on NVIDIA & Microsoft โ€“ Regulatory pressure linked to public aid โ€“ Physical constraints: energy & water โ€“ Monetization still non-scalable THE AI DILEMMA: โ€“ Success โ†’ macroeconomic tensions โ€“ Failure โ†’ massive devaluations โ€“ Either way โ†’ systemic risk THE ROTATION: โ€“ Unprofitable pure-play AIs penalized โ€“ Profitable, essential infrastructure favored (energy, memory, utilities) โ€“ AI exposure occurs via profitable bricks CONCLUSION: โ€“ OpenAI is now a central point of fragility โ€“ High contagion risk if shock occurs โ€“ Likely public intervention โ€“ Stability preserved, returns under pressure #AI #OpenAI #TechRisk #SystemicRisk
$BTC OPENAI ENTERS โ€œTOO BIG TO FAILโ€ MODE ๐Ÿšจ
OpenAIโ€™s massive investment (~$1.4B for 30 GW by end of 2025) ends the bubble/non-bubble debate โ€” AI is now systemically critical.
WHAT CHANGES:
โ€“ Narrative shifts โ†’ financial viability becomes central
โ€“ AI players become highly interdependent
โ€“ OpenAI emerges as an acknowledged systemic risk
THE HEART OF THE PROBLEM:
โ€“ Projected revenues: ~$155B ARR by 2030
โ€“ Structurally deficit model โ†’ negative cash flow, accumulated deficit ~$971B (2025โ€“2030)
โ€“ Every $1 earned โ†’ $3 spent
โ€“ Permanent reliance on external financing
CHANNELS OF CONTAGION:
โ€“ Rising cost of capital โ†’ AI valuation compression
โ€“ Potential domino effect on NVIDIA & Microsoft
โ€“ Regulatory pressure linked to public aid
โ€“ Physical constraints: energy & water
โ€“ Monetization still non-scalable
THE AI DILEMMA:
โ€“ Success โ†’ macroeconomic tensions
โ€“ Failure โ†’ massive devaluations
โ€“ Either way โ†’ systemic risk
THE ROTATION:
โ€“ Unprofitable pure-play AIs penalized
โ€“ Profitable, essential infrastructure favored (energy, memory, utilities)
โ€“ AI exposure occurs via profitable bricks
CONCLUSION:
โ€“ OpenAI is now a central point of fragility
โ€“ High contagion risk if shock occurs
โ€“ Likely public intervention
โ€“ Stability preserved, returns under pressure
#AI #OpenAI #TechRisk #SystemicRisk
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
โšก๏ธ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interact with your favorite creators
๐Ÿ‘ Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number